The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODOJapan says China, S Korea have both released water with high levels of tritium
TOKYO©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
Video promotion
40 Comments
Login to comment
Tamarama
Nothing like pointing out a little hypocrisy when others are trying to assume moral high ground.
sakurasuki
Now Japan use argument we can did that, because you did that first?
However Japan didn't say how many water Japan will discharge in this press statement.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/02/20/fukushima-japan-prepares-to-release-13-million-tonnes-of-treated-wastewater-into-the-sea
kurisupisu
Adding more radioactivity into the mix is ok then?
A childish viewpoint to say the least
thepersoniamnow
Professional, government funded, choreographed for news, politically motivated.
Sanjinosebleed
All the more reason to stop ALL nuclear power stations worldwide!
gogogo
Weak argument, no one should be releasing anything like this in the sea. This only makes people not want Japan to do this more.
Paul
Like I said before. Other countries would do the same when faced with the same problem. And it has been done before. Hippocrasy is constantly used by politicians to enrage ignorant public.
kwatt
All nuclear power plants all over the world are discharging trituim water out. That’s why all nuclear power plants are sitting nearby ocean or river. China and S Korea are actually discharging more than Japan. France is the number 1 country. It has much more nuclear power plants there.
obladi
So, this is somehow supposed to reassure us that Japan is not releasing high levels of radiation??
Capuchin
It always impresses me just how quickly diplomacy between Japan, South Korea and China descends into childish pettiness.
Newgirlintown
The poor fish, caught in the middle of all this! “Please stop polluting our home”, they’d probably say if they could talk.
Mark
POOR SEA.
Mark
New forms of cancer and types diseases are on the increase and we still think it's okay to Pollute our rivers and sea. How about investing in new sources of energy so we don't rely on Nukes.
dan
Regardless of who releases more tritium into the oceans the point that should be raised is that it is NOT ok for anyone to use the ocean as a dumping ground for our low level nuclear waste.
Why isn't Japan stepping up offshore wind power on a massive scale especially since the Fukushima crisis.
I think it's disgusting personally.
Before you criticise your neighbours put your own house in order.
Enough with they do more so we can do it childish petty antics.
Grow and up and take responsibility Japan.
Uchujin
And what should we use for energy? Coal, oil...?
BeerDeliveryGuy
Every year the coal industry releases more radioactive material into the air and water, than all the nuclear power plants and nuclear bombs ever.
kwatt
Because major power company simply don’t like such wind power or solar power. They want to keep long time nuclear powers. They don't let eco-power suppliers to use the major companies' power line infrastructure to supply to town/city. Such eco companies are just supplying power to nearby locals only right now without major power line.
Goldlink98
Correct on both counts. Everyone knows that both China and Korea’s opposition is based on politics not science.
Fighto!
Korea, China, and Russia are the ones polluting the ocean with dangerous radioactive waste (as well as others), not Japan. But of course they won't admit to this. Instead, SK and China will point the finger at Japan - who will release perfectly clean water - for political gain.
The hypocrisy is appalling - but usual behaviour from the several neighbours who despise Japan.
kokontozai
In the near future we may be able to eat cheap fish, as Chinese and Koreans will stop eating eels, sushi, sanma, etc.
Sister Jane
I totally agree with your assessment, however 2 wrongs do not make a right, and I do believe the levels of any radiation found in fish should be checked periodically, to do otherwise would be a lack of responsibility, which we have seen too much of since the Fukushima disaster. The West cannot control what China does especially, but it can keep their populace informed and safe as much as possible.
The article reminds me of America, every time there is some problem in the states Journalist will say, but wait look at Japan or look over there it's even worse, never discussing what's going on in their own backyard, this article kind of looks similar. (Economy, politics, homelessness.) Wait, look over there, that's called a distraction and it's prevalent everywhere. Your mileage may vary, but as far as I am concerned all governments on Earth have never shown why they should be trusted with almost anything under the Sun. Keep in mind that one of the leading causes of death, especially in the 20th Century was Democide, more than War, however even war can be considered as Democide.
OssanAmerica
They are. The IAEA has affirmed the safety. Grow up.
CKAI
Ya don't say. Scratch scratch scratch…
Sister Jane
I read that also in Scientific American, however some of Scientific Americans articles over the last few years have been a little political as well. So the question is, with such a political weapon as Climate Change seems to have become, do you really trust the source?
Do the hustle
Two wrongs don’t equal a right.
freedom-of-speech
Especially from China and SK, Japan is the adult in this triangel group.
ian
You should share that very important information
ian
Maybe.
But it's s right to ask for fairness or fair treatment.
Peter Neil
Correct, other nuclides will be there. They're all be reduced to far below international standards, then diluted an additional 100 times after that. Tritium cannot be removed efficiently, but it too will be below international and Japanese standards.
kyushubill
Well then if everyone else is jumping odd the skyscraper then by all means jump too. (eye roll)
wallace
Japan will release 22TBq/year.
450 times lower than La Hague.
50 times lower than Sellafield.
The Pacific Ocean contains 8,400 grams of pure Tritium.
Japan will release 0.06 gm/year.
wallace
La Hague releases Tritium water of 11,400 TBq/year. People still eat fish from the area.
John
Japan needs more nuclear power plants. It’s the only known way of producing the cheapest, and the cleanest power in the magnitude of power demand. It needs to be constructed with up to date technology and has to be refurbished once in a while. Current, japan is producing substantially less power than the demand.
Patricia Yarrow
How about reducing the demand, then? Never hear about this tactic for reducing/eliminating the "need" for npp in Japan.
wallace
Patricia Yarrow
That is too late for the Fukushima nuclear disaster which will last more than 100 years. Until the corium is removed water cooling is necessary. Millions and millions of tons of waste and contaminated water.
Japan uses about 903.70 billion kWh. 80% is generated by fossil fuels.
The summer demand in Kanto is reaching maximum supply.
https://www.tepco.co.jp/en/forecast/html/index-e.html
Yamada Taro
South Korea releases more than 16 times more tritium (liquid and gas combined) each year than the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is scheduled to release (22 TBq).
In 2021, 371.06 TBq.
In 2022, 356.01 TBq.
January-March 2023, 118.89 TBq.
In the past, there have been no reported incidents of health problems caused by tritium in South Korea.
South Korean thorium emissions are published by Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power.
https://npp.khnp.co.kr/board/list.khnp?boardId=BBS_0000020&menuCd=DOM_000000103003004001&contentsSid=110