entertainment

Harry Potter fan sites step back from Rowling over transgender views

5 Comments

Two of the biggest Harry Potter fan sites have distanced themselves from author J.K. Rowling because of her beliefs on transgender issues, calling them at odds with the message of empowerment in her best-selling books.

Websites The Leaky Cauldron and Mugglenet said they would no longer provide links to the British author's personal website, use photos of her, or write about achievements that do not relate to the Wizarding World she created.

The joint statement by the fan sites said Rowling's views on"marginalized people (are) out of step with the message of acceptance and empowerment we find in her books and celebrated by the Harry Potter community."

It follows a lengthy personal essay by Rowling last month in which she detailed her research and beliefs on transgender issues, including examples of where she thought demands by transgender activists were dangerous to women.

The essay was widely criticized by LGBTQ advocacy groups as divisive and transphobic.

Rowling's seven "Harry Potter" novels about a boy wizard have sold more than 500 million copies worldwide and were turned into eight blockbuster movies. She followed up with a spin-off movie franchise "Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them."

The fan sites, which together have more than one million Facebook followers, said they found it difficult to speak out against Rowling because they had admired her work for so long, but said "it would be wrong not to use our platforms to counteract the harm she has caused."

"While we don’t condone the mistreatment JKR (Rowling) has received for airing her opinions about transgender people, we must reject her beliefs," the statement added.

© Thomson Reuters 2020.

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

5 Comments
Login to comment

Insanity.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Good for the fans. JK "just kidding" Rowling is bad.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

"it would be wrong not to use our platforms to counteract the harm she has caused."

What harm? The voicing of a different opinion?

In JK Rowling's case, even if you genuinely believe (as she has said, and most of us would agree) that transgender people are entitled to live their own lives exactly as they wish, without discrimination or persecution, it's not enough. You have to accept the lot - that contrary to biology and logic male to female transgender people are no different to natural-born women, that female to male transgender people are no different to natural-born men, and most importantly of all, you have to say so out loud, so that everyone can hear you.

And if you don't? You're cancelled.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Big Yen, Exactly correct.

I and millions of others feel pretty much as Rowling does on this issue.

The mad cancel culture brigade is loud but very wrong.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

You have to accept the lot - that contrary to biology and logic male to female transgender people are no different to natural-born women, that female to male transgender people are no different to natural-born men, and most importantly of all, you have to say so out loud, so that everyone can hear you.

Except no-one has ever said this.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites