national

Rubella infection spikes in Japan

13 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© KYODO

©2018 GPlusMedia Inc.

13 Comments
Login to comment

Get vaccinated. Isn't this a standard childhood vaccination?

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Apalling! why aren't they vaccinated!

3 ( +7 / -4 )

I wonder if they were vaccinated and perhaps it's worn off. Not sure about rubella but a few years back I caught whooping cough, b/c once you hit 40 your childhood immunization can wear off. It did and the Japanese name for WC (hyakunichizeki) is spot on. Coughed my brains out for more than 3 months.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Immunity for many vaccines only lasts around 30 years or so. Generally this is enough to get over childhood when the diseases are most dangerous, but with people having children later, lack of immunity to rubella can be a risk for pregnant women.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

I thought every women receives rubella vaccinations in her early teens. Oh, hang on! That’s in countries where it is 2018. I forgot it’s still 1918 in Japan.

-3 ( +5 / -8 )

Looks like Japan isn't immune to anti-vaccination nuttas.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Looks like Japan isn't immune to anti-vaccination nuttas.

I don't know if the anti-vaxx idiots are to blame in Japan, but in countries where this thinking has taken hold, there is going to be a massive spike in illnesses that had been virtually eradicated. It is actually this near elimination that makes people less frightened of them: "Rubella, what's that?"

7 ( +7 / -0 )

Blame China

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

SARS, bird flu, swine flu

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

I thought every women receives rubella vaccinations in her early teens. Oh, hang on! That’s in countries where it is 2018.

I think that's only in your mind. Rubella vaccination is recommended for all young children (i.e. boy and girls) between about ages 1 to 5. As the vaccination is considered potentially harmful to a fetus in the early stages of pregnancy, I think giving the vaccination to all girls in their early teens would be considered risky.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Vaccinate.... and refuse school and care to children not vaccinated. The science is conclusive on saftey

4 ( +4 / -0 )

I think giving the vaccination to all girls in their early teens would be considered risky.

You think wrong. Before the MMR it was normal for girls aged 12 and 13 to be vaccinated for rubella in the UK. You have to vaccinate before they are sexually active, the HPV vaccine is given at this age for the same reason.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Before the MMR it was normal for girls aged 12 and 13 to be vaccinated for rubella in the UK. 

But was it a good idea? I've read that the UK rubella program for adolescent girls was considered a failure, and was revised to cover infants and only "targeted" adolescents.

I actually contracted rubella in the UK in 1978 when I was 23. The doctor initially suggested I attend a "rubella party" which was where infected adults mixed with young girls in order to infect them. (Sounds weird.) He later told me that the idea was no longer in vogue.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites