Here
and
Now

opinions

Legacy of 2010s will be growing international and political divisions

6 Comments
By Peter Apps

As a new decade begins, the first century of the new millennium will already be a fifth over. The last 10 years have seen the world's most powerful states increasingly at loggerheads, with rising political divisions in almost every country on earth. The next may well see at least some of those trends produce a crisis, perhaps even a major turning point in global affairs.

While the last decade has arguably been defined largely by trends and series of events – the Arab Spring, the rise of Trump, Brexit and nationalism, growing strains between the West, Russia and China – the first decade of the century is remembered much more for its twin shocks, 9/11 and the 2008 financial crash. The next decade may well see another financial shock of similar, perhaps even greater, magnitude – hitting a world in many ways much less prepared or coordinated to ride it out.

What is also becoming more likely, however, is another defining 9/11-type event of geopolitical violence, possibly involving nuclear force or some other form of mass destruction, perhaps even a devastating cyber attack that kills large numbers through crippling critical national infrastructure such as water supplies or power plants. Like 9/11, that could come from a non-state actor – but it could also be an act of state-on-state violence at a time of growing international tension, potentially igniting a devastating wider conflict.

At the very least, politics looks set to become more idiosyncratic and unpredictable. In the short term at least, populist forces – whether pro-democracy protesters in Hong Kong or leftist, right-wing and environmental movements in the West – are unlikely to go away. Raised geopolitical tensions will also flow through into international business and markets - as the U.S.-China trade war and headwinds faced by China's Huawei already show. So too will the growing strains between governments and the world's largest tech firms – Google, Facebook, Amazon and others. That will be supercharged by technological change, perhaps in the form of electric vehicles and other robots that could throw millions out of work.

Next year's U.S. election will set much of the tone for the coming decade. An unexpected defeat for President Donald Trump might be seen as the beginning of the end for a new generation of democratic, often right-wing populists that also includes Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro. But what seems at least as likely for now, however, is that even amid impeachment proceedings against him, whoever emerges from the fractured Democratic field will be unable to defeat the American president.

What a Trump second term might look like is even harder to predict than the first – the president would in many senses be more unfettered and more at home in a government system from which he has already dismissed most of those advisers like former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis previously seen to have constrained him. At the same time, however, his inability to run for a third term might simply leave him bored or looking for a legacy, whatever that might mean.

A Democratic victory could put the United States in almost equally uncharted territory, particularly if the candidate were a left-wing challenger such as Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. Even without that, like other left of centre parties around the world, the Democrats will continue to be divided between left-wing, environmentalist forces favored by younger activists and a more centrist, conservative track – a battle that will likely continue through the decade and beyond.

CLOSELY WATCHED

In Europe, the two elections that will set the tone will be Germany's federal elections between August and October 2021 and France's presidential vote the following year. In both, the greatest question will be how well the far right performs. As in the United States, each election will also be closely watched for pointers on the future of the left and centre-left. Such parties performed unexpectedly well in 2019 in Spain, Portugal, Finland, Denmark and elsewhere – although catastrophically in Britain. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern will also face a close race to keep her job in the second half of 2020.

Even bigger questions, however, linger over the world's more autocratic states. By the end of the decade, Russia's Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Xinping will be in their late seventies, facing greater competition from younger rivals. Both appear likely to become more authoritarian, but Xi looks set to face ever greater challenges in Hong Kong and perhaps elsewhere.

How that is handled could set the tone for much of the rest of the decade – already, China's internment of more than 1 million ethnic Muslim Uighurs is attracting growing condemnation, and a highly public crackdown in Hong Kong would do so even more. Beijing also still clearly has ambitions to restore control over Taiwan, which it regards as a renegade province. Both Moscow and Beijing look set to continue ramping up their saber-rattling against neighbors and the West, potentially raising the prospect of new Cuban Missile Crisis-style standoffs that might lead to something worse.

Even without that, the early years of the coming decade look set to see a further escalation of many of the proxy confrontations that have driven the bloodiest wars of recent years, particularly Syria, Yemen and Ukraine. Last week saw China, Russia and Iran announce joint naval drills in the Gulf and stepped-up U.S. military action against Iranian-backed forces in Iraq and Syria. Moscow's military intervention in Syria from 2015 took many in the West by surprise, and the coming decade could yet see Beijing too take a more assertive path overseas.

Whether the world is prepared for any of these trends remains a very open question. The first two decades of the century have proved rather different to what many expected. The next looks at least as unpredictable.

Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century; PS21, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank. Paralyzed by a war-zone car crash in 2006, he also blogs about his disability and other topics. He was previously a reporter for Reuters and continues to be paid by Thomson Reuters. Since 2016, he has been a member of the British Army Reserve and the UK Labour Party, and is an active fundraiser for the party.

© Thomson Reuters 2020. ml

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

6 Comments
Login to comment

Legacy of 2010s will be growing international and political divisions

I don't think these divisions are going to decrease anytime soon- I think they'll escalate

3 ( +3 / -0 )

A hundred years from now, if we humans are still around, people will still be talking about the disastrous Trump presidency.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

1glennJan. 7 11:17 am JSTA hundred years from now, if we humans are still around, people will still be talking about the disastrous Trump presidency.

This entire planet seems to ruled - nation by nation, one X one by churlish unqualified immature self-deified disgusting diaper-clad demagogic boorish Caligulas. I remember the peaceful end of the Cold War 30 years ago this time and the promise of possible peace + understanding has been broken by a bunch of loudmouth cretin nitwits.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

1glennJan. 7 11:17 am JSTA hundred years from now, if we humans are still around, people will still be talking about the disastrous Trump presidency.

This entire planet now seems to be ruled - nation by nation, one X one by churlish unqualified immature self-deified disgusting diaper-clad demagogic boorish Caligulas. I remember the peaceful end of the Cold War 30 years ago this time and the promise of possible peace + understanding has been broken by a bunch of loudmouth cretin nitwits.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

https://www.newsweek.com/us-defeat-iran-war-navy-1429348

Seems to me that Trump killed Suleimani for purely political reasons; to take heat off of his Ukraine scandal. His disregard for both morality and practicality lead me to think that he may be tempted to go to war with Iran for political reasons. We have seen it before; Karl Rove warned Bush in 2003 that if he did not go to war with Iraq, Bush would lose the next election. Bush won the next election.

Among other problems with going to war with Iran, is the reality that the US Navy might be decimated by asymmetrical attacks, as revealed in the US Navy's own war game simulations. Inevitably, the USN comes out much the worse in a war with Iran, in these simulations. But, Trump does not consult experts, ever, and seems to think that a show of force is beneficial to him personally.

May God help us all.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

1glennJan. 8 07:48 am JSThttps://www.newsweek.com/us-defeat-iran-war-navy-1429348

Seems to me that Trump killed Suleimani for purely political reasons; to take heat off of his Ukraine scandal. His disregard for both morality and practicality lead me to think that he may be tempted to go to war with Iran for political reasons. We have seen it before; Karl Rove warned Bush in 2003 that if he did not go to war with Iraq, Bush would lose the next election. Bush won the next election.

Among other problems with going to war with Iran, is the reality that the US Navy might be decimated by asymmetrical attacks, as revealed in the US Navy's own war game simulations. Inevitably, the USN comes out much the worse in a war with Iran, in these simulations. But, Trump does not consult experts, ever, and seems to think that a show of force is beneficial to him personally.

May God help us all.

Gotta look tough. When Clinton was impeached he launched Operation Desert Fox, a week long air war on Iraq based on phony premises. And his impeachment was a total sham based on something stupid most people in US government do.

This is worse and much more serious. Of course it's political, no doubt about it. Where Operation Desert Fox resulted in no US casualties (a 'clean war' for us, but who really cares about Iraqi dead anyway - right?), a war with Iran would be much worse. Besides, ain't the US at war with ISIL now anyway?

No wait! Oceana isn't at war with Eurasia, it's with Eastasia! Always has been, always - oh, screw it!!!!!!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites