Netflix is being sued for alleged breach of copyright over a new Sherlock Holmes film Photo: AFP/File
entertainment

Conan Doyle estate sues Netflix over 'emotional' Sherlock Holmes

6 Comments
By BEN STANSALL

Netflix is being sued by the estate of Sherlock Holmes creator Arthur Conan Doyle for alleged breach of copyright after a new film portrayed the famous detective as having feelings and respecting women.

The movie, "Enola Holmes" -- starring "Stranger Things" actor Millie Bobby Brown -- is a Netflix adaptation of a series of Nancy Springer novels that imagines the detective has a teenage sister.

Although a separate court case established early Holmes novels are in the public domain, the lawsuit alleges the detective only developed feelings in the last 10 books, which remain under the control of Arthur Conan Doyle estate.

"Holmes became warmer. He became capable of friendship. He could express emotion. He began to respect women," the suit, filed in New Mexico federal court, claimed.

The suit alleges Holmes only shows his feelings in the final novels, arguing that as a result Springer's depiction and Netflix's adaptation would violate their copyright.

The lawsuit notes that when he wrote the later novels, Doyle had lost both his brother and his eldest son in the First World War: "It was no longer enough that the Holmes character was the most brilliant rational and analytical mind. Holmes needed to be human."

The suit says that as well as using publicly available characters, Springer's "novels copy Conan Doyle's original additions in the Copyrighted Stories.

"Among other copied elements, the Springer novels make extensive infringing use of Conan Doyle's transformation of Holmes from cold and critical to warm, respectful, and kind in his relationships."

In addition to Netflix, the lawsuit also targets Springer, her publisher Penguin Random House and the producer of the latest film Legendary Pictures.

© 2020 AFP

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

6 Comments
Login to comment

Sherlock's alexithymia is "elementary", after all!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Should be happy the character is still white and straight and male. Even that isn’t guaranteed anymore.

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

Lucy Liu played a good Dr. Watson.

I don’t see any reason why a black lesbian couldn’t do an equally good job.

Good actors act well.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Are they suing for the defamation of a fictional character?

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Should be happy the character is still white and straight and male. Even that isn’t guaranteed anymore.

Too late. Holmes has already been female, Asian, black and implied to be gay. The word didn't end, and entirely faithful adaptations of Doyle's works are freely available (as well as the original stories), if you need reassurance.

Having said that, this seems like a frivolous lawsuit. I'm not sure why the Doyle estate (for information purposes, the author's surname was NOT 'Conan Doyle') is claiming copyright over a character transition, and moreover one that's pretty vague in the original tales. Especially when they haven't done the same over the substantial changes featured in other adaptations.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Doyle died in 1930. I think it is nonsensical for his descendants to be making money off his works 90 years later. Copyrights have only been extended this far to suit corporate interests, most famously Disney's.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites