South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol's brief imposition of martial law marks a new warning for the worldwide fragility of democracy, even in a country hailed as a model of political transformation.
Yoon's attempt on Tuesday night to shut down political activity, censor media and lock out opposition lawmakers stunned South Korea's longtime ally, the United States, which said it had no advance warning and issued a statement of concern.
South Korea's transition to elected rule since a mass uprising in 1987 had been seen as so thorough that the United States increasingly spoke of its ally as a global partner. Meanwhile, Seoul billed itself as a new, ideal hub for international media as China clamped down on Hong Kong.
President Joe Biden had even chosen Yoon as the host in March of his final Summit for Democracy -- a signature initiative of the outgoing U.S. leader, who sought to champion liberal values globally, in an unstated repudiation of Donald Trump, who returns to the White House next month.
But observers, while stunned by Yoon, said there were warning signs.
Danny Russel, a top U.S. diplomat for Asia under former President Barack Obama and who earlier served in South Korea, pointed to the deadlock in parliament where the opposition repeatedly sought impeachments against Yoon's administration.
Yoon's move "was a complete surprise to me (but) yes, there were very obvious structural forces at work," he said.
"There is a radically polarized political scene in Korea. The opposition has been pursuing scorched-earth political obstruction tactics," he said.
But he pointed to the quick, large-scale protests that erupted after Yoon's declaration as a sign of a vibrant civil society ready to defend democracy.
"One certainly would hope that this would serve as a wake-up call to both the ruling conservative party and the progressive opposition that both sides have gone too far and that there needs to be some process of reconciliation, of dealing with legitimate differences and grievances."
Yoon himself had earlier shown signs of authoritarianism.
In a national address last year, Yoon raged against supposed communists who have "disguised themselves as democracy activists, human rights advocates or progressive activists."
A prosecutor, Yoon narrowly won the 2022 election on a platform of economic reform and advocated close ties with the United States as well as historic rival Japan. But his popularity swiftly slid and the opposition won the National Assembly.
Celeste Arrington, a Korea expert at George Washington University, noted that Yoon had never held elected office before and had become increasingly frustrated.
"This is really an extreme move that may signal, I think, the president's lack of political experience," she said.
She said that martial law showed "some cracks in democracy" but that the quick reversal "gives me hope in the health and strength and vibrancy of democracy in South Korea."
Bruce Klingner, a senior research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, expected Yoon's career to be over after attempting martial law, which constitutionally can only be imposed for wars or other emergencies.
"Yoon's action is a damning reversal to decades of South Korean efforts to put its authoritarian past behind it," he said.
The number of democracies worldwide soared starting in the late 1980s as the Soviet Union collapsed and student-led uprisings brought reforms elsewhere.
But globally, democracy has been in retreat for the last 18 straight years, according to the Washington-based group Freedom House, which promotes political liberty.
Democratically elected leaders have taken increasingly authoritarian steps in countries as diverse as India, Turkey and Hungary.
V-Dem, another closely watched democracy index, had most recently ranked South Korea third in Asia after Taiwan and Japan.
In the United States, Trump has rejected long-held norms, refusing to accept he lost to Biden four years ago -- culminating in his supporters violently rampaging through the U.S. Capitol.
Trump's rejection of democracy ultimately worked out for him: campaigning on the rage of 2020, he won last month's election.
But experts said Yoon's power play -- and its reversal -- could in fact show a victory for democratic values.
"Yoon is a deeply unpopular and ineffectual leader, but there was nothing I saw of people being dissatisfied with the way government runs," Alan Yu, a senior vice president at the left-leaning Center for American Progress, said after a recent trip to Seoul.
Darcie Draudt-Vejares of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said that with the swift response to Yoon, "this crisis may ultimately strengthen Korean democracy by reaffirming civilian control and demonstrating institutional resilience."
© 2024 AFP
3 Comments
Login to comment
TaiwanIsNotChina
It shows that new democracies sometimes have better laws to secure them from barbarism than old ones.
Aoi Azuuri
Citizen who gathered to parliament urgently, Staff or lawmakers who protected parliament, Soldiers who dispatched but actually had no intention to shoot citizen or control parliament. South Korea where each people defended democracy by each way at each place.
On the other hand, in present Japan where somehow Japanese far-rights have even denounced Korean citizen who tried to defend parliament and twisted far-right politicians are insisting necessity of Japan version "martial law" despite revealed risk of abuse of power, despair that "If same situation caused in Japan, the Diet will be easily occupied by force, citizen will be shooted, democracy will be stopped soon" spreading among citizen.
socrateos
Aoi Azuuri:
democracy has been relatively mature for many years, and no martial law has been declared under the current Constitution. In modern Japan, simple voting, not violence, is the tool for political change.
Meanwhile stories are differenct in Korea in the same period.
1. After WWII and Korean War (1945–1953)
After WWII, Korea faced division and instability. The Korean War (1950–1953) saw the frequent imposition of martial law in South Korea to manage wartime conditions and suppress suspected communist activity.
2. Rhee Syngman Era (1948–1960)
Under President Rhee Syngman, martial law was declared to suppress opposition and maintain control. Notably, martial law was imposed during the April Revolution (1960) when protests led to Rhee's resignation.
3. Park Chung-hee Era (1961–1979)
General Park Chung-hee came to power through a military coup in 1961, under martial law. Martial law was used to consolidate power and suppress dissent during his authoritarian rule, particularly when opposition to his regime grew.
4. Chun Doo-hwan Era and Gwangju Uprising (1979–1987)
After President Park's assassination in 1979, Chun Doo-hwan seized power, declaring nationwide martial law in 1980. The Gwangju Uprising (May 1980) was a key event during this period. Citizens in Gwangju protested against martial law and authoritarian rule, but the military responded with brutal force, leading to hundreds of deaths.
5. Transition to Democracy (1987 Onwards)
The last significant use of martial law was in 1980 under Chun Doo-hwan.