COVID-19 INFORMATION What you need to know about the coronavirus if you are living in Japan or planning a visit.

Here
and
Now

opinions

On a roll: The psychology behind toilet paper panic

4 Comments
By Issam AHMED
Empty shelves are pictured in the toilet roll/kitchen towel aisle of a supermarket in London on March 13, 2020 Photo: AFP

It's a scene that's become familiar around the world: From the U.S. to France to Australia, rows of empty supermarket shelves where toilet paper used to be, the result of coronavirus-induced panic buying.

What exactly is it about the rolls of tissue that has caused mayhem across cultures, including at times violent clashes that have reverberated on social media?

At its most basic, say experts, the answer lies in game theory: If everyone buys only what they need, there will be no shortages. If some people start panic buying, the optimal strategy will be for you to follow suit, to make certain you have enough squares to spare.

But this doesn't explain it entirely -- toilet paper can't save you from infection, and we haven't yet seen the same level of hoarding for more key items like canned foods -- so something else is clearly afoot.

"I think it probably stuck out in the dramatic images in social media because it was quite clear, the packets are quite distinctive and it's become associated in the minds of people as a symbol of safety," Steven Taylor, author of "The Psychology of Pandemics" told AFP.

"People feel the need to do something to keep themselves and their family safe, because what else can they do apart from wash their hands and self-isolate?" added the psychiatry professor at the University of British Columbia.

Another theory Taylor put forward is rooted in our evolutionary aversion to things which disgust us, heightened when people feel threatened with infection.

"And so I think this is one reason they latched on to the toilet paper, because it's a means of avoiding disgust."

Economists have also suggested people may be trying to eliminate one risk that is relatively easy and superficial, rather than doing something more costly that may reduce their risk a greater amount.

This is known as "Zero risk bias."

"My guess is we want to feel in control and have limited budgets," said Farasat Bokhari, a health economist at the University of East Anglia in Great Britain. "So we go buy something that is cheap to buy, that we can store, and we know at the back of our minds that we are going to use anyway."

A more expensive but necessary item to stock might be non-perishable food -- but if frozen meals, canned foods and ramen aren't exactly your favorites, you could be stuck with a big bill for items you eventually throw away, should the worst fail to materialize.

According to Taylor, many of the behaviors we see now also occurred in previous pandemics, including the Spanish flu in 1918, which killed almost 700,000 Americans and sent panicked citizens to stores and pharmacies to hoard goods.

Some at the time even floated the conspiracy theory the virus may have been a bioweapon devised by Germany. The new coronavirus has been called a Chinese weapon and an American bioweapon, depending on who is making the accusation.

One key difference between the current pandemic and those before it is the ubiquity of social media -- the swine flu pandemic of 2009 happened when the medium was still relatively new -- and Taylor sees both pluses and negatives.

"That's enabled the reverberations of dramatic images and videos throughout the world, inflating people's sense of threat and urgency," said Taylor.

On the other hand, "Social media can be great for social support, particularly if you're in self isolation."

So are we destined for a breakdown in social cohesion if the pandemic stretches out? History says no, said Taylor.

"Rioting and bad behavior in previous pandemics has been relatively uncommon -- it has happened, there have been outbreaks, but the main response has been one of order, of people coming together, of solidarity, helping each other out and doing their best as a community to deal with this."

© 2020 AFP

©2020 GPlusMedia Inc.


4 Comments
Login to comment

I thought toilet paper matter is only in Japan. seems all over the world now. If toilet washlet has a washer and a drier functions, no need of such paper.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Toilet paper was invented in the USA in 1857. It is now sought world over, but is still not universally available. We might reflect on what people used to accomplish the same function before the invention of purpose driven toilet paper. "Leaves, grass, ferns, corn cobs, maize, fruit skins, shells, stone, sand, moss, snow and water."

In other words, a run on toilet paper is more amusing than anything else. Like disposable diapers, there are alternatives, whether those alternatives are as convenient or not. As long as we have soap and running water, all is not lost.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

We still use a smaller quantity of toilet paper because we have the washlet toilet which is cleaner more environmentally friendlier and none or less toilet paper. Some even come with a dryer. The unit can be bought has a seat attachment and some simple plumbing.

Toilet paper was invented in the USA in 1857.

I remember back in the 1950's we had Medicated Paper was sold in packages of flat sheets. Bit rough compared to today's soft tissue.

I guess when it comes to basics, humans are an anal race.

Like disposable diapers, there are alternatives, whether those alternatives are as convenient or not.

Except when you have wear the damn things and need many changes within a single day.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

... and we haven't yet seen the same level of hoarding for more key items like canned foods 

I beg to differ.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites