The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOProsecutors appeal ruling on man who kept teenage girl captive for 2 years
SAITAMA©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
13 Comments
Login to comment
Disillusioned
I think the 15 years sought is still too light.
Oh, so that makes it ok to kidnap and confine a young teenage girl for two years? This joker planned the kidnapping long before he took her. He had done modifications to his house, including soundproofing a room in preparation to confine a young girl. This demented pervert should never be let out of jail!
serendipitous1
9 years is too short. He should get at least 10 times the length of time he kept her confined, so a 20-year sentence would be more fitting.
Tommy Jones
Nothing like prosecutors being able to take a second bite at the apple.
zones2surf
Seriously, it is absolutely clear that the individuals that are 'judges' in Japanese courts have no business being judges.... one wonders if they might actually fantasize about doing the very crime that Terauchi committed.
Goodlucktoyou
I think 10 years is fine after chopping off his goolies
Ah_so
If you get your kicks from kidnapping teenage girls, you are almost certainly sexually motivated.
TigersTokyoDome
Straight question that hopefully was answered in court - did he have sexual relations with her. I dont think he did otherwise we would have read about a rape charge as well. In no way does this exonerate this awful crime, but the court needs to recognise that he was a wacko and not a sexual predator. 15 years is too severe and the 9 years handed seems strict enough. 9 years in a Japanese jail for a university student my friends - it doesnt help the poor girl to recover, but its not going to be a nice experience for 9 years for him.
Stewie
"The court pointed out "the physical confinement was moderate" as Terauchi left a window unlocked and often went on a trip, leaving the girl at home. It also acknowledged the confinement involved "no physical violence or verbal abuse."
So did he just want the company? Weird.
therougou
They are pretty consistent in that they give a lighter sentence if it's a mom killing her own kid. Ridiculous, but consistent.
If I recall correctly the girl in this case felt her parents were too controlling and this might be the reason why she didn't try to escape earlier, despite being given every chance to do so.
Yubaru
Hey, both sides have the same chance here. THe prosecutors made their recommendation, the court rejected it and came up with their own. It's not a "second bite" at anything HERE, the first one is not completed yet!
If they were going for a retrial, which they aren't, that would be a different story.
starpunk
He ruined the most formative years of her life and she has PTSD scars from this. The judges are being too lenient here. The damage done to the girl's psyche is probably permanent. I guess that wasn't taken into consideration when dishing out the sentence? "the physical confinement was moderate" - what is moderate? Was she drugged? Chained? Gagged? That's still physical abuse, folks! And if she was raped then that certainly is abuse. 9 years or even 15 isn't enough time for this sicko pervert.
starpunk
There's a similar case in the USA. Ever hear of Kimberly Smart?