The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
Far-left activist charged with police slaying after 45 years on run
TOKYO©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
14 Comments
Login to comment
Thunderbird2
Glad they got him... and also glad that they dropped that stupid Statute of Limitations rule... it's just a daft idea.
Toasted Heretic
People like him give activists a bad name and harm the cause, more often than not.
Wolfpack
These are the kinds of people that become heroes to America's arch Liberals. Glad that in Japan these radical thugs have not been normalized.
Wolfpack
The
shallots
@Wolfpack
Arch liberal? i never heard that term before. Like who? Maybe you mean like far left anarchists? But he proves they're hardly just in America.
SwissToni
Is a radical liberal not a contradiction? You can have radical right wing and left wing activists, you can have radical religious zealots but radical liberalism? I think not.
sassarma
It is the law of Universe to punish the culprit even after forty years. It never fails. Justice may be delayed or denied, but the law of action would catch you unaware.
Nippori Nick
It fails many times and there is no such "law". Many culprits go unpunished.
Educator60
"As the trial of Osaka's alleged accomplice was suspended in 1981 due to mental illness, the statute of limitations for the murder case has not expired. The 15-year statute of limitations for murder was abolished in 2010."
The abolishment of the statue of limitations for murder is irrelevant to this case which occurred long before that. As mentioned, the clock on Osaka's case was halted when the suspected accomplice's trial was suspended (but not dismissed). That clock was restarted when the suspected accomplice died but the 15 years haven't run out yet so it's possible to arrest him.
Illogical
Statute of limitations... I can appreciate such a thing for very minor offences but any criminal offence should have no such thing. For example some of these corporate and governmental fraud cases pocketed millions to the offenders and though now the evidence indicates that these people are as guilty as sin and have lived a life of luxury, they cannot be prosecuted because of this act. Similar again to rapists and child molesters.
Sam Watters
It was explained to me that the reason for a statute of limitations was that the paperwork became obtrusive. Now that things can be stored digitally there is no further need for time limitations.
Striker10
I have the feeling that the only reason the police were still so actively pursuing this case is because it was a police officer who was murdered... would they be as dogged if it was just a regular person who was killed? I hope my feeling is wrong though.
Educator60
Now I'm not sure if my earlier post was correct. Different news programs have been giving different explanations as to why police were able to arrest Osaka even though it's been more than 15 years since the murder. In addition to the version I mentioned earlier, another was that Osaka's clock was stopped when the accomplice's trial went into suspension and then when the law on limitations was passed it was applied to his case retroactively. In that version the clock wasn't restarted when the accomplice died. It seems the people reporting the news are confused :-(
Illogical
Thanks Sam that's most probably the reason. Surely though as you suggest digital documents should mean the end of these statutes.