Japan Today
health

Ultrasounds, CT scans equal at finding kidney stones

3 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2014 AFP

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
Video promotion

Niseko Green Season 2025


3 Comments
Login to comment

YEP.

Low Dose CT scan (radiation) has been used too much for no reason. Ultrasound and MRI need to be tried first.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

CT scans have a very high level of radiation and should be avoided except for very serious conditions. The routine scans are a way to rake in the dough, need strict regulations to stop this disgusting practice.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Ultrasounds are just as effective as CT scans at finding kidney stones and should be used as a first step to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure, U.S. researchers say

Half true.

Ultrasounds should be used as a first step as it is cheap, fast and effective in the majority of cases, however, about a small percentage of kidney stones (about 5%) will not show up on an ultrasound. These include uric acid and cystine stones, which are lucent (not easily visible on x-rays or ultrasounds) as they are not comprised on calcium.

Therefore ultrasounds are not "just as effective as CT scans". CT scans are necessarily for detecting certain classes of kidney stones.

The main thrust of the article is correct, that an ultrasound should be the starting point, but the phrasing is misleading.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites