Toshiba shareholders vote for independent probe into investor pressure

The Japan Courts under the Constitution of Japan allow and promote the fair judgement of conciliation of assets, and administrative review. The Administrative Appeal Law, no. 160 of 1962 as amended, allows motion for action by petition investigative demand, Art. 3 of an Administrative Agency, or disposed agency, or as forbearance agency. The disposition to affirm or form legal relation of parties is allowed by sustaining or objection motions in these matters. A question of the Summary Court and private property that the Civil Provisional Remedies Act 1989 can prohibit direct contact verse the issue of subject matter of property assets at the venue of the District Court for discovery of the Financial Services Agency Commissioner legal authority under the Constitution of Japan is a serious issue that shareholders of Toshiba ethically can consider. The Japanese Government and officers of banks when these discovery motions are in case management with any acknowledged use of the rule of law and comity can request a leave of the court to prove they have no involved nature of the subject matter by business agreements prima facie and merit of the court. See, Amended Administrative Procedures Act no. 88 of 1993, Article 19 Intervenor by Cabinet Order. What does that mean for inheritance law of Japan, and a foreign state jurisdiction and indexed asset management of capital, when Japanese employees communicate financial data motivating the operations management of general business? ( Cf, Employees Pension Insurance Act no. 115 of 1954, as amended.)