The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2016 AFPLed Zeppelin singer tells jury he composed 'Stairway to Heaven'
LOS ANGELES©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2016 AFP
13 Comments
Login to comment
Peter Payne
If you ever listen to Japanese enka songs, you know that there are like 6 different musical riffs, and nothing more. Nothing is 100% original, and who cares?
Mike L
I really hope this goes nowhere. There was plenty of time to sue while Randy California was alive and he didn't. The only people who stand to win in this case are the lawyers on both sides.
zengohan
Definitely these two songs sound nothing alike and sounds like this guy is just using this opportunity to get some cash
Outrider
a completely spurious law suit.
JoiceRojo
They do, but nothing else, it doesn't justify a lawsuit
mistie710
It's a string of chords lasting no longer than about 3 seconds. Nothing more.
This is just yet another money grab. Simple as.
moonwatcher
It's obviously a ripoff. They have a fine history of this. Wtf.
danalawton1@yahoo.com
I listened to both versions.... and I think that Led Zeppelin stole those chords.... the similarity and timing are just too close.
fxgai
I used those chords too once. Sue me.
Angus McGillicuddy
Can't copyright a chord sequence, and it's only the opening chord sequence that's similar. This is very different from the case of "Dazed and Confused", which was straight-up plagiarism.
shallots
True: Led Zepplin has a sketchy history when it comes to plagiarism. True: they were geniuses. However, to me: The plaintiff doesn't deserve to win here. There is a minor similarity here in the opening. It's not enough to justify a writing credit or royalties.
bogva
From the hundreds of songs they played and wrote there are some they (deservedly) were sued for.
But if you go into detail you'll find out each case is specific and quite different. One can't just put a label they are thieves.
For this specific case actually I think the used the riff but slightly changed it and made it sound richer. But this part is just small intro (that returns few times) and doe not make the song or the total atmosphere of the composition. I wonder if they can sue them for this any musician can be sued for techniques they liked in others before them and tried to make them better or their way...