The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODONumber of medical graduates in Japan lowest among OECD countries
TOKYO©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
27 Comments
Login to comment
Chip Star
Says a man. What a surprise.
This is not logical, but that's not a surprise given the poster.
Tom
I totally agree with Zichi. These people are great doctors, and it is very cheap to be taken care of even with long term medical care.
virusrex
How come this is so hard to understand? it takes 6 years for a student to graduate, so even if the numbers of students doubled every year for the last past years it would still means this year the number of graduates would not change. The time needed for admitted students is the "lag".
commanteer
Yep. Surgeons are especially soon to be replaced - probably the worst career path for a young doctor. What we really need are more GPs, or even well-trained nurses, in Japan. As it is, people often have to bounce from one doctor to another to find out what their problem is, and many doctors in Japan are reluctant to send income-providing patients to another doctor even when they have no idea what the problem is.
A good GP would act as a consultant to a patient, referring them to various specialists until the health condition is identified.
garypen
Good luck with the treatment. I've been having annual PSA tests for the last 5 or 6 years now, and am due for my next in Dec. If I ever get bad news, I will most definitely look into that robotic surgery. Sounds like the way to go.
I'll bet that even if you're on the National hoken and have a 30% co-pay, your tests, exams, and procedures will cost you less out-of-pocket than if you had a top-tier insurance plan in the US with only a 10% co-pay.
Peter Neil
Ironically, I am working on a project now that will take results from a physical screen using technology that will automatically identify the parameters a clinician normally observes, then the algorithm will follow through on reading and identifying abnormalities for diagnosis and subsequent treatment. The process will free up the time of the high value clinician by also creating all of the documentation necessary for treatment, patient records, information for the patient and reporting for insurance payment.
More patients will be able to be seen, and the most important value will be reducing mistakes in diagnosis. Mistaken medical diagnosis is a chronic problem due to human fatigue, distraction and lack of training.
Ganbare Japan!
This shouldnt be seen as a "problem " at all. Japan has the highest life expectancy in the world, even with this so-called shortage of medical graduates.
Japanese government should not change the ratio of medical students at all. Robots and AI are the future of medicine, and Japan is taking lead in both. The fact Nations like Ireland have 4 times the medical graduates as Japan means they do not have the technology of Japan, and probably more sick people on average.
goldorak
Wouldn't read too much into this tbh. Hundreds of thousands of med students study/graduate abroad every year hence some rather 'strange' numbers on the OECD link provided by M3.
Most eastern european &/or Baltic countries have launched a 'study medicine in Estonia/Romania/Lithuania etc' program in recent years and attract thousands of euros, north am etc seeking an affordable (and in some cases easier - gaining admission to medical schools is more difficult in some countries than it is in others) alternative for their medical studies, in their own language (yep you can study med in eng, german, french, possibly italian, in some east euro counties). That's why countries like canada, the us, france etc have relatively low numbers and why Belgium (esp with francophones) and Ireland -who've always attracted thousands of foreign students- are ranked 1 & 2.
Nothing alarming about Japan's med students numbers; doctor-population ratio, overall quality, right number of docs per specialty (probably need more urologists than say pediatricians in 2019 japan) etc are imo much more important/relevant. Many developed countries are actually trying to make GP and other 'unsexy' specialties more attractive as a career option (most med students want to be cardiologist, plastic/neuro surgeons, anesth etc...wonder why $$!!??)
Again not very significant.
Jtsnose
If there are not enough people who qualify as physicians, Japan may wish to consider increasing number of practical, licensed nurses. Not uncommon for medical care in U. S. to be obtained through a nurse's office.
talaraedokko
Do they have WiFi in the classrooms?
Peter Neil
Here are some facts about Japanese medical education. Most here appear to not know about the system in Japan.
Just 10 years ago, the percentage of women in medical school was 32%. I wonder what's happened in the last 10 years?
It's also only been 13 years since Japanese medical students have been required to serve a two year internship after graduation. They don't have to work 80 hours in slave-like conditions as some countries require. They are only required to work 40 hours per week and are paid a reasonable salary.
There is no such thing as a general practitioner or GP specialty. Board certified specialization is only becoming standardized recently. It wasn't that long ago that a doctor could simply change their specialty or focus of their own practice by simply putting up a new sign. Of course, they could not suddenly become a surgeon, since no hospital would allow it.
Almost all Japanese medical school students start directly out of high school. Very few apply after already graduating from university. There is no "pre-med" curriculum or requirement to have a pre-med degree before taking tests for medical school entrance. So, Japanese medical education is 6 years of medical school, followed by a 2 year residency, then licensing. A licensed doctor could be 27 years old in Japan.
As a comparison, US requires 4 years undergraduate, followed by 4 years of medical school and 3-7 years in residency before licensing. So most licensed doctors are about 30 years old or more.
kohakuebisu
Yet more proof of poor planning for the inevitable aging of Japanese society. The aged population swelling just as lots of the doctors retire. All entirely predictable from demographics.
A lot of GP type medicine can be automated now, that flu test for example, so this may not be the problem it was twenty years ago. If someone has a fluttery heartbeat, an Apple Watch can monitor it and give warnings. On the downside, younger Japanese eat a worse diet and sit around more (deskwork, computers, etc) than older ones, so the next generation of retirees are likely to be less healthy than the current ones. Even with less smoking.
Yubaru
The nursing numbers are deceiving, as the education requirements for nurses here differs greatly from other OECD countries as well.
While it's wiki, the information is rather "informative"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_in_Japan#Types_of_nurses
M3M3M3
If you look at the same OECD data set, you'll see that Japan is still churning out a large number of nursing graduates. This is where statistics can be misleading imo. To what extent does Japan (or any ageing society) need more fully trained doctors? Is nursing care is actually more relevant to healthcare outcomes? What is the doctor to nurse ratio in these countries and what is the ideal ratio? How easy is it to become a nurse vs a low level junior doctor in each country?
For example, Austria has the highest per capita rate of doctors in the OECD but the number of nurses per capita in Austria seems very low (about half of the number compared to Germany). What accounts for the difference? Is it actually a quality of care issue or just a bureaucratic licensing issue?
https://data.oecd.org/healthres/medical-graduates.htm#indicator-chart
Halwick
In other words, they haven't been successful in increasing the number of students admitted to medical school because of lower-than-expected number of students applying and they're trying to figure out how why and having no answers, their excuse is "lag"?
I'm curious about the number of people in Japan who applied for premed or med schools per 100,000 population and how it compares to the other 35 OECD countries. Anybody got those statistics?
If you have lower number of applicants to begin with, regardless of gender, don't expect high number of graduates.
The cynic in me suggests that young people nowadays prefer less difficult and less demanding and more "fun" career paths, which rules out medical school.
erbaviva
We don't have to worry, AI can do the jobs of medical doctors. That is the future worry.
Chip Star
Too right.
Japan's mysogynistic ways continuing to bite it in the arse.
Yubaru
Due to "lags" ? What the hell is a "lag"?
Kind of hard to increase the number of doctors when you have medical schools that are biased against women entering the schools.
Do the hustle
Well, perhaps medical institutions in Japan should stop discriminating against women.