Take our user survey and make your voice heard.

Voices
in
Japan

have your say

How effective a fighting force do you think Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) are?

15 Comments

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

15 Comments
Login to comment

I sincerely hope that we never have to find out.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

The only honest answer to this question is that it really doesn't matter one way or the other. Despite what some people would have you believe, no rational country will ever set out to invade and conquer Japan.

There are no natural resources here, no tangible wealth to plunder. Any invading army would only be saddled with hungry and elderly mouths to feed and an ecomony that would collapse overnight.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

That depends on where and who they are fighting.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

M3M3M3: There are no natural resources here, no tangible wealth to plunder. Any invading army would only be saddled with hungry and elderly mouths to feed and an ecomony that would collapse overnight.

This assumes candidates for 'invading armies' that care about any of that.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

There are no natural resources here, no tangible wealth to plunder.

You are forgetting that Japan is next door to a country with millions of men who have no chance of getting married.

0 ( +4 / -3 )

As long as they do not keep staying tsukareta, then perhaps they would do well. I find the young men to be very wimpy here, but boost some of that nationalist emperor spirit, and they could do well.

Besides, the Americans would be fighting next to them.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

How effective a fighting force do you think Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) are?

Leadership plays a key factor here too. General Nakatani and his goons, in leadership positions, haven't really been tested.

Plus the SDF rules of engagement are a joke.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

General Nakatani and his goons, in leadership positions, haven't really been tested.

As a military person living in this country, how is it that you can continue to make inflammatory bigoted comments, insult your hosts and get away with it? Does JT give special privileges for military personnel?

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Lol

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I don't know. I don't know enough about them to even guess.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

I seriously doubt their effectiveness when it comes to fighting. Its never been put to test actually.

If you remove the word "Fighting" then I would bet any amount on these forces for sure. Japan has one of the best force when it comes to relief measures and aid.

Some day the destructive Islamic radicalists will test them. They are doing in many other parts of the world.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

How effective a fighting force do you think Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) are?

Before asking this, how about looking at the morale of Japanese men as whole and how they feel about their country?

Only like 11% are willing to fight for Japan. Its a "landslide" of a percentage to favor enemy combatants.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Well, considering that the main purpose of the SDF is to defend against an invading force, they have it set up pretty well with the way they have divided their territory. Their training is excellent and they seem to do a good job of recruiting bright individuals for their National Military College (Boeidai) and lifers at lower ranks. The problem might be with the easiest recruitment level and its two-year contract since many do not continue after receiving their bonus and are probably prone to a lack of enthusiasm during training.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

The Self Defense Forces have an obligation in a limited agreement with the government of Japan, however when the international activities of the Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs shall engage in foreign relations by political machinery that prays for expert opinion the National Military College has the responsible role to train, and establish a knowledge base for international foreign affairs diplomacy as competent. As exemplified when human factor as human intelligence is involved by an International Organization, 22 U.S.C. 288 defined, e.g. Interpol, business arrangement terms and conditions as reasons for factor analysis by cost. See also, Hollnagel, E. (1983). Human error. (Position Paper for NATO Conference on Human Error, August 1983, Bellagio,Italy); NATO. Alternative Form Analysis Handbook. 2nd Ed. NATO. 2017 PDF ; (factor analysis by cost) Stanton, N.A. (2006). Hierarchical task analysis developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics. 37 (1) 55–79. Therefor, the efficiency of how well the Japanese model, or matrix, is accepted given the values for criteria acceptance in regional consultative is involved by fact, rule of law, and un-bias analysis to enforce Casus foederis. (See, Casus foederis. Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casus_foederis)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites