The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2013 AFPTEPCO starts removing fuel rods from Fukushima No. 4 reactor
By Kyoko Hasegawa TOKYO©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© 2013 AFP
48 Comments
Login to comment
smartacus
Good luck everybody.
smithinjapan
It's hard to imagine a year without a TEPCO mistake, given the companies vast experience in mistakes, and that makes this even scarier.
Cricky
Welcome back Zichi. You predicted everything. Have missed you. I am worried about this whole procedure, goes wrong it's a massive disaster. Really really don't want to be intwined in another not of my own doing. I would and am paying more for a light, just wish it did not come with so much concern.
Jean Val-Jean
Have a plan ready to evacuate, just in case.
smithinjapan
Jean: I honestly think that's a good idea at this point.
Thunderbird2
To those ready to run... what about your Japanese friends who can't runn away? Shades of March 2011 again.
Back on topic, and fingers crossed that all goes to plan. I'm sure that the people carrying out this operation aren't the same agency workers/contractors who built the tanks.
techall
Zichi: Thanks for the link but I think those photos are file photos showing the process, not actual photos of the work going on now.
Rick Kisa
So, why rely on such an unpredictable, dangerous, anti-people, dirty, precarious, inconveniencing and expensive source of electricity (nuke), which will keep japanese captives for decades? Bocz of money? Theres is more to life than money!! Germany has shown the way..
FightingViking
Welcome back Zichi ! I guess I'm not the only one who missed you !
I really hope everything does go well ! I couldn't help noticing this sentence in the article :
...but until now, they said it's anything but "routine"... In one article it mentioned these "operations" being the first in the whole world...
hkitagawa
Better to cleaning up in 1 year than 10. The cost will be ten times less...
moomoochoo
@Thunderbird2 In the event the poo did hit the fan, the only way you would be helping your Japanese friends (by staying in Japan) is if they used your body to shield themselves from the radiation.
Don't be afraid or ashamed of preparing a contingency plan EVER. If that means you have to help your friends from abroad then so be it. Better than being dead.
hoserfella
What exactly are your "contingency plans" should things go wrong and thousands of other people are running for the hills at he exact same time?
Jean Val-Jean
Tbird, always always have a contingency plan. My priority is to preserve the health and well-being of my loved ones.
If something goes terribly wrong during this process, which I hope does not, then it'll be time to preserve my family. My friends have the same responsibility to theirs.
There's an app named Tokyo Radiation that I'd recommend monitoring. It's free on PlayStore for Android.
moomoochoo
Good question. I don't have contingency plans, because I already left :)
To be honest, I really don't know what you would do. It would depend a lot on your location and the severity of the incident. Regardless, it's a good idea to think of what you should do should an emergency arise. It doesn't matter whether that emergency be an earthquake, tsunami or another TEPCO FU.
hoserfella
jean Val-Jean - in other words your "contingency plan" is to get the hell out of dodge. Not exactly scientific.
So be it. But as Leslie Corrice said, theres no use in fear-mongering using dubious worst-case scenarios. I saw a shocking amount of it from posters on JT after 3/11 and it was shameful.
Jean Val-Jean
Moomoochoo, Definitely agree. Gotta have a contingency plan regardless of the type of emergency.
smithinjapan
Thunderbird: "To those ready to run... what about your Japanese friends who can't runn away? Shades of March 2011 again."
Stop with the whole 'stoicism' thing. If you had children and those children and yourself were in danger, you would obviously do what you could to protect everyone. It's not 'running'. What is 'running' are people like Shimizu, who fled to Osaka with 'stomach problems' when it was his responsibility to help run things and protect others. If and when TEPCO screws up again and causes yet another disaster through their negligence, people will do what they can to ensure their safety, and if that includes being able to leave the area, then great. If you seem to think that it's unfair that some cannot, I suggest you blame the cause and not the people who can find somewhere else. To suggest people should stay in harm's way willingly in the event of the worst is asinine.
EthanWilber
With all eyes watching and some essential technical know-how assistance from aboard, Tepco may be alright on No. 4 rector, for now.
However, if anyone really puts his or her faith in Tepco's shaky operations in longer run, that would be a big stretch. Tepco is beyond saving considering its huge liability(still counting) and its ethical integrity.
Speaking of contingency plan in personal lever, least one can do would be to start charting a route to find a safer place (nuclear radiation diminishes a great deal with distance) when the first sign of crisis emerges, Keep essential documents and survival/emergency kit with you close-by will help you navigate through the initial chaos. Furthermore, practicing your situation awareness all of the time will definitely increase your odds to save lives.
colby222
@ZICHI Welcome back and thanks.
@Thunderbird2 Thanks mate for the support!!!! Do you know how hard it is to save your family, wife and kids, knowing that you have left behind other family and friends????? think before you post, PLEASE. It's been over 2 years and we have been shuned by by people who we thought were friends because we did the correct thing for our kids future. Turns out it was jealousy and when asked they too would have evacuated as well if they could. I don't know you, Married, kids, business in Japan so on, so I'm not going to judge you. DO you live in or aorund Fukushime Ken??
@Moomoochoo, thanks for your kind words
sp4cerat
http://photo.tepco.co.jp/library/131118_01/131118_01.jpg <- I wonder why they pixelate the one joint n the front. hope its not due to som damage or so
Thunderbird2
Apologies to anyone I've offended.
I have people I care about in Chiba prefecture and southern Tokyo. After 3/11 I went out there to make sure they were okay. I knew about the radiation spikes, and aftershocks, but I still went. Call it stupid if you like, but I felt guilty that I was safe on the other side of the planet while they could potentially have been killed.
I feel the same now with this going on at Fukushima. I feel guilty that I can't be there if the worst happens. I want to show my solidarity with my friends. It's not my country, not my home, but they are people I love and care about. Is that being stoic? Being stupid?
Again, sorry if I offended anyone.
colby222
Thunderbird2 Apology accepted, just try and think about it from the side of people like myself who lived in fukushima, for 12 years, have property in Fukushima and was going to live, raise my family, 5 kids, and be buried in one of the most beautiful places in the world. Not a second goes by everyday that we don't think about our family and friends we left behind. By the sounds of it you don't live in Japan? Why did you have to write "Is that being stoic? Being stupid?"? Words are strong and hurt deep. Once again THINK before you write
Heda_Madness
Germany has shown the way..
By increasing it's CO2 output, by building more coal power stations and importing energy from France. Really forward thinking there.
Experts have warned that slip-ups could trigger a rapid deterioration in the situation.
No quotes from Experts though. The media are struggling to find anyone credible to give the doomsday quotes they need to make it newsworthy so they make it up. Not sure where all the fear is coming from, it's certainly not coming from the experts.
Alex80
This article is scary: http://www.naturalnews.com/042952_Fukushima_fuel_rods_inadvertent_criticality.html
Is this possible or an exaggeration?
Alex80
@Farmboy: I guess you are right. Thank you. I'm rather confused. Sadly there is a lack of informations about the worst case scenario in mainstream media, and you can find something about it only in questionable sites like that.
Bear27840
I do not feel good about this.
Nipporinoel
So ..... These rods will be moved to a storage area.
Then what?
Jean Val-Jean
horsefella, feel free to have no plan. Stiff upper lip and all that.
Yes, there is real risk in the operation which has begun, and more later. Better to err on the side of safety.
smithinjapan
Thunderbird: There's no need to apologize. I'm willing to bet a whole lot of people, foreigners or not, who have a chance to move to a safe location feel bad for those who cannot, but that is not at all the same as 'running' from something. Throwing yourself in the face of danger when there's no reason to it is simply endangering one more person who does not need to be in danger. If it's jumping in and helping people, I can understand, but how do you fight radiation? If the worst happens, there is absolutely nothing that can be accomplished by staying behind, and worse if you decide to go there and 'help'.
hoserfella
.
Jean - looks to me like my "contingency plan" of buying a ticket out should the sky start to fall, is exactly the same as your well-thought out brilliance. In the meantime, I will live my life.
Jean Val-Jean
" Jean - looks to me like my "contingency plan" of buying a ticket out should the sky start to fall, is exactly the same as your well-thought out brilliance. In the meantime, I will live my life."
You might rethink the flying out bit, unless you plan to fly west from western Japan.
Having a contingency plan ready is a matter of basic preparedness. I prefer to be prepared if possible.
Jean Val-Jean
Yale University professor Charles Perrow wrote about the number 4 fuel pool this year in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. He said one pool contains 10 times the amount of radioactive caesium present in the Chernobyl disaster and warned one slip-up with the removal could trigger a chain reaction. "This has me very scared," he told the ABC. "Tokyo would have to be evacuated because [the] caesium and other poisons that are there will spread very rapidly. "Even if the wind is blowing in the other way, it's going to be monumental."
Mike O'Brien
Professor Charles Perrow warning us about nuclear plant operations.
So Jean Val-Jean do you ask an professor of engineering about how to treat your cold?
Perrow's clais are pure unadulterated FUD. But if you want to listen to him, I have a magic space rock I will sell you that will protect you from radiation, it also does wonders for acne.
Jean Val-Jean
Mike O'Brien, I don't particularly care for Perrow's analyses, however he writes about accident dynamics. His opinion is only one among many various opinions.
You might find a buyer for your magic space rock/acne cure on E-Bay.
Mike O'Brien
So Jean, you don't care for his analysis but you go ahead and quote his gloom and doom FUD. Now I understand your comments.
Heda_Madness
As I said before, they can't find any actual experts to quote for these doomsday articles. They certainly can't get them from scientists. And as I posted the other day 'Fears regarding environmental radioactivity, often a legacy of Cold War activities and distrust of governmental and scientific authorities, have resulted in perception of risks by the public that are not commensurate with actual risk'
And that comes from a peer reviewed paper on PNAS
*Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
PNAS is one of the world's most-cited multidisciplinary scientific serials. Since its establishment in 1914, it continues to publish cutting-edge research reports, commentaries, reviews, perspectives, colloquium papers, and actions of the Academy*
Fadamor
My disposal plan would involve the Mariana Trench. Space the fuel rods about 100 meters apart and set them down in the trench. But I see that's already been thought of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marianas_Trench#Possible_nuclear_waste_disposal_site
(DOH! Stupid international laws!)
Mike O'Brien
Why space them 100 meters apart? They are currently within 6 inches of each other with no ill effects?
But better yet, why throw away valuable materials?