Take our user survey and make your voice heard.

Here
and
Now

opinions

We need to look at impact of new technology on our brains

9 Comments

It is not unusual, these days, for children to spend five hours a day looking at computer screens or mobile phones. That’s five hours a day that they’re not exploring their neighborhoods, feeling the wind in their hair, or giving someone a hug. Yet it seems we are sleepwalking into this new cyberculture without even questioning its impact on our brains.

The human brain is exquisitely talented at adapting to its environment. Its plasticity has allowed humans to occupy more ecological niches than any other species on the planet. But this adaptability also means that as our environments change in unprecedented ways, so, too, do our brains.

In our eagerness to embrace technology, we have created environments that are almost certainly impacting our brains, and, more pressingly, the brains of a younger generation that has never known anything else.

Look no further than the fact that we are constantly connected through Facebook and Twitter. We are developing the attention spans of gnats, many have given up privacy in return for “celebrity”, and we take it as a given that it is desirable to be connected all the time. Is it really desirable? I’m not convinced.

We now live in a strange, narcissistic world where even the most banal aspects of our lives are fodder for digital output. We constantly seek the validation of others through our tweets and status updates. Adults might be equipped for these changes, but how is this impacting the development of children, who are increasingly living their lives and forming their identities through the eyes of virtual others?

I find it scary that children can’t reflect on whether they feel excited, happy, let down, disappointed, or frustrated without also considering whether something is “Facebook-worthy.”

Young people are also missing out on the opportunity to rehearse basic skills like eye contact, body language, and voice-turn recognition – the kind of things one gets from practicing face-to-face communication. Consequently, the development of complex emotions like empathy is now at risk. Perhaps this is why we get the kind of ruthless bullying that now occurs on Facebook pages, or the spiteful remarks that we find in comments sections online. Might the next generation not experience the kind of accountability that comes naturally through face-to-face interaction?

In her recent book, "Alone Together," MIT psychologist Sherry Turkle argues, paradoxically, that the more connected people become online, the less comfortable they tend to feel with themselves. The disconnect between the selves that we portray on Facebook and our real selves is likely familiar to many readers.

All of this is to say nothing of the impact that things like gaming are having on risk-taking, violence, and addiction, how our reliance on search engines is affecting our capacity for deeper-order cognition, or even how interaction with a two-dimensional screen is destroying our ability to focus.

Critics will point out that we don’t yet have the definitive scientific proof needed to make causal claims about these things. But the initial trends and correlations already surfacing in the scientific literature, and in our communities, are evidence enough to at least encourage us to stop being so complacent.

Consider the 1950s, when the increased incidence of lung cancer correlated strongly with cigarette consumption, but there was still no conclusive evidence, so nothing was done. It seems foolish, now, that we failed to take precautions then.

Modern technology’s impact on our brains poses a complex, multifaceted, and significant risk to humanity. I have coined the term “mind change” to emphasize the dangers that we face in this regard. My hope is that echoing the phrase “climate change” might encourage people to take the issue more seriously.

Unlike climate change, there is more we can do about mind change than simply damage limitation. Governments can begin to invest in the kind of longitudinal studies and other important scientific research that we need to better understand how our brains are changing. We can also push social-networking sites, video-game designers, and other industries to create more sophisticated digital experiences – virtual worlds that provide meaning and depth.

I’m certainly not suggesting that we should turn back the clock or put hatchets in computers. I don’t question the fantastic benefits the cyberworld has brought to our societies. But it would be ironic if the technologies that have enabled such incredible progress deprived us of the ability to maximize our individual potential.

© Japan Today

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

9 Comments
Login to comment

This can also apply to TV when it first came out, or PCs when they first came out, etc. etc. Technology is always improving, and there's always going to be people who claim it's somehow bad for society. If you think it's bad for you, don't do it. But don't expect some society wide soul searching because you aren't comfortable with something.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Sadly I think the digital world is achieving a much darker side effect than we may be willing to recognize. Today individuals in our society are more isolated and physically alone than in much of our history. We no longer have the patience or attention spans to share complex ideas, belief systems and opinions. Instead we are often obsessed with the trivial and limited to Twitter length attention to thought.

From a political point of view this is most likely the most power form of “social passification” ever devised. A distracted, attention limited and trivia focused society poses no threat to those who would dictate policies or exploit society. That is a considerable danger.

Sure we think we are effective politically online, but are we really? The web enables us to become even more polarized and ineffective. It keeps us expressing our views online rather than in practical ways in the real world. We feel we have changed things by speaking out online (this post is another example), but do we follow up with real world action? In most cases no, we don’t.

If I were a dictator looking to rule a population I would not stop the web, I would assure that every single person had full and easy access to it. Because they will be sharing photos of yesterday’s desert or some silly photo while I carry on, perhaps complained about, but not really challenged in the real world, to do whatever I want to rule.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

That’s five hours a day that they’re not exploring their neighborhoods, feeling the wind in their hair, or giving someone a hug.

Don't worry, they'll get bored pretty soon and finally they'll also want to go out and do all these things themselves.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

That’s five hours a day that they’re not exploring their neighborhoods, feeling the wind in their hair, or giving someone a hug.

Don't worry. As soon as they graduate, they'll spend eight to nine hours at the computer; nine hours a day that they're not feeling anything, let alone the wind in their hair.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

A very complex issue indeed. Does being "connected" actually disconnect us? I think so. In the U.S. over the last few years before I left I do not recall seeing many children or families out in the parks playing and interacting the way I do in my new "home" country, that could be because the standard of living is lower here and technology hasn't yet arrived full scale. The article mentions that we do not know what technology is doing to the human brain. This is again my observation, in the U.S. they say that about 1% of children as now Autistic, here where I am there is decent medical care and education and the autism rate is less than 0.1% here, possible cause? My education degree is not in medicine so I am just making an engineers observation.

Don't worry, they'll get bored pretty soon and finally they'll also want to go out and do all these things themselves

Sorry but not in the U.S. the kids just go deeper into their rooms and open more chat-rooms on their computers.

Good article with good questions.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

One of the best articles I've seen in ages.

Bravo Susan and thanks for your insight.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

New technology is definitely hard on my poor brain. Sometimes I wish I could just go back to VHS recorders and cassette tape recorders, they were so simple to use, lol.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Excellent perspective. The human need to mull, to consider information in an extended manner...to contemplate....poof...that necessary phase of learning to accrue knowledge does not 'flow' within technologies wires.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Why do you think ADD and ADHD is on the rise? Kids should be reading more and playing outside more and not in front of the TV/Computer 5 hours a day.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites