Japan's Nuclear Regulatory Authority has released guidelines following new research into the effects of exposure to nuclear radiation in humans.
The authority recommends that those living within a 30-km radius of a nuclear crisis of the magnitude of that at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant should be given iodine as quickly as possible. The authority's research suggests that this should reduce by about 20% radiation that comes into contact with the thyroid gland while breathing, Fuji TV reported.
The guidelines also recommend that those living within 5 km of a disaster site be evacuated outside of the 30-km exclusion zone, where exposure to radioactive material is around 100 times lower. The authority added that the 30-km exclusion zone could be expanded in the case of adverse weather conditions.
Although the guidelines are the result of the authority's latest research, the Nuclear Safety Commission recommended local authorities instruct evacuees leaving the exclusion zone to ingest stable iodine to protect against thyroid cancer back on March 16, 2011, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The recommendation was also made by the World Health Organization decades earlier. In a 1999 guideline, the WHO recommended the stockpiling of stable iodine. However, it added, "For adults over 40, the scientific evidence suggests that stable iodine prophylaxis not be recommended unless doses to the thyroid from inhalation are expected to exceed levels that would threaten thyroid function. This is because the risk of radiation induced thyroid carcinoma in this group is very low while, on the other hand, the risk of side effects increases with age."
© Japan Today
44 Comments
Login to comment
caffeinebuzz
Oh they don't say...Are all of these kinds of revisements and "new" recommendations going to be filed in a "Too Little Too Late", dossier?
nath
Does this mean that the government body now recognizes the fact that nuclear exposure is dangerous?
Speed
I can't believe this is being recommended now. Almost two years later. Iodine tablets were the very first things I considered when the plants were exploding out radiation. What an irresponsible government this is.
Realistic
after one an half years? Where were these guys hidden before?
Simperial
The problem seem to be much worse according to The Examiner: http://smt.blogs.com/mari_diary/2005/06/enjoy_tokyo_vie.html, http://www.examiner.com/article/fukushima-dire-warning-over-4-million-japanese-cancer-deaths
Disillusioned
Ah, Japan! You've done it again! It is normal for them to ignore international pressure, but now the Japanese authority has suggested it (18 months too late( I wonder how long it will take them to implement it, if at all!
Jerome_from_Utah
Well, if they are recommending supplemental iodine, why not supplemental potassium? Cesium is a Group I-A alkali metal that can react essentially the same as potassium. In the body, sodium is extra-cellular while potassium is intra-cellular meaning that cesium would tend to stay in the cell once it gets there. The object is to "head it off at the pass". Potassium is readily available as salt substitute such as Nu Salt here in the USA and employed to reduce blood pressure or make up potassium deficiency.
wanderlust
And which local bureaucrat, community or government official will actually make the decision, and ensure that people receive their dose in time? When the reactors melted down, they already had stockpiles of potassium iodide (the palatable, absorbable form of iodine) ready for an emergency, but did not give them out....
Patric Spohn
Zichi, exactly. Iodine has to be taken before being exposed in order to fully saturate your body and to stay safe. A little bit late now, no?
basroil
These idiots are going to destroy children's thyroids with unnecessary iodine. They should follow the WHO/IAEA recommendation, since giving people 700 times more iodine than the body normally needs is not healthy. In fact, the recommended level for those over 40, the point where the benefits outweigh the risks, is about 5Gy (5Sv), far larger than anyone will ever be exposed to because of a civil reactor incident (other than workers at the plant).
Lets not forget the KI can cause birth defects, so unless these people rethink their plans, we will see mass panic and people actually hurting themselves more.
basroil
Jerome_from_UtahDec. 02, 2012 - 09:41AM JST
Think of it this way:
You can put ALL of the CS137 released by fukushima in your kitchen sink. While proper potassium balance helps shorten the biological halflife substantially, it won't do much in short term. KI on the other hand can cut biological halflife to pretty much only what it takes for you to go to the bathroom (iodine intake is a bit harder, needed amounts much lower). The issue with iodine is that it doesn't need to be eaten to get into your system.
However, if you happen to be a potato or other produce, a potassium fortified soil can reduce CS137 levels in the final product several fold, enough to be safe to eat even from above legal limit farm soils. Since almost all the caesium you will ever ingest is from food, it's best to reduce the levels in foods and water rather than season yourself up with kg's of salt.
nandakandamanda
Strange article, taken slightly out of context. The Nuclear Safety Commission has been meeting to look back at Fukushima, find out exactly what went wrong, and to draw up recommendations, general rule-of-thumb guidelines for the future, I believe. In consultation with doctors, they have somewhat cautiously recommended iodine intake as part of the plan of action, although the wording said that the iodine should be taken before any proposed exposure, whatever that means. Stay indoors, take your iodine in preparation to evacuate? (The above is only my impression from reading Japanese sources.)
basroil
FarmboyDec. 02, 2012 - 10:36AM JST
While Prussian Blue is generally non-toxic, it is not recommended when the intake is less than 2mSv. It is generally reserved for medical accidents, and it does nothing about continued doses. It is best to reduce the amount of CS intake rather than take extra chemicals to remove something twice as fast (typical biological halflife is 70 days, halflife with blue is 30 days).
The only positive info they could ever release is that they are doing away with circles and instead using actual fallout maps to determine evacuations, if needed. And if evacuations were needed, that they be done properly rather than quickly, since there is usually never a short term risk, only a long term one from exposure (but a huge short term risk from evacuations)
basroil
marcelitoDec. 02, 2012 - 11:07AM JST
Largest source of radiation exposure for Japanese people is actually medical radiation. All the fukushima radiation noted from researchers is in the range of 1000Sv, with average exposure around 1mSv. Medical radiation averages 2mSv per person in Japan each year, so that would be in the range of 300000Sv each and every year. Clearly it would be far more effective to turn away from radiological medicine.
basroil
FarmboyDec. 02, 2012 - 01:16PM JST
FDA only states if it's safe to use. In fact, your link does NOT contain any use recommendations. The internationally accepted level, and the level currently used in Japan, is 2mSv of contamination after a short dose. It is never recommended for long term use (since it is far more effective to prevent further accumulation than remove it at a faster rate than accumulation).
In the case of CS137 contamination, it is far more likely you will cross the 2mSv threshold from an accident, like radio-medical equipment failures, than from a contaminated area with prompt evacuation. That has nothing to do with FDA (though they state medical radiology as an important source of CS137), simply statistics.
globalwatcher
So what else is J-Gov hiding now?
I am confused as Fukushima Governor Sato is promoting Fukushima rice is safe to eat, no?
bajhista65
Is JGovt implementing it?
smithinjapan
"As quickly as possible", eh? Only took 632 days and endless deliberation to THINK about it. Keep in mind we are taking Japan here, so it'll actually be another four or five years and six Prime Ministers before anything takes effect since it's not an unnecessary construction project.
BertieWooster
The true situation in Fukushima is not being reported in news media in Japan.
Anyone who thinks of supporting Abe or any party that is pro-nuclear power really needs to see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-4dJK9sG3o
basroil
BertieWoosterDec. 02, 2012 - 03:28PM JST
This video is pure misinformation and downright wrong in many cases. The few parts it is right about are the ones the media has already mentioned. The person speaking has zero credentials, and is just fear mongering.
If you would like to actually know the consequences of fallout, ask any of the scientists at Los Alamos National Labs that inhaled "lethal" doses of plutonium 60 years ago. The 30 or so men should have died 7 times over from cancer by the late 80s, yet nobody died from cancer and in fact their mortality rate was lower than expected (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3980212). That video should never be used again as "source" materials, as it's completely wrong about everything that is pertinent to the article.
Dave Louthan
If there is a nuclear accident and you want to be part of it go right ahead.
BertieWooster
How about this one, then?
http://truth-out.org/news/item/8972-the-worst-yet-to-come?-why-nuclear-experts-are-calling-fukushima-a-ticking-time-bomb
alladin
TEPCO should get together with the Japanese beaurocrats and government officials and take these iodine capsules themselves!!!!
If you ask me, I think Japan should just shut down all of the reactors and stop playing games with people's lives.
BertieWooster
zichi-san,
It's very difficult to gather a real picture of the situation when so many viewpoints carefully select which information to present and which to omit. I think it's worth taking a look at various opinions as the Japanese news media has been rather careless on these points.
I haven't gone into it in the detail that you have, but it does seem to me that nuclear power in a country as earthquake/tsunami ridden as this is not a good idea.
basroil
BertieWoosterDec. 02, 2012 - 06:58PM JST
Yes, that's why you should check many and believe none entirely. Your links are to known anti-nuclear "environmentalists" who don't actually have any facts, rather just unsubstantiated opinions. Try checking google scholar for relevant articles, those usually present the facts without too much opinion (but often very specific, so you won't see everything from just one article, you'll need dozens).
They occasionally do, but they aren't in the business for activism, they are in it for ratings. If they had actually cared they should have complained 10 years ago when the IAEA revisions came out and Japan decided to ignore them for another 5 years.
Itaru
Probably I will not follow recommendation.
Remember that radioactive material get out because 1) all electric supply lost including 4 emergency generator, 2) Mark 1 has very small pressure vessel and can not survive without ventilation, 3) Wet vent (which remove radioactive from vent) could not be used because of loss of power, and 4) Filter was not installed for dry ventilation.
If reason is clear and workaround is done, as understandable way, I can trust. I am complete cowardice and never forget to drive without seat belt. But probably do not worry about Tacoma bridge collapse again.
Charles M Burns
A day late and a dollar short.....
Elbuda Mexicano
Surprise! Surprise ??? Not!!
JanesBlonde
This continued lack of real leadership is so depressing.
Curtis Wilson
Now if only we could get the coal companies to supply gas masks to everyone then we would all be safer.
nedinjapan
So let me tell you the truth that the Japanese government is covering from the public: the children living near Fukushima power plant and contaminated areas around will have higher rates of cancer, not just thyroid, that will peak at about 40 to 50 years since the accident. It won't be just thyroid, because food and water is and will be contaminated. The talk about thyroid cancer risk should not make people forget the risks in water and food (besides iodine in air).
basroil
nedinjapanDec. 03, 2012 - 08:24AM JST
Thyroid issues from radiation exposure typically peak around 10 years after. In the case of Chernobyl, there were an excess of 1000 cases of thyroid cancer, with less than a dozen resulting in death. Of those it's almost impossible to know how many dere do to under-reporting before the accident. All other types of cancer have been entirely within expected numbers (statistically insignificant in terms of cases per 100000 people)
Iodine is not a risk outside of the first month. Generally KI tablets are only necessary if there is a very high initial dose possible, and are not meant for long term use. If conditions are severe enough to require tablets, prompt evacuation should be considered a higher priority.