Yeah, because they didn't test enough, and were not able to identify who had the virus. With the number of cases that were in Tokyo, Kanagawa etc. you can't tell me one of these people didn't travel to Morioka and infect people. But if you don't test, then you can still claim to have zero cases!
agree with the previous post... key words there being “ no confirmed cases “... not confirmed... doesn,t mean there aren,t / weren,t any cases... testing / not testing makes a big difference...
Japan has had a very low number of cases in total so there are a number of prefectures who were barely touched. It's the big cities that we were rightly worried about.
10 Comments
Login to comment
MarkX
Yeah, because they didn't test enough, and were not able to identify who had the virus. With the number of cases that were in Tokyo, Kanagawa etc. you can't tell me one of these people didn't travel to Morioka and infect people. But if you don't test, then you can still claim to have zero cases!
rcch
agree with the previous post... key words there being “ no confirmed cases “... not confirmed... doesn,t mean there aren,t / weren,t any cases... testing / not testing makes a big difference...
Neil McCauley
Because they haven't done any/sufficient testing there.
borscht
According to Aso, it’s their culture.
commanteer
Wanko soba no doubt.
tamanegi
Not enough testing
YeahRight
Those of us who live in Iwate care.
Akula
Japan has had a very low number of cases in total so there are a number of prefectures who were barely touched. It's the big cities that we were rightly worried about.