Wearing a protective mask, dog walker Leslie Kramer ventures out as heavy smoke from northern Alberta forest fires comes south to blanket the downtown area in Calgary, Canada, on May 16. Photo: Larry MacDougal/The Canadian Press via AP
health

How wildfire smoke can harm human health, even when the fire is hundreds of miles away

10 Comments
By Christopher T Migliaccio

Smoke from more than 200 wildfires burning across Canada has been turning skies hazy in North American cities far from the flames. We asked Chris Migliaccio, a toxicologist at the University of Montana who studies the impact of wildfire smoke on human health, about the health risks people can face when smoke blows in from distant wildfires.

What’s in wildfire smoke that’s a problem?

When we talk about air quality, we often talk about PM2.5. That’s particulate matter 2.5 microns or smaller – small enough that it can travel deep into the lungs.

Exposure to PM2.5 from smoke or other air pollution, such as vehicle emissions, can exacerbate health conditions like asthma and reduce lung function in ways that can worsen existing respiratory problems and even heart disease.

But the term PM2.5 only tells you about size, not composition – what is burning can make a significant difference in the chemistry.

In the northern Rockies, where I live, most fires are fueled by vegetation, but not all vegetation is the same. If the fire is in the wildland urban interface, manufactured fuels from homes and vehicles may also be burning, and that’s going to create its own toxic chemistry. Chemists usually talk about volatile organic compounds, (VOCs), carbon monoxide and PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons produced when biomass and other matter burns having the potential to harm human health.

How does inhaling wildfire smoke harm human health?

If you have ever been around a campfire and got a blast of smoke in your face, you probably had some irritation. With exposure to wildfire smoke, you might also get some irritation in the nose and throat and maybe some inflammation.

As with a lot of things, the dose makes the poison – almost anything can be harmful at a certain dose.

Generally, cells in the lungs called alveolar macrophages will pick up the particulates and clear them out – at reasonable doses. It’s when the system gets overwhelmed that you can have a problem.

One concern is that smoke can suppress macrophage function, altering it enough that you become more susceptible to respiratory infection. A colleague who looked at lag time in the effect of wildfire smoke exposure found an increase in influenza cases after a bad fire season. Studies in developing countries have also found increases in respiratory infections with people who are cooking on open fires in homes.

The stress of an inflammatory response can also exacerbate existing health problems. Being exposed to wood smoke won’t independently cause someone to have a heart attack, but if they have underlying risk factors, such as significant plaque buildup, the added stress can increase the risk.

Researchers are also studying potential effects on the brain and nervous system from inhaled particulate matter.

When smoke blows over long distances, does its toxicity change?

We know that the chemistry of wildfire smoke changes. The longer it’s in the atmosphere, the more the chemistry will be altered by ultraviolet light, but we still have a lot to learn.

Researchers have found that there seems to be a higher level of oxidation, so oxidants and free radicals are being generated the longer smoke is in the air. The specific health effects aren’t yet clear, but there’s some indication that more exposure leads to greater health effects.

The supposition is that more free radicals are generated the longer smoke is in atmosphere and exposed to UV light, so there’s a greater potential for health harm. A lot of that, again, comes down to dose.

Chances are, if you’re a healthy individual, going for a bike ride or a hike in light haze won’t be a big deal, and your body will be able to recover.

If you’re doing that every day for a month in wildfire smoke, however, that raises more concerns. I’ve worked on studies with residents at Seeley Lake in Montana who were exposed to hazardous levels of PM2.5 from wildfire smoke for 49 days in 2017. We found a decrease in lung function a year later. No one was on oxygen, but there was a significant drop.

This is a relatively new area of research, and there’s still a lot we’re learning, especially with the increase in wildfire activity as the planet warms.

What precautions can people take to reduce their risk from wildfire smoke?

If there is smoke in the air, you want to decrease your exposure.

Can you completely avoid the smoke? Not unless you’re in a hermetically sealed home. The PM levels aren’t much different indoors and out unless you have a really good HVAC system, such as those with MERV 15 or better filters. But going inside decreases your activity, so your breathing rate is slower and the amount of smoke you’re inhaling is likely lower.

We also tend to advise people that if you’re in a susceptible group, such as those with asthma, create a safe space at home and in the office with a high-level stand-alone air filtration system to create a space with cleaner air.

Some masks can help. It doesn’t hurt to have a high-quality N95 mask. Just wearing a cloth mask won’t do much, though.

Most states have air quality monitors that can give you a sense of how bad the air quality is, so check those sites and act accordingly.

Christopher T Migliaccio** is a toxicologist at the University of Montana who studies the impact of wildfire smoke on human health.**

The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.

© The Conversation

©2023 GPlusMedia Inc.

10 Comments
Login to comment

The recent show, Extrapolations paints a very vivid and bleak picture of exactly how smoke from wildfires and forest fires can devastate the planet. It's disturbing.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Smoke, whatever the cause, is terrible to breathe. It is a leading cause of cancer and early death for firemen.

Several times over the years I and my family have had to breathe heavy smoke from fires around the California southland, and it is not something I want to repeat. When possible, we just get up and leave, to somewhere we can breathe. A mask like the one in the picture is almost useless. I have used charcoal filter masks in the smoke, but those are very uncomfortable to wear, and near impossible to sleep in.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

About a decade ago there was an article, including satellite picture, in one of my fave magazines, Scientific American, about the smog generated in China from their coal fired power plants. The pictures from space showed the clouds forming over China, then going to North America, then Europe, and then back to China, and around the world again, before finally dissipating.

Both forest fires and burning coal create terrible smoke.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

This is a relatively new area of research, and there’s still a lot we’re learning, especially with the increase in wildfire activity as the planet warms.

One big part of the research describing the negative effects of human activity originated climate change is that experts can identify increasing risk on areas where the knowledge is still spotty and redirect resources to improve the understanding of those areas. With a little luck preventive measures against these increased risks can be also developed before lives are lost unnecessarily.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

Wildfires are part of the natural cycle.

No mention of alleged "human activity" is mentioned in the article.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Wildfires are part of the natural cycle.

Which does nothing to refute the fact that they are a very negative influence on human health, specially considering that they are predicted to be more important.

No mention of alleged "human activity

Climate change has been proved to be produced by human activity and climate change has been correlated to increase of fires, not everything has to be mentioned in the article to be true.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Which does nothing to refute the fact that they are a very negative influence on human health, specially considering that they are predicted to be more important.

A naturally occurring wildfire and the resulting smoke would have a natural effect on human health, naturally.

No one is refuting anything from the article.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

A naturally occurring wildfire and the resulting smoke would have a natural effect on human health, naturally

Endlessly repeating "naturally" is if was not a negative effect is not an argument, as many other natural things this is something worth preventing as much as possible.

Seeing human activity is the primary factor driving climate change, and that climate change has been concluded to increase the frequency and strength of wildfires (as mentioned in the article) that clearly supports the fact that decreasing this climate change obviously also works at reducing the risk from the smoke in human health.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

The rhythm of nature and naturally occurring wildfires are part of the process.

The fact these occur without human intervention let us see that nature has a purpose and function for these events.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

The fact these occur without human intervention let us see that nature has a purpose and function for these events.

The predicted increase is not cyclical nor natural is a consequence of human activity causing climate change which in turn increases the frequency and destruction done by the wildfires, the article explicitly mentions this, for you to say this just a natural cycle without increased risk you first need to demonstrate the experts included in the article are wrong. Without this requisite the contrary conclusion they have compared with yours is simply much more valuable since it is supported by the evidence and scientific method used to reach it.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites