Here
and
Now

opinions

Hillary for president? 3 reasons for and against

15 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2014 AFP

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.

15 Comments
Login to comment

I'm sure a lot of the Secret Service would not like to work for her again; she was known as one of the most abusive occupants of the White House, and treated all the staff pretty badly...

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Listen, Flame away, but if she becomes president, I'm running and far. I will go to another country same week, pack up and just leave. Her comment about hurt and her husband being some of the poorest in the country made my brain implode... stupidity does not belong in office and its worn its welcome over the long years. This has nothing to do with what ever gender, it has to do with her serious lack of wisdom, I will never let such a person be in charge of my rights, No way in hell.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

sorry Her and Her Husband*

0 ( +2 / -2 )

I'm all for seeing a woman become POTUS, just not this one. Her lack of concrete results and the Benghazi issue are going to be major hurdles for her, and I don't see her having the intellect or the charisma to overcome them. Only corruption and brutality will get her past those hurdles, and the US doesn't want a tyrant in charge. She might have a lot of experience, but she clearly knows nothing about her fellow Americans; a fatal flaw possessed by too many politicians these days. If she cannot connect with the people and deliver on her promises to them, she's going nowhere.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

You KNOW a country is in BAD, BAD shape when one of the TOP THREE reasons to elect somebody is because they are: (black.. a woman... Muslim... gay... transgendered... whatever...)

And I'd say her being BROKE leaving the white house is a reason to NOT elect her. If you can't make money as the pres or the pres's wife, then you certainly don't know squat about running an economy...

2 ( +3 / -1 )

The United Dysfunctional States of America. Makes me sad that we no longer have any free press and that these so called elections is just Kabuki. The Presidency is becoming some bizarre Dynasty TV show.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

If Jeb Bush runs, he'll win no matter who the Democrats field. I say this as an independent who doesn't watch FOX News. The Republicans have no one else of his stature, experience and common sense. He just needs to find a way to paint over his brother's flawed legacy for the duration of the 2016 campaign.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

'If Jeb Bush runs, he'll win no matter who the Democrats field'

The idea of three Republican presidents in a row from the same oil-drenched family should set alarm bells ringing, as should a geriatric husband and wife team. In a country of over 300 million, there should be other talent on offer.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

I remember when she proudly announced as US Secretary of State, that Assad's days were numbered... 3 years ago.

Every day that he stays in power is another testament to her ineptitude.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

The idea of three Republican presidents in a row from the same oil-drenched family should set alarm bells ringing, as should a geriatric husband and wife team. In a country of over 300 million, there should be other talent on offer.

But it's ok to have another Clinton in the WH, NO...seriously?? Or another Democrat? Obviously, they can't govern properly if Republicans are so called war mongers, then Democrats are economy and homeland destroyers. There has got to be a better way.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

JimizoJun. 16, 2014 - 03:23PM JST

there should be other talent on offer.

hee hee - talent has nothing to do with it. Being president is all to do with how much billion$ govt contracts you can assign to your business associates, how many tax breaks or beneficial laws you can create for your lobbyist buddies, and ultimately play the part that the banking cartels assign.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

But it's ok to have another Clinton in the WH, NO...seriously??

Probably not. She hasn't won yet, or been selected. There's a good chance she won't be. It's likely that a huge number of Americans are vehemently opposed to the idea that the presidency and vice presidency can be passed around between Bushes and Clintons. 1981 to 2008 was a long run, and the idea that the nomination was Hillary Clinton's for the taking - and her right - when she ran last time around could well have contributed to her failure.

Then there's her age: the trend these days is for younger presidents. She'd only be as old as Reagan when he assumed office, but then again, he was a doddering fool, and that might not be what people are looking for.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

I prefer one of the JT poster become the president rather than imperialist, arrogant and crook Junior member of Bush dynasty and incompetent, demented and inconsistent Mrs Clinton. I guess America has no more talent except that two families.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

'a geriatric husband and wife team.'

But it's ok to have another Clinton in the WH, NO...seriously??'

Bass, who do you think I was referring to? Does that sound like I'm advocating Hilary Clinton? Please read mails properly before throwing out a typically half-baked, meaningless rant.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

@jim

On this one, I will have to apologize. I was in a rush reading and hastily hit the send button. Sorry dude, my bad. I do think there are a lot more potential talent out there from either sides than the two families.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites