Here
and
Now

opinions

Kate's topless snaps won't tarnish royal brand

10 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2012 AFP

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

10 Comments
Login to comment

The brand has been rusted for a very long time!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Won't tarnish the brand. Taking long lens pictures like this is despicable. Don't see why she shouldn't be topless in the privacy of their holiday home. And commenting on her "assets" is pathetic. If you wan to look at breasts, go online and lots are being willingly displayed.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

And that's the problem. This was a terrible invasion of privacy, just so that scum could make money and goons could comment on her body.

Maybe the only way for those people to understand is to make the punishment to be publishing photos of cameramen, the magazine people and their wives.

Trash.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

I think if she is stupid enough to go romping around outside in the nude, then her tits are fair game. Her hubby of all people knows what the paparazzi is capable of, so they shouldn't be surprised.

The most disappointing thing about this is her tits are quite ordinary...

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Who cares about the useless FREE LOADERS...

1 ( +1 / -0 )

What I'm enjoying about this is the outrage from the British tabloids who all run daily page 3 topless girls. So it's just royal titties that are a no-no is it?

SimondB, those page 3 girls seem to be aware that they're being photographed. Your argument holds no water.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

People have really got to realise photos of a woman with not many slothes on are really not that big a deal. I don't know why France and Italy, supposedly open, liberal societies where women sunbathing on the beach "shock horror" topless, is so common, are so excited about publishing these pics. It just really is not that interesting, and if the Royal Family and everyone in the UK would just ignore it like it deserves to be (apart from the question of why the security was so lax) then this whole boring story would go away. And they're not much of a pair anyway..

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

There is nothing to tarnish.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

What I'm enjoying about this is the outrage from the British tabloids who all run daily page 3 topless girls. So it's just royal titties that are a no-no is it?

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites