Japan killed 251 minke whales during the 2014 Antarctic hunt, in what is expected to be the last "research whaling" mission in the Southern Ocean after an international court ruling.
According to data released by Japan's Fisheries Agency, the catch was more than double last year's tally of 103 minke whales, but much smaller than the target of 935.
The whalers caught no fin whales during the hunt, which ran between January 3 and March 13, the agency said.
Japan is a signatory to the International Whaling Commission (IWC), which bans commercial hunting, but has insisted its operation was research -- even though it acknowledged the meat from the animals ended up on dinner tables.
Militant environmentalist group Sea Shepherd has annually sent its vessels to the Southern Ocean to confront the whalers, and has in the past taken credit for the vastly-reduced catch.
The United Nations' International Court of Justice in The Hague ruled last week that the program was a commercial hunt disguised as science, vindicating claims by opponents, notably Australia.
In the wake of the verdict, Japan said it was cancelling the annual Antarctic mission for the first time in more than a quarter of a century.
Japan has another research whaling program that operates in the northwestern Pacific.
This hunt, which is not affected by the court ruling, operates two excursions a year, in coastal waters and offshore, from early summer through autumn.
Last year's whaling in the area netted 58 minke whales in coastal waters and 132 mammals -- including minke, sei and sperm whales -- offshore.
Analysts say Japan will likely have to review this program in the Pacific in light of the UN court ruling.
Japanese fishermen also catch a small number of whales in coastal waters under an IWC provision allowing for small-scale "indigenous whaling".
© (c) 2014 AFP
38 Comments
Login to comment
arrestpaul
Sounds like more lies from the eco-terrorist SS. Has any reliable or honest organization backed up their tale?
wtfjapan
Japan intends to continue Antarctic whale hunt with new research program: Sea Shepherd http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-13/japan-planning-to-continue-antarctic-whale-hunt-sea-shepherd/5386550
nath
It's not a "harvest of marine resources".
It's a cruel and inhumane slaughter of mammals, a large proportion being pregnant females, in a manner causing such suffering that it which would not be allowed if it was happening on land.
Whales are not inanimate objects.
Per Christer Lund
Japan has made fools of themselves by calling environmentally sound harvesting of marine resources - in line with fishing - for research purposes. Sea Shepard's childish mediastunts probably made it harder for Japan to - for economic reasons - to pull out of this harvest. I wonder if SS will now shift their attention to real environmental issues? Industrial chicken production in Europe or US for example. Wonder if they get the same media coverage?
budgie
LOL their target was over 900 IIRC. Thanks to Sea shepherd and the ICJ they got less than a third of it. In fact Sea Shepherd has cut short the hunt and reduced numbers every year they've been in operation. Sorry corrupt government-subsidized failing industries: 'eco-terrorism' works.
CH3CHO
letsberealisticApr. 10, 2014 - 07:10PM JST
Why do not you read the real judgment, rather than a "summary" of the judgment? I gave the link to the real judgment in my previous comment. Do you understand the arguments about the difference between "scientific research" and "activities for purpose of scientific research"? You cannot understand what was going on at ICJ unless you read the judgment and see how judges disagreed on the interpritation of the word "purpose" in the convention.
Patricia Yarrow
Eh, "YeahRight", the taste of whale is not the issue here whatsoever. It is not a cuisine issue.
Anyway, give it up, Japan whaling industry. Best photo of the year is the Nisshin Maru returning to port, figuratively with its tail between its legs.
nath
It's an unspeakably cruel kill. You should not be so ignorant, self-centred and insensitive to others suffering.
YeahRight
I'm an American and I eat whale meat every chance I get. Can't give it away? Send it my way! It tastes great. Don't knock it til you try it.
nath
Japanese whalers were not sent in old American ships to hunt whales to provide protein.
They were sent to hunt for whale oil to supply the American military and industry, e.g. the automotive industry which used whale oil in its automatic transmission until the 1970s.
Japan did not need protein after war, it could supply sufficient protein of its own and from other easier sources. It needed carbohydrates as the rice crop failed a number of times. Whales are not good or efficient sources of carbohydrate.
I do wish such face saving myths would not keep being repeated ad nauseum. America aggressively opened up Japan for the sake of its utterly exploitive whaling industry in 1850s and then in the 20th demanded Japan hunt for it.
I sort of appreciate the Japanese point of view, about Western schizophrenic bullying, from a historical point of view. However, it would be more in Japan's interests to stop the slaughter altogether.
CH3CHO
letsberealisticApr. 10, 2014 - 01:53PM JST
You can read the dissenting opinions of the 4 judges here. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=64&case=148&code=aj&p3=4 They are indeed saying that JARPA2 research whaling is scientific research and legitimate. Actually, all 16 judges agreed JARPA2 is scientific research. 11judges said that, though JARPA2 is scientific research, it is not for purpose of scientific research. 4 judges disagreed that any scientific research is for purpose of scientific research. 1 judge from China found JARPA is for purpose of scientific research but is not allowed for whatever reason I cannot understand after reading his opinion.
Never heard of it. At least, Scientific Commitee of Internatuonal Whaling Commission welcomed JARPA2.
kurisupisu
What a waste of resources and life!!!
fxgai
If we are serious, Japan was certainly aiming to conduct research - the fact that you've got 4 judges dissent in the 12-4 majority and side with Japan made that clear.
The ICJ majority of judges just put a burden of proof on Japan, the defendant, instead of on Australia, but there is no suggestion that there was bad faith on Japan's part. I mean, look at the decision - the ICJ has left Japan the option of firing up a new project, so long as it's better justified than the last one was. That's not a telling them off for being deceitful.
(That 4 judges dissented makes you wonder. If there weren't a few less judges from anti-whaling countries on the panel what the result might have been? Even the French judge sided with Japan.)
igloobuyer
OssanAmerica
So now you're a whale preservation supporter? Great.
The point being they deliberately set out to deceive the international community. They thought, "hey, we can continue whaling if we claim to do research - then we don't have to deal with any 'meiwaku' , or disrupt the 'wa' (or tatemae)." As you no doubt are aware, avoiding 'trouble' trumps openness and honesty. But this won't wash in the international community where honesty is more greatly valued. Hopefully, Japan has learnt from the experience.
BertieWooster
Japan?
Japan killed them?
What, en masse?
OssanAmerica
Honest? If you want to preserve whales what difference does it make whether they are killed for research or food? If you read the ICJ ruling Japan is free to carry on Research Whaling provided it modifies it's program. There is no assurance that they will though.
cleo
251 too many.
The 12-4 majority judged that the whaling programme was not planned or carried out for purposes of scientific research
No it didn't. It pointed out that although the initial quota was huge, the actual numbers taken were low and so were of little use in achieving the stated aims of the 'research' for which the huge numbers were claimed to be necessary (why else have such huge quotas?). Despite this, the icr made no attempt at all to revise its research aims - this is what the ICJ criticised.
The whalers caught no fin whales during the hunt also no humpbacks, yet one of the stated aims of the 'research' is "modelling competition among whale species". They took only one species of whale, from which it is impossible to carry out any kind of "modelling competition among whale species", making it obvious that research was not the purpose of the harpoon fest.
igloobuyer
At least its being honest - Norway and Iceland are open and honest about what they do. Japan demonstrated a propensity for being deceitful and has damaged its international image.
CH3CHO
It is not a ban but a moratorium which was supposed to be cancelled by 1990. It is a shame that the “moratorium,” or a temporal stop of commercial whaling, continued such a long time.
In_japanApr. 10, 2014 - 10:58AM JST
Read the ICJ ruling. ICJ criticized that the number of whales hunted by Japan was too small.
Disillusioned
This is how ridiculous Japan's research whaling is (was): They set a target of nearly a thousand whales to make the research commercially viable by selling the meat. The purpose of their research was to prove commercial whaling was viable. At present there is 5,000 tons of whale meat stored around the country that they can't even give away. If SS hadn't harassed them and kept their catch to around 25% of their quota there would be 15,000 tons more whale meat rotting in freezers around the country. Commercial whaling can never be viable if there is no market to sell the meat regardless of their research to show there are ample whale stocks. It's just absolutely ridiculous! They have wasted tens of millions of dollars on this farce and even used money from the Tohoku rebuilding fund. My guess is, the Japan Fisheries Dept. is actually glad their research was outlawed by the ICJ. It gave them a chance to pull out of this money pit and blame it on western culture Interfering with Japanese culture.
In_japan
Wow the target was 935? for scientific research? INSANE
Iowan
Minke Whales 0: Japan 251
Disillusioned
The animals do not end up on dinner tables! They end up in freezers cos next to nobody eats the crap!
HaraldBloodaxe
Japan says it killed 251 minke whales in final Antarctic hunt
And learned what?
bruinfan
@OssanAmerican,
You present what is called in logic, a false dichotomy. There are other views.
wtfjapan
251 whales thatll probably end up a pet food.
CrazyJoe
Japan's research whaling is phony as a three dollar bill.
bass4funk
Logical enough to know that exterminating a species is NOT the right way to go.
Christopher Smith
Shame Japanese Whalers, shame! hang your head.
Dara Danh
Problem with commercial whaling is that there doesn't seem to be much of a market for it. Where is the demand? It's not very big. It's not like it's tuna, which is the global demand, especially with the popularity with sushi and sashimi.
fxgai
AFP seem to get it wrong a lot and on a variety of subjects.
This idea from AFP that it is the last whaling in the Antarctic is not accurate at all, it's only going to erroneously build up expectations.
The ICJ court ruling didn't say Japan's whaling was commercial whaling in disguise, they said it was broadly scientific research, but the 12-4 majority judged that it wasn't up to snuff.
They made it clear that Japan can design a new research plan so long as Japan addresses the points in the ICJ ruling.
Of course, Japan might call it quits, but the ICJ decision doesn't oblige it to.
gkhster
"To hunt a species to extinction is not logical."
"Whoever said the human race was logical?"
OssanAmerica
So you guys will be happy if Japan resumes Commercial Whaling under objection like Norway and Iceland does? Or maybe simply leaves the IWC and resumes unregulated Commercial Whaling?
el
I hate to say it, but technically according to IWC rules it is NOT wrong for the meat to be sold for food after "scientific" whaling is carried out, what is wrong is to waste the meat. It's not widely known, but the IWC was originally set up to manage WHALING, not whales.
Another thing that's not widely known is that eating whale was not all that widespread in Japan until after World War Two, when the Occupation encouraged it as a good source of protein that was readily available and cheap.
Magnet
The only thing being researched is how they much of the international community can they fool with commercial whaling under the guise of science.
bass4funk
Research?? What a joke!