'Willful ignorance': Flood-hit Australia urged to rethink climate change

By Michael Taylor

Australia, now battling its worst floods in more than half a century, has failed to adapt fast enough to the growing threats it faces from the impacts of climate change, with its people now suffering the effects of "willful ignorance", analysts warn.

Heavy rains hit several parts of the country last week, sweeping away houses, roads and livestock and cutting off entire towns in the east. Dangerous flash floods killed two people and more than 40,000 people were forced to flee their homes.

"They call Australia 'disaster alley' because we've got a bit of everything," said Karl Mallon, CEO of Sydney-based Climate Valuation, which advises homeowners and buyers on climate and extreme weather risks.

As global warming accelerates, it is bringing fiercer storms, floods and heatwaves, more severe droughts and a growing risk of bushfires to Australia.

"It's a shame on us that we haven't tackled this already... We've got every incentive and the money to do it, it's just that we're not looking at it," Mallon told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Despite knowing about climate change since the 1980s, Australia continues to build homes in floodplains, he noted.

The problem is often rooted in "willful ignorance", he said, citing government reliance on land taxes, builders and developers putting profits before safety from climate threats, and homeowners seeking to minimize insurance payments.

Property buyers are given little information on flood risks, either by local government or banks and insurers, Mallon said.

"Sometimes the first time they find out is when they get hit and they say 'I didn't know I was in a flood zone'," he added.

Richie Merzian, climate and energy program director at think-tank The Australia Institute, said so far the approach to adapting to climate change impacts has been disjointed between federal, state and council levels, curbing resilience.

"The federal government seems allergic to any mention of climate change which hampers smart policy responses," he said.

Last year's bushfires - which Prime Minister Scott Morrison dubbed Australia's "black summer" - killed more than 30 people, destroyed wildlife and razed over 24 million hectares.

When the crisis hit, Morrison's deputy was reported to have partly blamed "self-combusting piles of manure".

Meanwhile, the health of Australia's Great Barrier Reef, the world's most extensive and spectacular coral reef ecosystem, is in a critical state and deteriorating as climate change heats up the waters where it lies, conservation groups say.

"The first thing is to acknowledge that climate impacts will get worse and that 'one-in-100-years' type events will become more common, and we need to plan for that reality," said Cam Walker, campaigns coordinator at Friends of the Earth Australia.

To deal with the risks, a region-based approach to adaptation should be crafted that allows for joined-up responses between different levels of government and communities, he said.

Mallon said government, mortgage lenders and insurers needed to offer homeowners incentives to upgrade and better protect their properties, ensuring roofs are stronger against storms and flood barriers built around high-risk buildings.

At a municipal level, increased drainage, better sea walls and modern fire-fighting equipment would help, he added.

To reduce damage from bushfires, he advised at-risk property owners to clear guttering of flammable materials, install sprinklers and shutters that keep out embers, and use fire-retardant paint.


Australia has sophisticated weather monitoring systems and has been able to issue flood warnings and evacuate those in harm's way, potentially saving thousands of lives, said Merzian at The Australia Institute.

But despite the country's vulnerability to climate impacts, the government has been slow to conduct a national climate assessment or prepare a National Adaptation Plan, he said.

In January, Australia's environment minister committed to produce a new climate resilience and adaptation strategy this year, which it is due to publish before the COP26 U.N. climate talks in November.

As part of the initiative, Canberra said it would invest an initial A$12.9 million ($9.8 million) to prepare for disasters.

Protecting and restoring wetlands, mangroves and forests would help shield communities from floods and storms, while more trees in cities would also ease the effects of heat, green groups say.

Changing crops and tilling practices, and introducing livestock breeds that can tolerate drier conditions, are other options to combat droughts, said Will Steffen, a climate scientist at the Australian National University.

But conservative governments have been reluctant to change well-established practices in the agriculture and construction sectors, he said, adding that climate change has become "a partisan political issue".


Environmentalists say Australia is its own worst enemy due to its continued reliance on coal-fired power, which makes it one of the world's largest carbon-emitters per capita.

Green groups have long lobbied the government to ditch fossil fuels and set a goal to become carbon-neutral by 2050 - so far with little success.

"The government's failure to significantly cut emissions puts Australia and the Pacific region at risk of more fires, floods and cyclones," said Martin Zavan, campaigner at Greenpeace Australia Pacific.

"When it comes to adaptation, you can't put a band-aid on a bullet-hole and expect it to get better," he added.

Friends of the Earth's Walker noted that Australia had produced 240 reports on natural disasters since 1920, but citizens were still suffering the consequences.

"Adaptation without (emissions) mitigation means surrender on the issue of climate change," he said.

© Thomson Reuters Foundation

©2021 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

"They call Australia 'disaster alley' because we've got a bit of everything," said Karl Mallon, CEO of Sydney-based Climate Valuation, which advises homeowners and buyers on climate and extreme weather risks.

There are a lot of uncomfortable truths for Australia in this article, but Mr Karl Mallon doesn't do the cause or his organization much good with his hyperbole, which looks to be calculated as much to help his business along as it is to the cause of combating climate change. "Disaster Alley", for example, is a term applied to the Asia-Pacific region as a whole, of which Australia is only a part.

Property buyers are given little information on flood risks, either by local government or banks and insurers, Mallon said... Sometimes the first time they find out is when they get hit and they say 'I didn't know I was in a flood zone'," he added.

Since when is it the job of local government, banks or insurers to give out that information? If you're a prospective homebuyer, it's up to you to to take the initiative, do your due diligence and check out the area you're interested in, including flood and bushfire risks, especially if it's an area you don't know. That can include contacting local councils, real estate agents (although double-check anything they say) but banks? How would they know? Insurers? Really?

Australia's conservative government is only being dragged reluctantly into recognizing the risks associated with a changing climate, beholden as they are to traditional energy and agricultural interests. The problem for them with continuing that line is that even traditionally conservative electorates are changing, becoming more aware of environmental issues and demanding change from their leaders. Losing their voter base, and consequently their power, is what's most likely to bring governments around to recognizing the risks of climate change and actually committing themselves to do something about it.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Building homes in a flood plain? Why not just build them below the high tide line, during low tide?

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Austrailia is not the sole cause of global warming. Not even close.

But for their government to be willfully obtuse and even obstructionist, is inexcusable.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

This issue of building homes in cheap flood plain lands is one that has irked me for many years. Over here in California there are many areas where housing has expanded into what can be described as flood plains. The climate over here is such that once or twice every hundred years we get extreme rainfall events. In the last few decades thousands of houses and trailer parks have been built in what are dry riverbeds, but which riverbeds will likely be killing grounds in the future. It is totally avoidable, but will not be avoided.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites