The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOShikoku Electric restarts nuclear reactor
MATSUYAMA©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
13 Comments
Login to comment
happyhere
Scrap it and move on.
cla68
Fire that thing up and give us our carbon-free juice!
Goodlucktoyou
It’s only had one accident, has only two access roads and on a major fault line. Not sure how high the sea wall is, but looks about 20m? The idea to use helicopters and boats to rescue the stranded residents will expose many more to the disaster.
but who cares?
Aly Rustom
agree
none of the LDP crooks, that's for sure.
nandakandamanda
MOXabustion
Do the hustle
There were no safety risks with Mt. Pinatubo or Mt. St. Helens either and we all know how that turned out. There is no way to know for if the volcanic activity will increase or decrease. The only thing that is sure is, this nuclear plant is dangerously close to an active volcano and if the volcanic activity spreads along the fault Japan will see its second nuclear disaster.
seif
More like has accepted a brown bag.
nandakandamanda
Ah, apologies, moxibustion is the correct spelling for burning moxa.
For burning MOX, though, a mixture of uranium and plutonium in reactor #3 at Ikata, how should we spell it?
socrateos
Do the hustle:
Which volcano are you talking about?
nandakandamanda
He is probably referring to Mt Aso across the straits, about 170 km away as the crow barks, which is dangerous if the whole caldera blows
socrateos
nandakandamanda:
His description, "dangerously close," sounds little exaggerated.
mukashiyokatta
The people DO NOT want it.
nandakandamanda
Agreed, Socrateos, but consider this paragraph from today's news. Put it like this:
"The mountain with five peaks and a number of craters is located in the center of one of the largest calderas in the world, stretching 17 kilometers from east to west and 25 km from north to south. It was formed in a series of enormous eruptions about 90,000 years ago and the volcano remains active today."
Now if that lot went off, some not so small sprinkling of ash might land on the Ikata NPP, and 170 km does not feel such a confidently safe margin any more. The argument revolves upon the likelihood of the caldera blowing, and you could compare that to the likelihood of a tsunami in Fukushima. Unlikely, sure...