Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
Image: YouTube/Netflix
entertainment

'Emily in Paris' season three – Netflix hit loses sight of the real city

9 Comments
By Hannah J Thompson

Everyone in Paris knows it: Emily Cooper (Lily Collins) is at the top of her game.

Since her arrival in the French capital in season one of this immediate Netflix hit, Emily has used her American influencer flair to successfully promote all manner of luxury products to the French market via her viral social media campaigns. And with all the usual drama along the way, she goes from strength to strength in season three.

The show’s love affair with big-name brands makes it a product placement dream. But it is, of course, the city of Paris that is its most successful product by far.

The show is not set in the real Paris, the French metropolis of more than 2 million inhabitants, but a parallel “Paris™” – a perfect version. This is Paris the brand, one that has been carefully curated by generations of writers, artists and filmmakers over hundreds of years.

Paris in the global imagination

Paris is everybody’s favorite fantasy city.

There’s Emma Bovary’s imaginary wanderings around the city in Gustave Flaubert’s 1857 masterpiece, and Amélie Poulain’s playful treasure hunt in the eponymous 2001 blockbuster. The Impressionists painted dreamy scenes of outdoor cafes and sunsets on the Seine. And who could forget Juliette Binoche’s firework-illuminated antics in Leos Carax’s 1991 classic "Les Amants du Pont-Neuf " (The Lovers on the Bridge)?

As well as the City of Light, Paris has always been a city of dreams, romance and beauty in the global imagination.

Like its on-screen predecessors, Emily’s Paris is instantly recognizable as “Paris™”. But it is simultaneously unrecognizable, bearing very little resemblance to the real Paris you encounter when you step off the Eurostar at the Gare du Nord. Indeed, even the fleeting representation of this train station in "Emily in Paris" is unrealistic.

When Emily goes to surprise her English love interest, Alfie, on his return from London in the middle of season three, she waits for him outside the station’s main entrance. But anyone who has arrived in Paris by Eurostar knows that travellers from London either vanish underground to the station’s many Métro lines, or turn right to head for the taxi rank at the side-exit. Either Alfie is walking or he is taking the bus – which, given these characters’ addiction to taxis, seems highly unlikely.

In fact, Paris has an efficient, affordable and comprehensive public transport system. The city is served by 14 metro lines, 58 bus routes and three trams. Most Parisians (65%) travel to work by public transport And the numbers who travel to work on foot like Emily and her boss Sylvie (Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu) are much smaller (10%).

Despite the enduring cliche, only about 5% of Parisians cycle to work like Emily’s colleague Luc (Bruno Gouery). Yet except for a couple of fleeting shots of the picturesque above-ground sections of Métro lines 6 and 2, Emily’s Paris is devoid of public transport. It is equally empty of cars.

Despite recent improvements in pedestrian access, especially along the Seine, Paris is still absolutely full of traffic. Taxis, cars, bikes, mopeds, electric scooters, emergency vehicles, dustbin lorries and roller bladers all battle for space on its always congested roads. And yet Emily and her friends spend hours sitting in outdoor café terraces without ever being affected by noise or air pollution.

Where are all the Parisians?

Emily’s Paris is also eerily empty of people. And those who do walk its streets are almost all young and attractive. This gives us dangerously unrealistic expectations of the city. “Paris Syndrome”, the shock experienced by tourists when Paris does not live up to expectations, is responsible for around 50 episodes of serious mental illness per year.

Real Paris is a bustling metropolis whose pavements are always crowded with people of all ages, races and economic status. Like other European capitals, Paris has seen a huge increase in homelessness over the last several decades. Whole areas of the city near the ring road and under bridges have been transformed into makeshift refugee camps.

These harsh social and economic realities are airbrushed out of Emily’s Paris along with rubbish bins, police sirens and the building sites that always seem to proliferate in this city.

During filming for season three, the iconic Notre-Dame cathedral was shrouded in scaffolding following the devastating 2019 fire – yet the cathedral appears completely unscathed in several shots of the river.

Some comfort can be taken in the fact that the show’s characters are refreshingly aware they are living in a fictional Paris. They frequently acknowledge that life in Paris is a dream and compare their lives to a film with a Hollywood (rather than “French”) ending.

Season three even begins with a dream sequence which is repeated in real life later in the same episode. This blurring of dream and reality reminds us that Emily in Paris is a guilty pleasure, a marvel of escapism which is about as good at impersonating Paris as Emily is at speaking French.

Hannah J Thompson is professor of French and Critical Disability Studies, Royal Holloway University of London.

The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

© The Conversation

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

9 Comments
Login to comment

OK......

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

The entire premise of the show is about a young "talented" American woman who moves to Paris and teaches all those stupid French people how to do things.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

My spouse loves the show but I don't think it needs to be taken seriously. The fashions are interesting and there is some good singing. It is what it is.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

It's about as accurate a portrayal of Paris as the creators' previous hit series, Sex and the City, was an accurate portrayal of NYC.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

It's not a documentary, it's escapist entertainment. Let's lighten up.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Oof, the author seems to have missed the whole appeal of the show. You can pick out silly details like that for any movie, but nobody cares, it’s a lighthearted superficial show and that’s why it’s great.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Having gotten off at the Gare du Nord, one evening and experienced the ‘real Paris’ I would say that it is more akin to a scene out of a Jean Luc Besson film!

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

I don't know anyone who thinks that a show depicting an American in France being a fashion or otherwise influencer that is not a Hollywood star beforehand is interesting remotely plausible need to rethink their life!

America where Wonder bread is the main thing.

Pass

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

garypenJan. 2  11:16 am JST

It's about as accurate a portrayal of Paris as the creators' previous hit series, Sex and the City, was an accurate portrayal of NYC.

Tell me about it. Trailers and opening credits are just window dressing. I visited Boston for the very first time and on Beacon Street there is the famous 'Cheers' bar, complete with a yellow banner outside. It's a basement pub, the sign is there above the stepway. But the interior of the joint is radically different than what you see on TV.

And may I note that the lovely Lily Collins is the daughter of the British rocker PHIL?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites