Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
entertainment

hitomi shows off maternity figure on cover of new album

39 Comments

Singer hitomi, 33, has posed nude for her new album “LOVE LIFE 2” which goes on sale June 24. The shot, which graces the front cover, is one of hitomi taken in December last year, just before the birth of her first child on Dec 23.

“I wanted to be able to show my child as well the beauty of woman at her finest,” hitomi said. Her album “LOVE LIFE,” released in 2000, also featured the singer nude on the cover.

© Japan Today

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


39 Comments
Login to comment

she's facing the wrong ( usual ) direction...............do the frontal !!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

ummm didn't Demi Moore and every other pregnant celebrity do this already? Yawn....next.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Youve worked with Hitomi?My condolences I hope your ears recovered.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Wow! I know and have worked with Hitomi in the past. Never knew her tits were that big! Ahhh the wonders of pregnancy. Women are fascinating.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Hitomi is beautiful, even here. I guess I tend to suppress and reserve that admiration for the father to be though.

That beauty is to be admired by the father to be. Not by every joker possible.

Well said Beavis.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Mark stop looking at women's body parts. It was original a couple million years ago and it's getting old.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

It all makes sense if you look at the album art for Love Life 1. She is nude on it too. I think she looks wonderful on both album covers, and I hope she had a happy and healthy baby.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

@bdaniel08

never saw a beautiful and pregnant naked woman, young beavis ?

Yeah, my wife twice. And don't get me wrong, Hitomi is beautiful, even here. I guess I tend to suppress and reserve that admiration for the father to be though.

BTW; Thanks for your assumption of my age. Was just as good as getting carded while buying a beer! ;)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

dishdash, gotta agree. she's great to look at, but the narcissism involved, ala Demi Moore too, is getting a little old.

everybody look at meeeee. no, it's not enough? ok I'll take my clothes off, now everybody look at meeeeee. still not enough? ok I'll...

ok, i get it already. you want people to look at you. now stop trying to be the center of attention and start preparing to give all your attention to someone else for a change.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Nothing else than a good copy...

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Try as I might, I can't get worked up about pregnant women. Was walking on eggshells when Mrs. Coughalot was expecting.

"Do I look fat in this?" "Look love, you're seven months pregnant. You's look big in a circus tent. Er, I mean, no, my darling, you look beautiful. I'm so proud. Please put the knife down."

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I have to say even with Hitomi this pose is getting a little old...

0 ( +0 / -0 )

beavis at 06:43 AM JST - 3rd June Well, now there's a link I shouldn't have clicked

never saw a beautiful and pregnant naked woman, young beavis ?

lol:)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Why cover some parts of your body when you are showing almost everything?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Isn't this a standard pose for pregnant women on a magazine cover?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Nice cover.Too bad her music sucks.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Absolutely beautiful

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Pregnant or not, hitomi is a site to behold in my opinion, and very sexy. Of course, this is more a 'natural' look, and beautiful.

The look has of course been done before, Demi Moore, I think, making it the famous cover shot so many have emulated since. But if a woman wants to do it herself, all the power to her.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I love Hitomi

0 ( +0 / -0 )

this is a beautiful cover image, although not very creative.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Very nice.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I think the guys who are repulsed by this picture feel so for a number of reasons, usually- A. Pregnant women, beautiful as they maybe, remind them of thier own mothers and it is difficult for a lot of men to associate thier mothers with sensuality and sexuality. Or B. Centuries of religious dogma have conditioned many men to veiw pregnant women as off limits to thier fantasies, thou shalt not covet and all that. BTW Osakadaz, not to take anything away from your post, but I'm thinking it's totally different when it's YOUR bun in the oven.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

This was original back in 1991 when Demi Moore did it on the cover of Vanity Fair. Still kind of interesting when Britney Spears did it on the cover of Bazaar magazine in 2006. Now, it's a little old.

it`s been done many times. it is no longer "new."

By that definition no one should have any interest in photos of women in bikinis, as it's been done for 40 years. What makes this different?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Very beautiful picture! Pregnant women look as beautiful as non-pregnant women. Those who hate to see pregnant women must think how your mom felt when she encountered men like you while you were inside her uterus.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Is anything musicians do really "new" anymore? This's better than your dime-a-dozen boring poses of band members or the AKB48 type "Hi, we can't fit all our members on the cover, so here's the important ones in tiny squares that still can't sing, play instruments, dance, or think for themselves but at least they're cute" album covers.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Not a fan of the pregnant look, sorry.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

yes its been done before, but those that are uncomfortable or worse with seeing a pregnant woman need their heads examined.

Cleo yes the baby was probably small, even after almost 2decades here I still cant believe how small the tykes are here I am often off by 2-3yrs(guessing low)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Beautiful.

But if that was taken 'just before the birth', it must have been a tiny little baby.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The people saying they wish they hadn't looked at this link, are you saying there's something repulsive about this picture? How very shallow.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Something different and an attempt by a pop artist to embrace and show her life change rather than just go on hiatus for a few years. I wonder if the song content is as reflective?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

anything for attention, ne

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Damn that is sexy!!!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

How can I get rid of this news?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

If fans here freak out when they hear that their favorite idol has a boyfriend, or is having sex, how does one think they would react positively to this, which is undoubtedly the result of both?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

it`s been done many times. it is no longer "new."

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"Well, now there's a link I shouldn't have clicked"

Why's that?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

This was original back in 1991 when Demi Moore did it on the cover of Vanity Fair. Still kind of interesting when Britney Spears did it on the cover of Bazaar magazine in 2006. Now, it's a little old.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Well, now there's a link I shouldn't have clicked

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites