Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
entertainment

Gal Gadot 'whitewashing' row sparks Cleopatra history debate

35 Comments
By ANGELA WEISS

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2020 AFP

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

35 Comments
Login to comment

They should have a Japanese play the part.

11 ( +11 / -0 )

It's called ACTING people. This is not the same as black-face minstrel shows from yester-year.

It's her gig and she can do what she wants! The real question is about the outcome. I want to see terrific acting, make up, costumes etc. The angle of "through women's eyes" could be very interesting.

If Russell Crowe can play the role of a Roman Gladiator convincingly, why not an this actor playing the African Queen?

16 ( +18 / -2 )

The Israeli Gal is swarthy enough for the role. Much ado about nothing, methinks.

10 ( +13 / -3 )

Cleopatra wasn't black. Depictions of her done at the time -- busts and coins -- prove that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra#/media/File:Kleopatra-VII.-Altes-Museum-Berlin1.jpg

As for Gadot, her ancestors came from a land about 300 km away from Egypt, so yeah, she seems like the right pick.

These critics are ridiculous. But that's not surprising, in light of the current "social-justice" movement

22 ( +24 / -2 )

Holywood Romans

As historian Adrian Goldsworthy noted:

“Absolutely nothing is certain.  Cleopatra may have had black, brown, blonde or even red hair, and her eyes could have been brown, grey, green or blue.  Almost any combination of these is possible.  Similarly, she may have been very light skinned or had a darker more Mediterranean complexion.  Fairer skin is probably marginally more likely given her ancestry.  Greek art traditionally represented women and goddesses as very pale, and fair skin seems to have been part of the ideal of beauty.  Roman propaganda never suggested that Cleopatra was dark-skinned, although this may simply mean that she was not exceptionally dark or simply that the color of her skin was not important to her critics.

At no point will we need to consider Antony’s appearance at similar length and this should remind us that the obsession with Cleopatra’s looks is unusual, and not entirely healthy.  Not only is there no good evidence, but also there is something disturbing about the desire to base our understanding of her first and foremost on her appearance.Cleopatra was not another Helen of Troy, a mythical figure about whom the most important thing was her beauty.  She was no mere object of desire, but a very active political player in her own kingdom and beyond.

Cleopatra was born and raised in the real and very dangerous world of the Ptolemaic court in the first century BC.  When her father died in 51 BC, she became queen.  Auletes had planned for his son and daughter to rule jointly.  Cleopatra had other ideas.”

-from Antony And Cleopatra by Adrian Goldsworthy, c2010 pp.128-129

12 ( +12 / -0 )

Hollywood Romans

Writing in the New Your Review of Books (1/13/11) Professor Mary Beard observed:

“For the most part, however, we have no knowledge of many of the most   basic facts of Cleopatra’s life. Her famous end is perhaps well enough served, with some further eyewitness testimony (however biased or            unreliable it may be, and all from her enemy’s side). Of the beginning of her life we know almost nothing. She was the daughter of Ptolemy XII, but the identity of her mother is a mystery, as is the date of her birth.”

“The truth is that “peel[ing] away the encrusted myth” of Cleopatra reveals that there is very little underneath the ancient fictional surface, and certainly nothing that can be the stuff of a plausible life story—unless it is            padded out with half-relevant background that is, in a sense, fiction of a different kind. In this case the rich evidence on papyrus that survives from Greco-Roman Egypt hardly helps. In the end, we should probably resist the  allure of biography and stick with the Augustan myth and Horace’s  ‘demented queen.’”

5 ( +5 / -0 )

Just let everyone play everyone else. Why not? Makes things more interesting.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

What? They can't find pictures of Cleopatra on Google?

8 ( +9 / -1 )

Stupid woke SJWs are so so annoying, time I wish I could go back in time to when these fools didnt exist!!

Whoever is responsible for the creation of SJWs sure has a lot to answer for LOL!!!

And yeah she was GREEK,............

10 ( +13 / -3 )

What? They can't find pictures of Cleopatra on Google?

Woke doesn't play well with facts.

6 ( +9 / -3 )

Woke just jumped the shark with this latest case of retarded, faux "outrage"

1 ( +4 / -3 )

BigYenToday  07:52 am JST

These objections are either pretty ignorant, or just politically motivated, or both. There's some controversy about Cleo's ethnicity, but the majority opinion is...

Scholars identify Cleopatra as having been essentially of Greek ancestry with some Persian and Syrian ancestry, based on the fact that her Macedonian Greek family (the Ptolemaic dynasty) had intermingled with the Seleucid aristocracy of the time... Cleopatra probably had not a drop of Egyptian blood and that she "would have described herself as Greek."

It's very clear from the original artwork and mummy masks that the first Egyptians were black. Unquestionably. However due to the Nile and their approximation to the Medditerrean Sea, everybody wanted something from there and Egypt was invaded by various peoples over time and there were some mixing , incl. interracial marriage and sex. Art works from later centuries show this. Even the busts of Cleopatra herself show some skin darkening but not necessarily black traits. Maybe some.

Cleopatra in no way looked like Elizabeth Taylor. By her time the Egyptian language was extinct and the Greek language and culture was predominate. After all the centuries and millenia did Cleopatra have some Black African ancestry? Probably. How much? It's hard to tell due to all that time before, and all the time since. And when the Romans took over that stuff didn't matter. in the Roman Empire race really didn't mean squat. Black subjects could be citizens, Romans traded with African kingdoms and more.

-8 ( +4 / -12 )

Cleopatra in no way looked like Elizabeth Taylor. By her time the Egyptian language was extinct and the Greek language and culture was predominate.

The Egyptian language was not extinct. The Ptolemies spoke Greek. Cleopatra was one of the few to learn the local language in addition to Greek.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

When I read stories like this I often wonder just who and how many people are offended. I don’t move in ‘woke’ circles and maybe I’m just ignorant of the waves of offense and outrage.

Gal Gadot is gorgeous.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

Stories like this are annoying because they allow the extremist far-right to dismiss all minority concerns as trivial frippery.

-3 ( +5 / -8 )

One of the most pathetic squeals of fake/ignorant outrage over a non issue that I have had the misfortune to come across.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

I wonder what it must feel like to be so dumb to react to such frivolous crap?

Ill give it a try....

”There’s no way this lady could play Cleopatra, she’s way way too tall!”

meh

2 ( +3 / -1 )

It would be interesting if some mosaics or pottery could be found which depicted her skin color.

The first Ptolemy was Macedonian, but about three hundred years separated him from Cleopatra. Can we be certain about her DNA ancestry?

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Justice for Themyscirans!

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Alfie NoakesToday  05:10 pm JST

Stories like this are annoying because they allow the extremist far-right to dismiss all minority concerns as trivial frippery.

They’re also annoying because they allow the extremist far-left to dismiss all reasonable opinion as far-right whitewashing.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

They’re also annoying because they allow the extremist far-left to dismiss all reasonable opinion as far-right whitewashing.

Nice one. You almost got in this silly idea eh at the far-rig it has any reasonable opinions.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Nice one. You almost got in this silly idea eh at the far-rig it has any reasonable opinions.

irony is obviously not your strong suit.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

irony is obviously not your strong suit.

Neither are reasonable opinions for the far-right.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

It would be nice to go back to the day when left and right referred to the way a man dresses. I bet Cleopatra could have told us a few things about that.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Stories like this are annoying because they allow the extremist far-right to dismiss all minority concerns as trivial frippery.

"Everyone I disagree with is an extremist"

4 ( +5 / -1 )

The BBC has produced programmes in which English queens have been played by black actresses

I am out of touch with British TV, so I found this interesting. I have googled for more info, and found only one example, back in 2016, of a Black British actor playing a role based on a factual queen of England.

In "The Hollow Crown", itself based on Shakespearean plays, Sophie Okonedo played the part of Margaret of Anjou, who is based on the real-life Queen of England Margaret, and has been portrayed by white actresses in the past. 

However, the poster tokyo-m wrote 'programmes...queens...actresses...' in the plural, so there must be plenty more not showing up in search results. Can anyone shed a light?

.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

BigYenOct. 16  03:04 pm JST

It's very clear from the original artwork and mummy masks that the first Egyptians were black.

Certainly the original inhabitants were black, the ordinary people, especially in southern Egypt (the Nubians). The Ptolemaic Dynasty, though, of which Cleopatra was the last, was not. It was Greek. Even the Seleucids, with whom the Ptolemies intermarried, were Hellenistic. I think that to claim Cleopatra was black, or even mainly black, is more a triumph of wishful thinking rather than in accord with the available evidence. It wasn't "centuries and millennia" that the Ptolemies ruled for, it was 275 years, and as they frequently married their own siblings, it's hard to imagine that they would marry into the general population.

It wasn't "centuries and millennia" that the Ptolemies ruled for, it was 275 years,*

The "centuries and millennia" I referred to wasn't just the Ptolemic dynasty years. Egypt was one of the first civilizations (after China which has been around for 6000 - 7000 years). During the millenia that Egyptian civilization existed many things happened - pyramids, dynasties, ruling over Hebrews and other nations, invasions, and racial intermixing. There was even a period when Ethiopian kings ruled Egypt. So much happened in Egypt during those eras. Cleopatra was a Ptolemic ruler. She wasn't black but did she have a black ancestor from the distant past? Looking at Egypt's long history that's a possibility, a very distant one.

She certainly didn't look like Liz Taylor. It's very hard to tell her exact genetic makeup 100% but all this uproar about Gal Gadot playing her is just dumb. Her being an Israeli she is probably ethnically/racially/regionally closest to the real deal anyway.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites