Central Japan Railway Co (JR Tokai) said it will start replacing almost half of the shared toilets with women-only toilets on shinkansen trains this month, with work to be completed by March 15.
JR Tokai said in a statement that one of the two shared toilets located in odd-numbered cars of the 16-car trains on the Tokaido and Sanyo Shinkansen will be women-only. However, car 11 will be excluded.
With the proportion of female passengers increasing to nearly half, there have been calls for women-only toilets, JR Tokai said.
Until now, there were three toilets in odd-numbered cars except for car 11, with two shared toilets and one men's only. The one shared toilet will now be women-only.
© Japan Today
18 Comments
BertieWooster
When they say women only, I hope they mean actual women, the traditional kind, with female bodies.
Moderator
Readers, please do not start that debate on this thread.
Abe234
So that’s a reduction for people who might have a condition to jump into the closest toilet. It was perfectly fine before. There is no need for that debate cause they were for everybody. But some people have a desperate need and can’t wait for that one single male/female toilet to be free. If there is a toilet free people with a certain condition are now barred from using it. Bummer! No pun intended!
smithinjapan
Here we go! By doing this, as they have with women-only cars, they are introducing the argument that it's now a woman's fault if she's assaulted in a regular toilet, and police will ask them, "Well, why didn't you use the women-only toilet?" same as they now ask women who were groped in regular cars why they didn't use the women-only car if one was available. It's not only sexist, but it delegitimizes any assault claims made in the non women-only cars/toilets.
itsonlyrocknroll
There is no justification or logical necessity for women only toilets on public transportation.
It you need to "spend a penny" or in urgent need "passing a sturdy breakfast", having to search bent double for a gender relevant bathroom is tortuous.
Abbey
Why should women get special treatment ? !
travelbangaijin
There is a men-only urinal on the train with a clear glass so everybody can see the guy using it
asdfghjkl
I was going to come on here and complain why women should get special treatment, when we are consistently arguing for equality. However, this is fair I believe. Men’s have urinals on the Shinkansen, so if women passengers increase it is natural they have more toilet capacity geared towards women. Just think of it as a women’s urinal.
Pukey2
bertie:
Those bogs are for one person at a time. Or maybe you know something I don't.
travel:
There are urinals at my local station and they are exposed. Some men appreciate privacy too. I find it disgusting and backwards
hooktrunk2
Could the reason also be that as men we we often stand up to pee and the toilet seat, along with the floor in front of the toilet, often get messy?
wallace
Will they be additional toilets or replace existing ones?
リッチ
Women can’t put the seat down. Single stall toilets should be genderless. No point. Can’t women put the seat down. It’s equally their job to do so. Lol
proxy
Why? What is the rational? If they are worried about a man hiding a camera, I have news for them, woman hide cameras too and profit from voyeur, illegal photography too.
Or are woman to "sensitive" to male donors? Female poop and gas smells too.
ebisen
The rationale is that males (and women, etc. with penises) have dvd can use the urinals, but actual females (with vulvas) don't and can't. All of the sitting stalls were gender neutral (aka normality).
proxy
Will they also ban woman from using all other washrooms? Men will be shut out of a significant number of vital washrooms and woman will also occupy the gender-neutral washrooms. It should be illegal for them to not provide equal washroom accessibility to men
proxy
@ebisen
I kid you not, I was a man pooping in a urinal last week because the stalls were occupied and he had the runs.
The other option available for him was to crap his pants.
proxy
"I saw" not "I was." lol
TaiwanIsNotChina
Or you are just needless spamming something you know is divisive. One or the other.