Police in Tsu, Mie Prefecture, have arrested an 18-year-old male high school student on suspicion of “sextortion,” after he threatened a 16-year-old girl that he would post photos of her naked online unless she had sex with him.
According to the police, the student and the girl met through a mutual friend some time ago, NTV reported. The suspect contacted the girl on Saturday and threatened to post the photos online in an attempt to coerce her into having sex with him, police said.
Instead, the girl consulted with police.
Police said the boy has admitted to the allegation and quoted him as saying “I just wanted to have sex with her.”
Police did not give any details on how or when the suspect obtained photos of the girl.
© Japan Today
31 Comments
Login to comment
リッチ
This doesn’t need the drama of national news and being arrested and charged but some parental interventions and possibly some psychiatric assistance. The girl clearly was involved with arousing him and appears to be just childish attempt to manipulate her just like she probably was manipulating him. An innocent girl wouldn’t be sharing photos that couldn’t be posted without some dubious intentions herself.
Marc Lowe
Sometimes, teenagers hormones get the better of them. Surely, we've all had uncontrollable urges. But, if he admitted it, wouldn't this make it no longer "suspicion of?". Thank goodness the girl was able to get help from the police. So many times I read of their failure and the horrible results of their lack of vigilance.
MarkX
リッチ, how do you know she was involved with trying to arouse him? Maybe they were AI generated. It is very easy to do these days. Or maybe they he was stalking her and took some compromising pictures of her. He is a dangerous predator and should be dealt with severely!
Yubaru
I do not care one bit that he is still in HS. He is 18 and an adult, he should be named! Time to show these new "adults" that they have to be responsible for their actions.
Sometime ago? He is 18, she 16, just how long is "some time".........
Hmmm.... maybe the "friend" can answer this question? There is more to this than what is being reported here. Be really nice to have a "real" reporter give a full story, instead of these "articles" meant for click bait!
Toshihiro
Yeah, that kid is going to places. Better to nip him in the bud today than to let him be and progress to more hardcore stuff.
WoodyLee
DESPERADO, why don't come to your senses? You've been out riding fences for so long now,
Get a girlfriend, much better than going to Jail.
virusrex
For a country where sexual violence is routinely normalize there is huge value in presenting the case publicly and making sure people understand forcing others to have sex have serious consequences and that people could realistically lose their whole futures for doing it. At this point the priority should be the public, not the criminal.
Unfortunately one of the many fixed things in this site is that for every sexual crimes there will be users that will make every attempt to blame the victim. Extremely immoral and a huge example of what should not be done ever.
IMadeAnAccountJustForThis
If she's sending him naked pictures, it sounds logical that they are perhaps in a relationship already; she is the girlfriend.
I feel sorry for her in that her trust was betrayed in such a way. At least she went to the police so good on her for that!
virusrex
Or got them from a third party, extortion, deceived her, etc. Unfortunately there are many ways for a victim to reach this situation.
Alongfortheride
The police will not name him while still being at school because that will also identify who the girl is to be ridiculed and bullied at school.
YeahRight
Oh, everyone at the school is fully aware of who this guy is. My guess is that he has come down with long-term COVID and is staying away from school.
NotThe One
Another possibility is she had sex with his friend or flirted with that friend. She sent those pictures to the other person or allowed the other person to take the photos. That third person shared them with him. He wanted to have sex with her after seeing the photos and attempted to blackmail her.
I wonder if the friend in common will be charged.
リッチ
MarkX Had they been the article would have said it. She clearly sent them otherwise there would be additional charges. She bears some responsibility and they are children. Not national news. Parents should deal with it not the media or police. Total waste of time.
shogun36
gee, thanks "mutual friend"
iron man
Why complicate it, young guy got photos???, committed blackmail, pleads guilty, done. how many old guys and gals got knocked by electric cars during that period of time? apology, deliberate change of tack based on the full postings of today
girl_in_tokyo
リッチToday 07:12 am JST
It doesn't matter if she sent him pictures of herself or not - he's the one who committed a crime, and planned out a way he could rape her. Yes, rape her - coercion is forced sex, and forced sex is rape.
You are reaching for a way to downplay rape and to blame the victim.
Alongfortheride
Once again someone making a judgment call when they have no idea.
リッチ
Girl_in_tokyo they are children and frankly any girl or woman sending nudes to a man or boy should expect them to be share on the internet. I’m sick of these I’m the victim. She took part. This isn’t the west thank goodness. The west has gotten totally insane on ruining children’s lives over nonsense. Maybe we can arrest her for sending child porn thru the internet. That’s what she did sending her nudes out. If this was the west persons that would be a crime also. She isn’t innocent.
virusrex
The charges against the rapist are clear and enough to justify the arrest, further charges can be added later without rushing.
Which say much more negative things about you and your scale of values than about the victims. Doubling down on a terribly wrong conduct like blaming the victim is even worse. By this point this is too obviously something only people with low moral try to do.
Extorting someone to rape her is not "nonsense" but a clear crime that should be punished, there is no defense on the crime, and automatically going to defend the criminal instead of the victim (whose life can be destroyed by this) clearly demonstrate some very negative things about you.
girl_in_tokyo
ッチToday 01:52 pm JST
Yes. Which is why we can forgive her for perhaps being too naive and not having good judgment in who she can trust.
And why we should be alarmed at a young man planning out ways to rape women.
What do you mean? That women who share nude photos with a man who turns out to be a not to be trusted and a horrible person deserve to be punished by having their photos put online?
Or do you mean that women should be very careful about sharing nude photos with men because there are men in the world who are horrible people?
Ah. You mean she deserves to be punished for her poor judgment and naïveté by having her phots shared and being threatened with rape. Got it.
She is a child, as you pointed out. But you would punish her severely for having poor judgment and naïveté, yet give the boy a slap on the wrist for planning a rape.
How do you logically justify that, other than by admitting that you think women should not be sexual and should never express their sexuality.
Hm. But where does that leave men? It seems to me that oppressing women and punishing them for being sexual human beings is shooting your self in the foot.
On one hand, men continually complain that their girlfriends or wives aren’t giving them enough sex, and the on the other they want to oppress female sexuality and frighten them into repressing themselves, and teach them to be afraid of sex and be afraid of men..
You can’t have both.
1glenn
There isn't enough information in the article to make a rush to judgment.
Blackstar
リッチ
they are children and frankly any girl or woman sending nudes to a man or boy should expect them to be share on the internet. I’m sick of these I’m the victim. She took part.*There is no indication whatsoever in the article that the girl sent the boy naked photos. You decided that's what happened, so now you write about it like it's a fact. Shame on you!
Although no one here knows the facts, if you wanted to make guesses the fact that they "met through a mutual friend" would more likely suggest that the so-called "friend" shared the naked photos with the accused.
Gene Hennigh
It's so easy to crop photos these days, especially with AI that it's quite possible that he did that. If he is charged and she isn't would seem to indicate that he was seen as the criminal and that she was innocent. She didn't necessarily send him photos and possibly she never posed nude. It seems that it's possible for this to have happened. Without knowing more, I'd go with cropping. Maybe not, but she is still the victim of a crime.
Newgirlintown
リッチ Nice victim blaming there. You are just plain wrong.
Chabbawanga
It needs to be stamped out at a young age.
Here is a lovely story I saw today of how a group of ES 6th grade boys molested a 1st grade girl and received no punishment. The victim would routinely bump into her molesters at and around school causing severe trauma-PTSD with no intervention at all by teachers.
https://news.goo.ne.jp/article/kanagawa/region/kanagawa-20240916211000.html
Yubaru
IF she send nude pictures of herself to the guy, she is ALSO guilty of the child porn law. Sure he is guilty, but SHE is not without blame according to the law.
girl_in_tokyo
YubaruSep. 17 06:35 pm JST
Taking selfies of yourself isn't child porn. Child porn is when an adult exploits a child. Since it is impossible to exploit yourself it's not child porn. This argument is ridiculous. JMFC.
Strangerland
She's a victim of herself? Is that your theory?
Yubaru
Read what I wrote. SENDING the pictures is a direct violation of the child porn law.
Yubaru
My comment was in response to the question not answered by the article regarding how the nude pictures were shared with the guy in question.
It certainly seems to me that she could have sent them along herself, and all I was stating was that IF that is the case she certainly could be seen as being guilty of violating the child porn laws here about sending pictures or videos of minors via the internet.
I have no idea of what she is, all I proposed is one plausible explanation of how the pictures got into the possession of the guy in question.
Or the other guy involved sent them along, which could make him guilty of the child porn laws, but one could reasonably think that if that was the case the cops would have noted that, but like I quoted here from the article they didnt give any details, which suggests the girl herself may have forwarded them to either one of, or both of the guys mentioned in the article.