The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2024 AFPScientists say they can make zero-emission cement
By Nick Perry PARIS©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2024 AFP
7 Comments
Login to comment
BertieWooster
Here's an even better one: Mycelium blocks. Amazingly strong blocks grown from fungi. Not a joke: https://www.certifiedenergy.com.au/emerging-materials/emerging-materials-mycelium-brick
Zaphod
GBR48
"Save the planet" with another fancy project limited to countries who can afford it? Good grief. The planet does not need this salvation either. Maybe humanity does, but that that is another issue. It has plenty of ways of doing itself in.
Zaphod
Another bondoogle. Recycling is by definition limited to amount of buildings demolished. And how much energy is saved by transporting and reprocessing old cement is not clear.
Plus, this is not a "world first". The Swedish company Cemvision has been offering this for a while.
ian
Cambridge Electric Cement
Abe234
I think you can have both. Rich developed countries can pay for the license, which supports further research, and rewards effort, while they can also give a free license to poor countries. Personally china doesn’t copy, they steal intellectual property, even when they can pay. So it’s not impossible to hold both ideas at the same time. The US, Canada,Germany Poland France Spain, etc could pay while undeveloped countries can get a free license.
GBR48
Quote: Patent pending.
If you want the Global South/third world to do this, it needs to be free to use. And no complaints if China just copy it, because we need them to. Ditto with other green innovations. If they are not free to do, people will not switch to them. You can make a few quid from licensing, or you can save the planet. Pick one.
Moonraker
Hmmm.