Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
Lingerie brand Peach John has released some items for couples for the Valentine season in collaboration with Disney.
Cute hand-drawn Mickey Mouse images adorn men’s underwear, while Minnie Mouse appears on the women’s panties. If you manage to put the two pairs together, it looks like Mickey and Minnie are kissing each other.
The pajamas feature Mickey and Minnie holding hands — white for men and pink for women. There is also a Minnie tank top for women with polka dots and frills.
Peach John says these products are ideal for couples who get a buzz out of wearing matching clothes in secret.
Price: 4,900 yen (women’s pajamas), 5,500 yen (men’s pajamas), 2,300 yen (women’s underwear), 2,500 yen (men’s underwear), 2,400 yen (Minnie tank top)
They are only available online.
© Source: Fashionsnap.com, PEACH JOHN
13 Comments
Login to comment
Gurukun
LOL!
risamamachan
Secret is the best policy. Only know between two makes their relation deeper.
Ranger_Miffy2
Ridiculous and truly dislike the Mice Couple, but have to admit these made me smile.
LoveNot
These are panties for kids in Kindergarten. Adults in such would be ridiculous. On a manly man it would be a turn off.
Andrew Matthews
Of course - if the people wearing them are on the other side of each other - it looks they they are not talking.
ExportExpert
Kiss me Mick
AmericanForeigner
very japanese. very childish.
some14some
agreed, they are missing business from One Million foreign residents in Japan :)
MaboDofuIsSpicy
Not true some14something. Lots of men wear women's panties. Check it out on the net. Panties for both is big business here. My girl friend got me Hello Kitty panties and I proudly wear them. Wish they had a slot in the front though for using a urinal. Other than that, very soft.
johninnaha
I misread this. I thought it was peach flavored undies. That might be interesting.
cactusJack
In my case, Mickey would have an enormous butt.
Serrano
Real men don't wear Mickey Mouse underpants.
m5c32
I guess that depends on the degree of "lots". So yeah, for some definition of lots, that would be true. Not so much as a proportion of the general population. But it would be true amongst the population of secret women's knicker wearers.