The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOJapan mulls extending maximum reactor lifespan beyond 60 years
TOKYO©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
22 Comments
Login to comment
Cricky
You have to be joking! What wombat came up with this idea? So the public are against building new ones, so instead let’s extend further, beyond there use by date our old ones? There are plenty of other alternatives to the question than that. If they had a brain that functioned.
sakurasuki
Do they learn anything from Fukushima?
Tom Doley
First, master the technology of building ALPS treatment plant that properly filters all radioactive isotopes. The crappy Hitachi made equipments failed to remove many radioactive isotopes including tritium in Fukushima. Or better still, don't be so stingy. Buy US made state of the art ones.
drlucifer
60 next 100 years. No surprises, shifting of the gal post is something we see just too often with the LDP government.
Hideomi Kuze
Japan's neo-liberalism LDP government who learn nothing from lessons of Fukushima nuclear disaster, they still stick to old nuclear plants that seismic resistance is lower than modern quake-proof designed house.
OldNormal
just because the USA makes bad decisions, doesn’t mean Japan should do the same.
kurisupisu
The Japanese government is really tempting fate.
jiji Xx
logic at its best.... and my LOL-moment for the day.... (⌒▽⌒)
MrHeisei
In the history of bad ideas, this has to be right up there…
I can image the meeting “The public doesn’t want us to build new nuke plants because of safety concerns, so we won’t… let’s just keep the existing plants running forever”
What could possibly go wrong with this…
Jandworld
You will need a pontifex or bridgebuilder to save from foolishness.
BertieWooster
"Mull" = have meetings, write reports, have more meetings based on reports, write reports based on reports based on meetings, organise study group, have meetings about when findings should be published, write memos, have meeting to discuss impact of findings, partially release findings, go back to "have meetings" and cycle through ad infinitum, collecting ¥20,000,000 of tax payers money each time you pass "go."
joey stalin
They say that everything's fine in Fukushima now, so how much worse can another nuclear disaster be?
Speed
They don't seem to be moving TOWARD renewable green energy resources, are they?
Tora
Of course they are. I could see this one coming from a mile out. It will happen, and everybody will just carry on, until the next disaster.
GW
OMG!! They should be doing the exact OPPOSITE, shutting down reactors when they hit 40yrs.......NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
This story is a perfect example of why Japan has NO FUTURE!!!
ArtistAtLarge
This should be the furthest thought from their minds.
Jobberman
Considering how much safer newer reactor models are, this would be a terrible way to go about things.