Here
and
Now

opinions

Trump's brand of populism: Is he the next Andrew Jackson? Or the next Groucho Marx?

16 Comments

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, is being hailed as a "populist."

But Trump is no ordinary political populist -- one of those folks who rail against economic inequality. He has managed to do something no other populist has: Trump grafted the populism of popular culture (where it has been extremely popular) onto politics (where it has not).

That might just be the secret to his success.

American popular culture emerged at the time of President Andrew Jackson. The public jammed a thumb in the eye of elitist culture -- and that thumb has been there ever since. Populism arose in the cultural, rather than the political, arena in part because democratic yearnings were much harder to exercise in politics, where despite all the American professions of egalitarianism, the moneyed class still held sway. Ordinary Americans took their power where they could.

The high-brow explanation for much of popular culture -- from the success of trashy novels in the 1830s to the high ratings of trashy TV programs in the 2010s -- is that most people aren't very smart or sophisticated. Essentially, the public likes garbage because it doesn't know any better.

Another less condescending explanation is that the public favors these sorts of down-market entertainments specifically because elitists disfavor them. Like the teenager who cranks up his rap music because he knows his parents disapprove.

In a way, that is one engine for all of American popular culture. The more the elitists disapproved, the more the hoi polloi embraced their reputed trash. Popular culture was always outlaw culture.

This wasn't only a matter of style. It was substance. So much of American popular culture is about populism -- about blowing up or at the very least needling elitist culture. It is always the outsider against the powers-that-be -- whether it is Charlie Chaplin or Madonna or Tupac or Bill Murray or NWA or Melissa McCarthy. That is the key to its appeal.

Popular culture gives the public the vicarious charge of tearing down the people trying to lord it over them. If you need a paradigm, just think of the Marx Brothers creating chaos in "A Night at the Opera."

Trump, like Groucho, is a disruptive force. Groucho took on the pompous, the elitist, the self-satisfied and the oblivious (poor Margaret Dumont). He created chaos where his social betters held sway.

American politics is something else again. Of course, there have been populists who claim to be tribunes for the wider public. Most notable, perhaps, William Jennings Bryan, the three-time Democratic presidential nominee (in 1896, 1900 and 1908). And, not incidentally, a three-time loser.

Indeed, aside from Jackson, to whom Trump is often compared, America has never had a populist president. Populists just don't get presidential traction.

The failure of national populism is partly because the elites served as gatekeepers of the U.S. political process, something Trump has now circumvented. But it is also the result of something deeper in the American psyche.

U.S. politics have been less about class warfare than class aspiration. Republicans and Democrats alike offer the promise of fluid social mobility. People don't envy the rich and powerful as much as hope to become rich and powerful. The American Dream is all about emulation: Anyone can make it if they work hard like all these rich people reputedly did.

Success through hard work is bipartisan, bedrock Americanism. But Republicans have been especially adept at pushing the idea of emulation. That is why populism seldom wins. Because emulation cancels it out. They are mutually exclusive models of how to succeed.

Trump, as a self-proclaimed billionaire, certainly hasn't abandoned the politics of emulation. It is alive and well in his campaign. He even makes a point of pushing it aggressively: his buildings, his golf courses, his private plane, his super-model wife. These are the spoils of American winners.

For Trump, though, these things are certification of his credibility -- not sources of his appeal. When supporters talk about why they love Trump, it's not because he is a billionaire. They say it's because he says what he thinks, without calculation or politesse.

Trump is essentially a bomb thrower in a country that has a deep and abiding affection for bomb throwers. As long as those bombs are tossed at elites -- and as long as they are tossed in popular culture, in novels or movies or TV shows. It is that vicarious disruption most Americans hanker for, not actual destruction. We are conservative that way.

But the real reason that the politics of emulation isn't working the way it once did (and one reason the GOP establishment failed this year) is that Americans have increasingly lost faith in the premise. Social mobility is immobile. Wages have stagnated for decades. Now, surveys show that the holy American Dream is losing its hold. The public is beginning to feel that the only way it can have a fortune is if they win Powerball.

Trump seems to have understood this. He arose not from politics but from popular culture -- the richest soil of populism. He made his reputation on TV as a potentate, both by bragging on talk shows that no one could possibly outwit him or overpower him (he was the master of "The Art of the Deal"), and by telling opportunists that they were fired.

Trump was always the 800-pound gorilla. But, and here is the important thing, he did it with a plebeian, nihilistic touch. The very touch that so many of his critics bemoan.

There are no niceties with Trump. Populists in popular culture are like that. They don't see themselves as appeasing. They don't even see themselves as winning, though Trump makes a big show of that. They see themselves as destroying the establishment.

In some ways, Trump is the Michael Bay candidate. Like Bay, the movie director who specializes in mass destruction with his "Transformer" series, Trump clearly likes to blow things up. He has certainly blown up the Republican Party, and maybe U.S. political discourse along with it.

With his combination of strongman bluster and impolitic common-man appeal, he is an authoritarian populist, an oxymoron if ever there was one. But he may have the greater distinction of being another oxymoron: an elitist nihilist.

In the end, Trump probably won't turn out to be another Jackson. Less a politician than a character out of a movie, he is more likely to turn out to be a brow-furrowed, nasty Groucho Marx -- with the American establishment standing in for the opera.

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2016.

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.

16 Comments
Login to comment

Trump is a bumbling idiot.

Ignore him and he'll go away.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

Not sure which would be worse, given Jackson's poor record.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Trump is a bumbling idiot.

Ignore him and he'll go away.

I was wishing the same thing about our current president 7 years ago, but I had to endure it, now liberals can sit in the backseat and deal with it. Go Trump!

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

I was wishing the same thing about our current president 7 years ago,

In other words, bass4funk, you had already made up your mind about him at the time of his inauguration, and nothing he would do are say after that would make the least bit of difference. At least Julius "Groucho" Marx had the common sense to stay out of politics, since he knew it would just bring out the anti-semites.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

In other words, bass4funk, you had already made up your mind about him at the time of his inauguration, and nothing he would do are say after that would make the least bit of difference. At least Julius "Groucho" Marx had the common sense to stay out of politics, since he knew it would just bring out the anti-semites

Pretty much, because I had heard Obama on a number of interviews laying out his ideology on how he wants to reshape and change America fundamentally and was vehemently opposed to that, but the people spoke, I had to deal and live with it, just a few more months to go and if Trump wins, you guys can do the same.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

bass4funkMAY. 13, 2016 - 11:08AM JST I was wishing the same thing about our current president 7 years ago, but I had to endure it, now liberals can sit in the backseat and deal with it. Go Trump!

Yeah, sorry, that's not how it works. You don't get to foist some terrible President on the rest of us just because you didn't get your way the last time. We're a democracy, not a turn-taking service. However flawed our system may be, someone who wants to win the Presidency still has to you know, earn it.

And Trump's not doing that. Sympathetic voices can gloss over his racism and misogyny and religious discrimination all they want, but the rest of America isn't falling for it. When you start getting compared to Andrew Jackson, you know you're in deep trouble.

5 ( +6 / -1 )

How can anyone seriously support this clown who appeals to the pitchfork and torches crowd... if he was around in the 17th century he's be burning witches, black people, Native Americans and women... who he'd accuse of being witches when they have a period. The guy is a buffoon... and a dangerous one at that.

Comparing him to Groucho Marx? Really?

4 ( +5 / -1 )

It would seem odd to compare him to either.

Donald Trump is a troubled individual. He may very well become the first man to ruin the US presidency in its entirety.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

I mentioned before on this forum that I am well off and have everything I want, within reason. I don’t need anything. Still, Mr. Trump appeals to me on some powerful, unconscious, archetypal level. That’s the dynamic critics and the Democratic Party can’t deal with, because they can’t see it, and it will very possibly catapult him into the White House; because the appeal could be on a collective unconscious level largely irrespective of all the points of wrangle pro and con.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Yeah, sorry, that's not how it works. You don't get to foist some terrible President on the rest of us just because you didn't get your way the last time.

Wait a minute. Who says the people can't? So you are basically saying, because you and other libs don't like what a large majority of the people want, we should circumvent the process and get someone in there and defy the people and damn their votes, just as long as we don't get Trump? If he becomes president fair and square, it's a sign and a clear repudiation of Obama and his disastrous policies and the people have spoken that they want to go in a different direction.

We're a democracy, not a turn-taking service. However flawed our system may be, someone who wants to win the Presidency still has to you know, earn it.

Which he has fair and square. Look at what Washington had. They had 17 hard heavyweights and Trump destroyed them all, established and professional career politicians, the man came in with a wrecking ball and no matter how much the establishment put in, NONE of them could beat him. If he can beat these guys, there is NO way that liberals can say, he CANNOT beat Hillary, he actually could and if he did, again, it would be a fair and square fight.

And Trump's not doing that. Sympathetic voices can gloss over his racism and misogyny and religious discrimination all they want, but the rest of America isn't falling for it. When you start getting compared to Andrew Jackson, you know you're in deep trouble.

Sorry, but Trump is doing exactly that. I can dig up some of Obama's rhetoric that he spewed in 2008 about how he pushed his followers to get in his opponents faces. America started to fall about in the last year of Bush and continued to fall since then and with over 46 million people on food stamps and open border and wanting to grant illegals amnesty, its No wonder why so many people are flocking to Trump. The only thing is, what will Dems try to do next, the race card and the gender card isn't working this time and lost its luster.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

And, speaking of intuition, rather than rhetoric, I don’t think a lot of people buy into the racist and misogyny accusations; again, because I don’t see or feel them from him. I’m quite sure he would deny access to white Americans who switched citizenship and moved to Mexico and tried to come back illegally. And even if a man objectifies women somewhat, and jokes about their menstrual cycles, it doesn’t make him a misogynist (a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women). Mr. Trump employs women executives and is respected by his beautiful wife and daughters. And I would be willing to bet a lot of money he would love to hug Huma Mahmood Abedin as much as I would, not minding at all that she is both a Muslim and a woman.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

Trump as Groucho Marx?

That is an insult to true Marxists the world over. Trump is precisely the type of pompous blowhard the Marx Brothers took aim at.

Hail Freedonia!

4 ( +4 / -0 )

bass4funkMAY. 13, 2016 - 10:50PM JST Wait a minute. Who says the people can't? So you are basically saying, because you and other libs don't like what a large majority of the people want, we should circumvent the process and get someone in there and defy the people and damn their votes, just as long as we don't get Trump?

Why do you even bother to respond if you're just going to make up what you respond to?

Which he has fair and square.

What's his standing in national polls again? Not to beat out other terrible Republicans, but to actually be President?

America started to fall about in the last year of Bush and continued to fall since then and with over 46 million people on food stamps and open border and wanting to grant illegals amnesty,

A shall we say, imaginative interpretation of the current state of affairs in the US.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

MAKE FREEDONIA GREAT AGAIN

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"How can anyone seriously support this clown who appeals to the pitchfork and torches crowd"

He also appeals to the anti-establishment, tired of politically correct crowd, hence his virtual tie in polls with Hillary Clinton.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

"With his combination of strongman bluster and impolitic common-man appeal, he is an authoritarian populist, an oxymoron if ever there was one. But he may have the greater distinction of being another oxymoron: an elitist nihilist." - article

The claim Trump is a "strongman" isn't accurate.

Trump uses thugs and goons to beat people. That's not a strong man, that's a coward.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites