business

Used car exports drives pollution to developing world

10 Comments
By Taimaz SZIRNIKS

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2020 AFP

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

10 Comments
Login to comment

Out of sight, out of mind for our waste.

Shame on us for consuming so much.

1 ( +5 / -4 )

The Japanese regularly change cars after 3-4 years-what a waste!

To manufacture a new car causes far more pollution than a second hand car will ever emit.

Used vehicles should only be exported if roadworthy in the country of origin and if not, should be crushed and melted back down.

I have a 17 year old used car which still works fine and will only change it for another used car next year.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Even in the 70s and 80s I can recall asking why we saw so few "vintage" cars, and being told they were sold to Africa and SE Asia. Sadly, nothing new here. The news would be if/when we stop using gasoline! Ecars are the future!

0 ( +1 / -1 )

To manufacture a new car causes far more pollution than a second hand car will ever emit.

That's not true if the new car gets better fuel economy, or in Europe is a gasoline car replacing a pretend-clean diesel, because PM and NOx kill people. The problem is that most car buyers don't give a monkeys about pollution, so many new cars are no real improvement on what has come before.

I drive a s/h Alphard Hybrid that is 17 years old. I could walk into a dealer today and buy a new minivan with higher emissions. However, it will have angular bodywork and look cool, because that's what sells cars.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

@kohakuebisu

Are you really telling us that producing a car emits less pollution than driving it for its useful life?

I don’t think so...

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Yeah. Poorer countries shouldn't be allowed to have nice things.

Talk about human rights. UN is a monster

0 ( +2 / -2 )

According to this, 77% of the life cycle emissions of a gasoline car are from driving it. Production amounts for 23%. That's three times as many emissions from driving than manufacturing. I doubt more than 20% of the purchase price of a new car is for the energy used in making it.

For hybrids, the split is 61% vs. 39%, meaning that manufacturing is more important but only because driving uses less fuel than a regular car. Total emissions, the most important number, are also likely to be lower.

https://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/workingdocuments/MC-P-11-15a%20Lifecycle%20emissions%20report.pdf

This 77% number will be an average of course, and some cars will be way more eco to drive than others. For a Hummer, I guess 95% of its emissions will be from driving. A 1970s Civic will be much lower, like a hybrid car.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Yeah. Poorer countries shouldn't be allowed to have nice things.

Like asthma, cardiovascular illnesses and cancer?

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

A lot of cool older cars, a few of which I'd love to own, are being crushed in the name of reduced air pollution. Sigh. Among the three cars I own the oldest one, a 1988 Audi, is by far my favorite to drive. The newer cars leave me cold. And that old Audi tests great every two years when I smog it.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

i cant agree with author of this article.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites