In era of gridlock, Congress 'creates a monster'


Setting a looming deadline to avert self-created calamity has become a frequent device for the U.S. Congress to get things done in recent years. When all else fails, as it often does, it's supposed to frighten members into action.

That was the idea when Congress created the "fiscal cliff" in August, 2011 to resolve a partisan struggle, also with a deadline and also self-created, over raising the federal debt ceiling.

Catastrophic budget cuts, timed to coincide with the threat of hefty income tax increases, would finally produce big cuts in the soaring federal budget by Dec 31, 2012, or else.

It didn't work.

Congress scared everyone but Congress, which while cutting taxes for most and raising them for a few, made no pretense of trying to make any progress toward reducing the deficit.

"We created a monster," Democratic Representative Charles Rangel of New York said on the floor of the House of Representatives on Tuesday night just before a House vote averted most of the effects of the fiscal cliff.

"This fandango was an immense embarrassment," American Enterprise Institute scholar Norm Ornstein said in an interview with Reuters, calling it "cringeworthy."

And "the fact that we are going to have another disastrous confrontation over the debt limit in two months, with the radical right wing of the House Republicans determined to send us over the edge if they don't get their way, is actually frightening."

"This House could have done worse, by rejecting the plan" to avoid the cliff, he said, "but it has done nothing to challenge its record as at minimum the worst Congress in our lifetimes."

The next confrontation to which Ornstein referred is likely to start heating up in a matter of weeks in anticipation of the need to once again raise the borrowing limit for the government beyond the current level of about $16 trillion. The risk will be a default by the government.

Republicans in Congress, many of whom acknowledged publicly that they took a beating from President Barack Obama in the contest over the cliff, are promising to pursue spending cuts with extra vigor as a condition for approving the debt ceiling increase in the Republican-controlled House.

Historically, each partisan grudge match over spending has tended to make the next one even more bitter.

Alice Rivlin, a former U.S. budget director and Brookings Institution budget expert, also worries about "psychological fallout" from the battle over the cliff that could spill over into the debt ceiling struggle as well as contribute to the global perception that when it comes to the economy, the U.S. can't govern itself.

"It's very bad for the economy," she said in an interview with Reuters, "and for our image in the world. We don't look like a country in charge of its own destiny. That's hard to quantify but it's bad."

"This is a Congress that can barely get its work done - especially when confronting the most important issues of the day," said Sarah Binder, a George Washington University expert on Congress.

"In many ways, public disgust with Congress is already baked in: the public's expectations are so low that it's hard for Congress to surprise us," she said in an interview with Reuters.

That wasn't the way Minority Leader Mitch McConnell - the chief architect of the cliff - expressed it on Aug 1, 2011 as he spoke on the Senate floor.

"It might have appeared to some as though their government wasn't working," he said, "but in fact the opposite was true. The push and pull Americans saw in Washington these past few weeks was not gridlock, it was the will of the people working itself out in a political system that was never meant to be pretty."

Republican Representative David Dreier of California expressed a similar sentiment Monday night as the House closed the loop on the plan McConnell designed.

"This is the greatest deliberative body known to man," he said.

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2013.

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.

Login to comment

Nice deal there buds, for every dollar increase in tax revenue, they've increased spending by forty bucks. That's not the way to bring down the deficit there kids.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

As Marina (of Marina and the Diamonds) says in a song, "I'm obsessed with the mess that's America."

This financial mother of all messes has been building for years and years.

It's not like they couldn't see it coming.

It's almost as if it had been planned that way.


Couldn't be.

Could it?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Yes, 'Berti',

Bankrupt the government while enriching those who own the game. A bankrupt government, can't enforce laws and counter rapacious corporations and other nefarious business operations. Welcome to Third world, USA.

2 ( +2 / -0 )


I've had similar ideas myself.

And voiced them.

And been accused of "conspiracy theories!"

0 ( +0 / -0 )

And been accused of "conspiracy theories!"

It's been the modus operandi of governments since the neolithic revolution.

1) People form cities

2) Government types then con folks into thinking they need "protection"

3) In order to hold their grip on power, they promise things to people

4) In order to fulfill their promises to some people, they have to take from others

5) Since they are government idiots, who've never earned an honest buck, they spend more than they take

6) If they can, since taxes are never enough for spending, they devalue the currency (side note. Roman coins slowly lost their purity over the course of the empire)

7) Pretty soon the jig is up, and everything collapses

I believe most of Western societies are getting dangerously slow to stage 7.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Ours (speaking of the US) is a system that developed out of an agrarian society with a large percentage of slave-based labor. We've done a decent job patching and fixing as we've gone along -- despite over a half-million Americans killed in a Civil War -- but we might be approaching a real systemic breakdown.

Visionary types are needed to articulate the condition as well as alternatives to the current mess. Mitch McConnell and Harry Reid need not apply.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Sadly being from Kentucky as is Mitch - I have to say that he is full of crap

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"Congress... made no pretense of trying to make any progress toward reducing the deficit"

Well, with Obama in the White House, it's pretty hard to do that.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

ah yes - bush era tax cuts,- never could get past the democrats to become permanent. if they did we would not have had a fiscal cliff crisis.

instead we did- and the democrats needed to fight for President Bush's tax cut's - the same ones they railed against in the past.

so did keeping tax cuts while increasing our debt overhead make sense? what is President Obama thinking as he goes year after year with increasing the debt. I mean $5.073 trillion in just four years? so the next 4 years will be quite a ride.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites