The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOWasteful tax spending in Japan 2nd lowest in 10 years: auditor
TOKYO©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
13 Comments
Login to comment
Kobe White Bar Owner
HAHAHA god thanks for the laugh!
Yubaru
I'm will Kobe here.....ALWAYS love waking up to a good joke on a Saturday AM that I have to work!
JeffLee
The Olympics has already started haunting this govt, like I predicted it would.
Cricky
The cases include 292 violations of laws and regulations covering 7.5 billion yen in spending. And those responsible for "292 violations" did they get named, were they punished? Perhaps a vigorous spanking with a wet tissue? I find these findings to be a waist of tax payer money itself as it's hardly believeable.
talaraedokko
Details please.
Mohit Budhiraja
Haha ! I volunteer to audit the spendings and very confident that wasteful spending will be atleast 10 times
Do the hustle
This goes well with the report the other day about the protest for using public money to pay for the new emperor’s indoctrination ceremony.
kurisupisu
Only billions of yen being wasted, don’t worry!
The people will keep on paying....
Goodlucktoyou
Paying for Tepco wasn’t listed, redesigning a stadium to be used once wasn’t listed, funding whaling wasn’t listed, selling land to Abe’s friends wasn’t listed...boring, back to bed.
Goodlucktoyou
@Kuri. Yes we will. 2% more in tax and tax breaks for top companies.
englisc aspyrgend
Depends on your definition of waste!
socrateos
Spending, whether you like (not-wasting) or not (wasting), is good for economy because it becomes someone's income - a source of further spending.
Kobe White Bar Owner
@socreateos
"Spending, whether you like (not-wasting) or not (wasting), is good for economy because it becomes someone's income - a source of further spending."
Please study just a little economics before making such statements please.