A strong 6.5 magnitude earthquake hit eastern Japan on Wednesday, the U.S. Geological Survey said, but local authorities said there was no risk of a tsunami.
The quake, measured at 6.9 by Japanese seismologists, was centered on a spot more than 600 kilometers south of Tokyo, the USGS said.
The quake struck at 9:18 a.m. at a depth of 404 kilometers, the USGS said. It was felt in Miyagi, Fukushima, Tochigi, Ibaraki, Saitama, Chiba and Kanagawa prefectures, as well as in Tokyo where it registered a 3.
A spokesman for the Japan Meteorological Agency said there was no risk of a tsunami.
Fukushima nuclear plant operator TEPCO reported there were no new problems at the stricken nuclear plant.
"We have confirmed that there was no immediate abnormality," according to data collected by monitoring equipment, a TEPCO spokesman said, adding that crews will patrol the crippled plant's vast campus to survey whether any physical damage has been caused.
© (C) 2013 AFP
38 Comments
Login to comment
Mirai Hayashi
only an M3 in Tokyo? Are you sure? It felt much bigger than an M3...maybe shindo 3?
Harry_Gatto
It's sometimes difficult to comprehend the forces involved when an earthquake 400 km underground can shake so much of the earth's crust. Anyway, apart from scaring my dog, no harm done.
Ms. Alexander
It was a bit long too :(
gokai_wo_maneku
I thought it was more like 3.14159265359.
techall
You mean in addition to the myriad of abnormalities you have going on right now?
SushiSake3
Was riding a bike in west Tokyo.
Didn't feel a thing.
knowitall
AFP/JT is mixing apples and oranges.
"6.5 magnitude" is how powerful it was in terms of energy released.
"Tokyo where it registered a 3" indicates seismic intensity (how much shaking at a specific point) on the Japanese "shindo" scale.
Magnitude does not change depending on location. A 6.5 magnitude quake is a 6.5 magnitude quake. Period.
Unfortunately, whoever compiled/edited this for AFP doesn't know his earthquakes. I am no expert, but I certainly know the difference between magnitude and shindo.
Get Real
The weirdest thing was how quiet it was - no rumble.
knowitall
I think you misunderstood me. I was speaking of the 6.5 (or 6.9) and 3 difference. I have no problems "dealing with" USGS and JMA difference. I was merely pointing out that the article gave no definition for the "3". The "3" is NOT magnitude.
Please re-read my comment, and you will see that made no reference at all to the USGS and JMA difference.
theResident
It was a Shindo 3 in the 23 wards.
CrazyJoe
Most Japanese don't think in terms of magnitude, they think in terms of the shindo. number (not the energy released but the degree of shaking).
shinhiyata
Everyone felt it here in Iwate, but the Japan Meteorological Agency site has been knocked out since it happened so I still have no idea as to the extent of the event 2 hours later.
CGB Spender
It woke me up. Thanks earthquake, didn't wanted to sleep long anyway.
Disillusioned
So, where are these experts that claim they can predict these quakes and the active fault lines? Didn't hear any phone alarms going off. Go ahead! Turn all reactors back on. It's ok!
betterdays
This one was really gentle...
Cortes Elijah
I was at work and did not feel a thing. @Kawasaki
kimuzukashiiiii
I hate to be the voice of impending doom here, but there has been a flurry of activity down the south of Japan recently. Alot of smaller ones around Southern Wakayama too, which are not making news. And a bigger one in Kansai a couple of months ago too.
I would not be surprised if the very long awaited Tokai Earthquake is on its way soon.
kaykay
Didn't feel a thing here in Shibuya.....
Knox Harrington
Inside an elevator. Shook a little - not too bad but still, I'd rather not experience that again.
Christian del Castillo
Jeez, a magnitude 6.9 is now considered 'moderate'?! http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20130903-712122.html What is considered a 'strong' earthquake nowadays?
AkariYoshida
there were no reports of damage in this article so I do pray that no one was seriously injured
Mirai Hayashi
What is your basis of comparison? 30 years ago, and M5 earthquake was considered strong, but buildings weren't as earthquake proof back then. The Hanshin earthquake changed building standards so they can tolerate M7 earthquakes. Now something like a 6.9 is considered moderate and anything bigger than 7 - 7.5 is considered major.
Elbuda Mexicano
Sorry, in my part of Tokyo, the western part, I felt NOTHING! My Yurekuru, Iphone application that is supposed to warn me about a quake?? Nothing! I have looked up the history on the quakes and it is not even there, but the only way I found out was that I talked to a friend, I guess he was sitting and started to say TEMBLOR, TEMBLOR, Spanish for earthquake but he was another part of Tokyo, anyway I do hope no big quakes come to Fukushima etc..
Himajin
The phone app only goes off for anything Shindo 4 or over, it's only 4 or over where you get damage. As it was a 3 in Tokyo your phone was not supposed to go off. I think you can elect to be warned of quakes under 4, but it's a choice..the default is 4 or over.
Vernie Jefferies
It felt more like a 3.9 in the Tokyo area and it lasted a long time.
Graham DeShazo
We (here in Tokyo especially) were very lucky that it was so deep. If it had been shallow, it would have been bad.
AramaTaihenNoYouDidnt
Currently working in Kanagawa Prefecture, no one notice or felt a thing till it was annouced on the intercom system. So much for alerting the public beforehand, huh!?
Mirai Hayashi
Having these small to moderate earthquakes periodically is a good thing. It releases built up pressure making it less likely of having a bigger quake. Its when you don't have an earthquake for a very long time in an quake-prone area like Japan, is when you should really be worried.
CH3CHO
http://bousai.tenki.jp/bousai/earthquake/seismicity_map/?area_type=japan_detail&recent_type=7days
I can see only 2 earthquakes near Wakayama in the last 7 days. The earthquake activities are concentrated in Tohoku area lately.
tokyo123
season start for earth quake Hope every one save