Here
and
Now

opinions

Pelosi: A long history of provoking China over human rights

11 Comments
By Paul HANDLEY
US Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, arrives in Taiwan in a visit that has angered Beijing and stirred up a new crisis in US-China relations Photo: Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA)/AFP

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has a long history of riling Beijing over democracy and human rights, whether by unveiling a banner on Tiananmen Square or in regular meetings with Tibet's exiled spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama.

Pelosi, the country's most powerful lawmaker, stoked fresh tensions in US-China relations Tuesday when she flew into Taiwan, the highest-ranked elected US official to visit the island in 25 years.

But it was only the most recent act to nettle China by the powerful 82-year-old lawmaker, who is second in line to the US presidency. Pelosi has taken every opportunity over a long career to goad Beijing for what she calls a dismal record on human rights and democracy.

As a junior congresswoman, just two years into her career, she was highly vocal about the June 4, 1989, Tiananmen crackdown on pro-Democracy demonstrators in Beijing.

She called it a shocking "massacre" and accused Chinese security services of conducting "secret executions."

"The human rights of the people in China are not an internal matter. They are of concern to people all over the world," she declared.

Since then, Pelosi has regularly needled Beijing's leadership -- frequently meeting political and religious dissidents, as well as the Dalai Lama, and labelling the treatment of Muslim minorities in the Xinjiang region "genocide."

Two years after the Tiananmen crackdown, she visited China with two other members of Congress on an official invitation.

She irked her hosts by visiting the famed square, placing flowers at a martyrs memorial with a banner that read: "To those who died for democracy in China."

After Chinese police briefly detained the American legislators, she told reporters: "We've been told for two days now that there is freedom of speech in China. This does not conform to what we were told."

Her actions are good politics -- she represents San Francisco, home to a large Chinese population, which in the 1980s was dominated by people who had fled communist China, or had roots in the much freer Taiwan and Hong Kong.

But after 35 years, Pelosi has proven herself a consistent defender of human rights in China, and shows little regard for how her actions impact diplomatic ties between Washington and Beijing.

She has regularly opposed China's hosting of the Olympics, and has sought tough trade treatment of the country due to its rights record.

In 2010, she traveled to Oslo for the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to imprisoned Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo.

Every year in Congress she makes note of the Tiananmen incident, highlighting the violence waged on the Chinese people by the People's Liberation Army, and the lengthy imprisonment of dissidents.

"We want them to know that in the Congress of the United States, we know about them, we care about them," she said in 2009, the 20th anniversary.

One of the first foreign trips she took after rising to the House speaker position was leading a Congressional delegation to Dharamsala, India to meet the Dalai Lama, whom she had received in Washington a year earlier.

The devout, progressive Catholic said she was there to shine "the bright light on the truth of what is happening in Tibet," where Beijing is accused of severely repressing local culture.

"If freedom-loving people throughout the world do not speak out against China's oppression in China and Tibet, we have lost all moral authority to speak on behalf of human rights anywhere in the world," she said.

President Joe Biden, normally a close ally of Pelosi, reportedly hoped in recent weeks to deter her trip to Taiwan, to avoid stirring China's anger while the US is deeply embroiled in the Russia-Ukraine war.

But Pelosi stuck to her guns. She wrote in the Washington Post that since her first visit to Tiananmen Square, "Beijing's abysmal human rights record and disregard for the rule of law continue, as President Xi Jinping tightens his grip on power."

She pointed to the harsh political crackdown in Hong Kong, "genocide" in Xinjiang and continued repression in Tibet.

"We take this trip at a time when the world faces a choice between autocracy and democracy," she said.

"As Russia wages its premeditated, illegal war against Ukraine, killing thousands of innocents -- even children -- it is essential that America and our allies make clear that we never give in to autocrats."

© 2022 AFP

©2022 GPlusMedia Inc.


11 Comments
Login to comment

Pelosi is third in line for the presidency not second. That would be VP Harris.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

It is not a good thing when standing up for basic human rights as seen as a provocation.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Of all of the countries who might preach Human Rights to others, the United States is very far down the list. U.S. history is composed of one Human Rights atrocity after another whether domestic or offshore and the arrogant hypocrisy of a person like Pelosi who, for every charge she levels against China, abundant American examples throughout U.S. history can be found if one chooses to acknowledge them. This kind of political grandstanding is actually disgusting and she claims to feel so strongly about FREEDOM yet she opposes the peoples of Donetsk and Luhansk who are seeking FREEDOM from a generally acknowledged corrupt Kyiv government. Such contradiction reveals the hollowness of this senescent professional politician and egocentric troublemaker who doesn't care about the many young lives her actions may put in danger. Time for her to retire and tend a garden rather than making things even more difficult for a not very well thought out American foreign policy and a struggling President. Go home, Nancy!

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

Pelosi may have provoked China over human rights, but she also used China to make a lot of money, read "Red-Handed: How American Elites Get Rich Helping China Win"

4 ( +6 / -2 )

There was a time when Standing up for Human Rights used to be a Republican as well as a Democratic thing. Then came Don and his insatiable need to grift and have his ego stroked through his tissue tissue-thin skin.

So now Human Rights are just a Democratic thing.

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

Pelosi is third in line for the presidency not second. That would be VP Harris.

The article was correct. Pelosi is second in line. Harris is first in line. The sitting president is not in line.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

There was a time when Standing up for Human Rights used to be a Republican as well as a Democratic thing. 

And it still is, the big difference is Republicans always believe in peace through strength and not by appeasement or capitulation, that’s the biggest difference between them and the Democrats.

> Then came Don and his insatiable need to grift and have his ego stroked through his tissue tissue-thin skin. 

And Pelosi’s excuse is.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Republicans always believe in peace through strength and not by appeasement or capitulation, that’s the biggest difference between them and the Democrats.

Most of the Republicans on here seem to be quite keen on appeasing and capitulating to Putin.

Its almost as if they had 5 years of someone they adore telling them that he was a trustworthy, honest man and they can’t seem to admit to themselves that he might not be.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Most of the Republicans on here seem to be quite keen on appeasing and capitulating to Putin. 

This administration already did.

Its almost as if they had 5 years of someone they adore telling them that he was a trustworthy,

No, but Putin confronted him for killing a bunch of his troops in Syria and he said he’ll continue to kill more troops if anything happens to our troops in that country that definitely got Vlad’s attention.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

This administration already did.

How so? Biden has supplied billions in equipment and expertise.

What has he not done that the Republicans would have?

What would Donald have done?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

bass4funk

And it still is, the big difference is Republicans always believe in peace through strength and not by appeasement or capitulation, that’s the biggest difference between them and the Democrats.

Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites