Mars CEO sees 'moral' duty in tackling climate change

When you design pet food, there's a huge carbon footprint difference between having lamb in the recipe or having beef.

No mention of transport of said ingredients, shipping from China I suspect is a huge footprint for these ingredients (not to mention historically deadly to the pets).

Virtue Signalling

If we care for environment, his whole company would be asked to cease activities. Today. Even yesterday. Sweet industry is even more detrimental to heatth, society , economy than booze and tobacco's. They get people addicted, but the first one targets even toddlers and kids.

Pet industry is a huge waste too, and contributes to massive animal abuse by "animal lovers".

 (not to mention historically deadly to the pets).

That they care because the "put to sleep" business is super lucrative and they lose sales if pets die before being killed... For them, ideally the pet food makes the animals chronically sick so they need regular visits to the vet ...