The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2020.One meter or two? How social distancing affects COVID-19 risk
By Kate Kelland LONDON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
12 Comments
Login to comment
1glenn
I remember from physics class that doubling the distance from a radiating object reduces the radiation impact by 75%. Something similar could apply to virus transmission via droplets. In other words, politicians shouldn't set themselves up as health advisors without first checking with scientists and doctors.
Tommy Eddy Kookabura
My immune system says... No effect cos it takes care of it... Millions of different viruses every day... Lol...
Jonathan Prin
The more the better.
But practically speaking, one meter is already hard to maintain.
TigersTokyoDome
Yelled at an oyaji yesterday for being right up my backside in a queue. Nobody else in the queue. Either they don't get it or they think its all safe now because the emergency was withdrawn. Or they really don't care.
I lost it because I told him once. Then he continued to stand right behind me. They even have distancing tape on the floor. He is fortunate that for a foreigner getting arrested for knocking someone out in a cafe is extremely bad news for said foreigner. Back home I would have just knocked him out.
carpslidy
I don't understand the logic of 1m separation in lines, if you are facing forward even if the person behind you coughs on your back, you aren't going to get infected unless you then touch your neck and lick your hands.
Worst case you have to rub a little alcohol on your neck if your worried.
Oxycodin
Who can trust the WHO and the medical expert panel when they cant even find a solution while they use us all as guinea pigs... Really one meter droplets. have we forgotten that a mask wont prevent contraction because the virus can float around and enter your eyes and even attach to your clothes. If you really want to disinfect you need to burn your clothes with a flame thrower before entering your home. Peeps keep forgeting that the virus can launch onto your clothes, and commissary items you go out and buy. No way to prevent the spread.
Strangerland
I think I'll stick with the people who don't start their assertions with 'I don't understand the logic...' that scientists are putting out there.
Peter Neil
This is hilarious. Only someone with the IQ of a potato would say that 1 meter is ok now. Did they write a memo to the virus tasking it to comply with this new information?
Luis David Yanez
Well, all these rules are completely arbitrary bs called security theater, including all the global lockdowns.
There is no hard evidence that anything of it works, but if we make it obligatory, if we enforce these rules and make it official, then it means it works, right?
Basically governments and the Who did a 180 degree change of their long standing recommendations when people started to heavily criticize them because of pure panic.
UK, from a strategy targeting the vulnerable population, and letting those who aren't really vulnerable to continue with their lives normally, to one of the most harsh and restrictive national total lockdowns in a question of hours
ArtistAtLarge
That is incorrect and outright wrong.
Strangerland
No, they're based on scientific principles behind the degree to which the virus can propagate as droplets and/or aerosols in the air and reach another person.
But once again we have a poster on JT dismissing science because they don't understand it.
Strangerland
What? Yes there is. Countries that have been practicing social distancing and proper prevention measures have brought the virus under control.