The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOJapan looks to cash in on matcha boom to boost green tea exports
TOKYO©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
10 Comments
Login to comment
sakurasuki
Just like tourism in Japan in recent years, it have huge economy effect but not big enough to elevate Japanese economy.
factchecker
They're not worried about tourists gobbling up green tea but they are about the rice. Nope, I can't figure that one out either.
kurisupisu
So, tea plants are thriving but cabbage is not?
GBR48
Alongside 'kimono-style' wrap dresses, Matcha may now be the most pervasive example of Japanese culture in the UK. It is widely available. I drink it every day, have been doing do since I first visited Japan, and encourage others to try it. It ticks a lot of 'superfood' boxes.
iknowall
So no blaming on "climate change" for the tea
virusrex
Climate change is lowering the quality of the tea, not that much the quantity.
https://yunomi.life/blogs/japanese-tea-guide/climate-change-and-tea-chemistry
At least in Japan the most important reason for the drop of production is population decline.
iknowall
Nowhere is that conspiracy mentioned in the article. For obvious reasons. The word of one blogger kind of fizzles out.
The article does mention "the booming market abroad for matcha"---looks like quality conspiracies aren't holding back discerning consumers.
That's what the article concludes!
Jimizo
What makes you sure they are discerning customers?
Nowhere in the article does it mention consumers are going for quality. It does mention health:
You misunderstood the meaning of basic Japanese food and drink culture. You didn’t even know what ‘sashimi’ meant.
50/1 on this being your area of knowledge.
virusrex
First, it is not a conspiracy, it is a well described phenomenon, when something is proved there is no need to use the excuse of a conspiracy to explain why there is no evidence of it, the evidence is plenty.
Second, it is mentioned without problem in the reference provided. What is the point of pretending not being able to read it? Even if you don't want to recognize the effects of climate change there is no point in responding as if the reference was not included there
Again, no conspiracy, and again the reference explain what kind of measures are being used to fight against the loss of quality, what of the measures described can you prove is false?
Sven Asai
Tencha, sencha, matcha? No chance, they finally drink only kocha there. lol