The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.FDA strikes neutral tone ahead of vaccine booster meeting
By LAURAN NEERGAARD and MATTHEW PERRONE WASHINGTON©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
7 Comments
Login to comment
virusrex
No you did not, you only made it clear that you believe it so, and that this belief is not based on anything but your personal opinion. The expert's opinion is the opposite, and they have scientiic data to prove it. Specially when they do analysis that do include epidemiological analysis instead of just assuming things without proving them as you keep doing.
Raw Beer
What? Definitely not. I made it very clear for quite a while that vaccines actually have very little effect on the spread. Though some like to give the vaccines all the credit when case reductions happen to coincide with vaccinations.
virusrex
Do you think vaccines are the only factor that affect how the pandemic spreads? there is a reason why epidemiological analysis is necessary to actually understand this, an unvalid asumption (that every other factor remained the same except for boosters, or that the cases were in the people that recieved them) are terribly obvious mistakes that make people that are not experts reach completely wrong conclusions.
Raw Beer
When they started administering boosters in Israel, the cases did go down for a few days, but then shot right back up. Are they all unboosted?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPLLdLzept4
Strangerland
If you're basing your evaluation on rumor, then you're correct. But if you're basing your evaluation on data, then your premise above is silly.
cla68
Lol, big pharma undermines its own vaccines by advocating for subsequent booster shots. It’s almost as if they have a different motive than conquering the virus.