Here
and
Now

opinions

Is Kim Jong Un really ready to make a deal?

9 Comments
By ERIC TALMADGE

President Donald Trump used his biggest stage of the year to announce he will hold his second summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

Trump announced during his State of the Union address that he intends to meet Kim on Feb. 27-28 in Vietnam, saying that although much work remains to be done toward peace on the Korean Peninsula, his relationship with Kim is a good one.

But is Kim really ready to make a deal?

Here's why the stakes will be higher this time around.

LOWERING EXPECTATIONS

Trump's announcement of the summit's timing and location was expected. He had been teasing it for weeks. But he kept his North Korea remarks surprisingly short.

After dramatically asserting that if he hadn't been elected president, the U.S. and North Korea would be fighting a major war now, he acknowledged that much work remains to be done. That's quite a shift from his claim right after his June summit with Kim in Singapore that the nuclear threat from the North was over.

The president's tune changed in other ways as well.

The word denuclearization was nowhere to be found. Neither was anything specific about what he achieved in Singapore or what specifically he intends to get out of another meeting.

Trump is smart to give himself a lot of wiggle room.

U.S. intelligence chiefs believe there is little likelihood Kim will voluntarily give up his nuclear weapons or missiles capable of carrying them.

Nevertheless, efforts to nail down the logistics and an agenda for the summit do appear to be on track. Just before Trump spoke, the U.S. special envoy for North Korea, Stephen Biegun, reportedly flew to Pyongyang to try to flesh out summit logistics and an agenda.

GOOD REASON FOR CAUTION

After a year of heightening threats, and in sharp contrast with the standoffish policies of President Barack Obama, Trump got a lot of credit for simply being willing to open a dialogue with the North and to meet directly with Kim.

Trump's claim that he has played a big role in calming things down is also true, though he helped raise those tensions to begin with through his inflammatory rhetoric and policy of "maximum pressure" to further squeeze the North's economy and isolate it from the global financial system.

But now that the ice has been broken, just sitting down with Kim won't likely win Trump more kudos.

Previous presidents refused to meet with Kim and his predecessors because they did not want to legitimize them or bolster their status. Kim got all that and more in Singapore.

Trump needs to prove his relationship with Kim has a purpose that goes beyond photo ops. In his speech, Trump stressed that the North has returned Americans who had been jailed and has not launched any long-range missiles in 15 months.

Kim announced all of that before the Singapore summit, however.

There's a real risk this time around that if Trump can't nail down a significant win on the denuclearization front, he could find himself working in direct opposition to his own main objective. Instead of getting Kim to give up his nukes, any tacit acceptance of the status quo could embolden Kim to dig in further as the leader of the world's newest nuclear power.

KIM'S MULTIPLE TARGETS

In the hope of getting sanctions relief and possibly a peace treaty to formally end the Korean War, Kim has offered Trump some goodies. He has suggested he is willing to dismantle some nuclear and missile-related facilities, and as Trump pointed out, has maintained his self-proclaimed moratorium on nuclear and long-range missile testing.

But he has been careful not to put all his eggs in Trump's basket.

Rebuilding ties with South Korea and China is the cornerstone of Kim's bigger strategy. He has already met Chinese leader Xi Jinping four times and South Korean President Moon Jae-in three times.

Kim has an immediate interest in wooing the Chinese and South Koreans. He wants investment and trade to bolster his economy and help fund infrastructure projects. Beijing and Seoul are already suggesting they believe sanctions against the North should be eased sooner rather than later, despite the Trump administration's stance that denuclearization must come first.

Weakening Seoul's security alliance with Washington is another of Kim's goals.

He scored big in Singapore when Trump agreed to put off joint military exercises with the South, and again when Trump started publicly questioning the value of such exercises and demanding Seoul pay a bigger share of the cost of its own national defense.

Seoul just agreed to boost its share, so that's a win for Trump. But the reportedly rancorous process appears to have also undercut the South's confidence in Washington.

The biggest annual U.S.-South Korea exercise, meanwhile, is normally held in March or April. It was postponed and scaled down last to year to ease tensions during the Pyeongchang Winter Olympics.

U.S. officials have said it will likely be scaled down this year as well.

Eric Talmadge, the only American journalist who works regularly in North Korea, has been the AP's Pyongyang bureau chief since 2013.

© Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.


9 Comments
Login to comment

Ironically, Democrats are hoping the summit fails. They’d rather risk a nuclear war than for President Trump to have another win.

-3 ( +5 / -8 )

Photo opp. For Kim.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

U.S. intelligence chiefs believe there is little likelihood Kim will voluntarily give up his nuclear weapons or missiles capable of carrying them.

Kim will never give those up. He's looking for recognition as a member of the "nuclear club," something previous US presidents refused to supply. With Trump, though, Kim sees a useful fool.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

“Ironically, Democrats are hoping the summit fails.”

Agree. For whatever reason or other, they don’t want Trump / Pompeo to have any progress with Pyongyang. Meanwhile, Japan doesn’t have to worry about missiles flying over their heads.

Its like, the democrats keep forgetting that the North Korean Regime are the bad guys, NOT the Americans.

1 ( +5 / -4 )

Ironically, Democrats are hoping the summit fails.

The Republicans are the ones who want it to fail. That’s clear as day.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Is Kim Jong Un really ready to make a deal?

He had better be. He understands the alternative.

Ironically, Democrats are hoping the summit fails.

The Republicans are the ones who want it to fail. That’s clear as day.

What makes you say that, Stranger?

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Wc62six says, "Its like, the democrats keep forgetting that the North Korean Regime are the bad guys, NOT the Americans". How many military disputes has NK been involved in in the last 70 years? How many military disputes has the US been involved in, how many elected governments has the US been involved in, how many sovereign nations has the US invaded in the last 70 years? How many military disputes in the US currently involved in? In the last 70 years the US has caused mayhem and misery in its attempt to dominate and bully the globe. Kim should NOT give up nuclear weapons until the US and Israel does likewise. Any nation without a nuclear program will be at risk to the same treatment as Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria... at the hands of the warmongering US.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

How many military disputes has NK been involved in in the last 70 years?

Quite a few. Just ask the South Koreans.

@riperez Why does the "warmongering" U.S. keep paying 22% of the UN's budget?

0 ( +1 / -1 )

NK Fatso is just plain evil.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites