The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2014 AFPUltrasounds, CT scans equal at finding kidney stones
WASHINGTON©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
Video promotion
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2014 AFP
3 Comments
Login to comment
globalwatcher
YEP.
Low Dose CT scan (radiation) has been used too much for no reason. Ultrasound and MRI need to be tried first.
jazz350
CT scans have a very high level of radiation and should be avoided except for very serious conditions. The routine scans are a way to rake in the dough, need strict regulations to stop this disgusting practice.
Frungy
Half true.
Ultrasounds should be used as a first step as it is cheap, fast and effective in the majority of cases, however, about a small percentage of kidney stones (about 5%) will not show up on an ultrasound. These include uric acid and cystine stones, which are lucent (not easily visible on x-rays or ultrasounds) as they are not comprised on calcium.
Therefore ultrasounds are not "just as effective as CT scans". CT scans are necessarily for detecting certain classes of kidney stones.
The main thrust of the article is correct, that an ultrasound should be the starting point, but the phrasing is misleading.