The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.Living longer can mean more dementia but there are ways to reduce the risk
By LAURAN NEERGAARD WASHINGTON©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
13 Comments
Login to comment
Hercolobus
Avoid oils from grains. That means anything fried. For that matter eating bentos and at restaurants
Wick's pencil
Good points, except that last one. I'm not convinced about cholesterol, despite the reported correlations.
iraira
@Wick's pencil
For LDL-cholesterol, there is a plethora of data showing a link to dementia.
"Having high cholesterol in our 40s, 50s and 60s is associated with an increased risk of dementia." (https://www.alzheimersresearchuk.org/dementia-information/dementia-risk/cholesterol-and-dementia-risk/)
"In a population of initially-healthy older adults aged ≥75 years, high HDL-C levels were associated with increased risk of all-cause dementia." (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanwpc/article/PIIS2666-6065(23)00281-X/fulltext)
"High intake of dietary cholesterol was associated with a decreased risk of all-cause dementia and AD dementia." (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37874096/)
Wick's pencil
Yes, association. But causation? I'm not convinced.
Namahage
Good Lord.
The answer is,if you really want to set records and outlive your peers, abstain from everything and focus purely on yourself.
If you want to consider your family, friends,and quality of life,do what you want,whetyou want,and b*gger the consequences.
As long as I don't become a burden upon others,I am content.
virusrex
The specialist on human health are, if someone said that he is not convinced the moon is real, would that have importance?
The arrival of statins allowed for interventional research to prove reducing cholesterol comes with better cardiac health, that put the final nail on the coffin of the antiscientific denialists that like to pretend medical science is wrong for personal profit.
virusrex
Sorry, "cardiac health" is of course another thing affected by cholesterol, but as a reply in this topic "mental health" is the appropriate one.
Raw Beer
No, they showed that statins are effective at reducing LDL, but interestingly have little if any effect on cardiac health.
iron man
VR
The arrival of statins allowed for interventional research to prove reducing cholesterol comes with better cardiac health, that put the final nail on the coffin of the antiscientific denialists that like to pretend medical science is wrong for personal profit.
Sure but dragged many into the private health /docs, YIKES you got a blockage, stent $$$, thanks R.B but what about dementia???
healthy, exercise, don't bang your heads, great advice until the inevitable A-disease becomes us animals. med science is making great advances in early recognition of Alz, Dem, C. but the unrelenting A disease will always prosper.
Wick's pencil
Did you read it?
Pretty useless. It just tells us that statins lower LDL, or "bad cholesterol".
wallace
Denis Law a great Scottish footballer died at 86 from dementia which has become a major concern within the game because "heading the ball" over a playing life might be a cause of it.
Speed
Also get a good night sleep as much as possible. There's also a link between sleep insufficiency and dementia.
virusrex
On the contrary, they have prove statins are effective protecting cardiac health and even that they appear very strongly to help also with mental decline.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/how-statin-drugs-protect-the-heart
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/statins-may-help-lower-dementia-risk
Fortunately most of the world have much more reasonable health services than the US, so there is no real downside to having better outcomes. A doctor making a profit from saving a life is much better than a grifter making a profit from misleading them into dying an early and preventable death.
The well recognized institution makes an article about a scientific source that proves statins side effects are hugely outweighed by the benefits they give for the patients, that is not useless, it would indicate only that you have a systematic bias and would like to ignore what the institutions of science say. Do you have any example where an institution as respected contradicts this conclusion?