Take our user survey and make your voice heard.

Here
and
Now

opinions

The CEO got a huge raise. You didn't. Here's why.

10 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

10 Comments
Login to comment

1 blame the robots.

Nah, blame yourselves.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

'Blame the Robots' is correct, I work in IT and when the Economy is bad we get busy adding more than the usual level of automation to replace human workers.

Some projects I worked on caused a big numbers of employees to be 'let go' as their work became automated.

8 ( +8 / -0 )

One BIG reason these CEOs are raking it in that the article didn't mention is the FEDs unnaturally low interest rates.

How is this connected?

It works like this:

1) Companies borrow money at close to zero interest.

2) They buy back a lot of their shares with that money.

3) This DECREASES the amount of shares publicly available

4) This INCREASES the EPS (Earnings Per Share) Since there are less shares with the same earnings

5) This boosts the stock price

6) CEO says "Look at me, I'm doing such a good job that the stock keeps going up! Give me a raise"

7) Clueless, yet happy shareholders say, "OK!"

8) Rinse repeat, every quarter, every year, etc.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Eliminating taxes would just create an anarchy. Just make taxation fair.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

This really only applies to America, CEO's in Japan are not paid that much more than another else, and are more like cheer leaders (quote from JapanToday).

2 ( +2 / -0 )

@gogogo - My sentiments exactly!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

@gaijinfo couldn't have said it better myself... and on top of it all, of course, lets not forget there's 5 main ways a CEO rakes it in: Signing Bonuses, Base Salary, Seasonal/Performance Bonuses, Equity, and the big one Severance/Buyout/Retirement packages, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_compensation_in_the_United_States#Severance.2Fbuyout.2Fretirement_compensation

1 ( +1 / -0 )

pointofview I am with you on that, sick of low pay then upskill, retrain, get smarter, come up with some innovation, why should the burger flipper be paid as much as the guy who trained to be an engineer?

I feel that the amount of income is in relation to your smarts and skill level.

But just because you went to university doesn't mean automatically you'll be paid well, I know some real dumb mutts with degrees, just is they knew how to remember stuff they had read when the exams came along. That does not equal smarts.

Most of the real smart people never went to university.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Jonobugs, yes. I like the idea France had of taxing the companies paying more than $1 million to executives, effectively not taxing the individuals (though their max rate is 75%, which is very detrimental to the country's economy), but not letting 100% of salary above that amount be a 100% expense to the corporation. This seems like a good idea to me. Pay what you want, but above $1 million or whatever, there will be a payroll surcharge (or whatever you want to call it) to the corporation in addition to what the individual actually receiving the money pays. Make sure this applies to the value of stock as well as actual money.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

The solution to the wage problem is to eliminate all taxation, since taxes eat up to 92% of an American's livelihood. Instead of living hand to mouth on $100K a year, live well on $8K a year and don't pay any taxes.

-4 ( +3 / -7 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites