The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
U.S. F-35A fighter jet deployment in Japan to start in spring 2026
AOMORI©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© KYODO
27 Comments
Login to comment
TaiwanIsNotChina
That's a beautiful machine.
Sh1mon M4sada
...and has priven to be very stealthy too. Russian S400 didn’t detect it in the recent air raids by Israel.
But apparently, according to Elon, USA doesn't need so many.
AustPaul
Sleek looking jet, we have them too and I can attest they are loud!
Hope not too many night manoeuvres for the locals.
Wasabi
It is design to kill people, I hardly say it is beautiful.
Bad Haircut
It's a very capable machine, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I still prefer the F-22, F-15, F-14, and for sheer bad-assery, the F-111.
Ken
Musk wants drones which is foolish considering how talented North Korean and Chinese hackers could potentially be
Zaphod
Japan needs more American military like a fish needs a bicycle.
dobre vam zajebava
taxpayers money "well" wasted...
BeerDeliveryGuy
Although the F-35 is impressive, IMO it lacks the speed to be used as an interceptor.
In SEAD and deep strike missions, it would definitely be useful, but it’s top speed of Mach 1.2 puts it at a disadvantage to the F-15 or Su-27 which can both fly at Mach 2.5.
With Misawa and Chitose’s proximity to Russia, every second counts when intercepting a bogey, and speed is more important than stealth.
Fos
The usual mercenaries inside the US administration trying to help themselves, less than two months before they check out, to the expenses of naive Japanese tax payers. The same US industrial military complex which has already caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in Ukraine and Gaza, and their big apparatus specialized in "warmongering"
TaiwanIsNotChina
Still Putin's War
TaiwanIsNotChina
You're right: they need nukes. Let's see you get behind that.
Peter14
Agree the F-35 with only one engine is much too slow. It is not designed for interdiction or air superiority. But its top speed is actually mach 1.62
A pity they couldn't produce new F-111 with modern avionics. They called it "the pig" as it could be difficulty to handle but it had speed and punch. A fantastic aircraft for its time.
Fos
CPowell
“Every statement I make today is backed up by sources, solid sources. These are not assertions”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyyhvgZpleo
Fos
The definition of US mercenaries, gloating on the death and violence they caused in Middle East and Ukraine as we speak.
The top 5 weapons manufacturers in the world, all American :
Lockheed Martin Corp
Raytheon Technologies
Northrop Grumman Corp
Boeing
General Dynamics Corp
WiseOneIn Kansai
Yawn,. . . .
More conspiracies and anti-US rhetoric!
TaiwanIsNotChina
Peking and Moscow have no moral authority on anything. They even say they will take all comers to BRICS.
Your favorite bedtime story.
And the next 5 are all Chinese.
Fos
WiseOneIn Kansai
There are people dying in Gaza and Lebanon through the same use of US war airplanes employed by Israel and bought by Japan, at the expenses of perhaps your employer tax contributions. Money which could go to daily care and assistance to needy people. And instead goes to Wall Street and the US hedge funds
KnightsOfCydonia
While this is absolutely where we should be aiming as a species, it is not practical at this time.
We live in a very dangerous period of history and literally everything is in the balance.
We need to show strength or the autocrats will move further to destabilize our way of life.
Fos
This is what we have shown so far, what you call deterrence: over $110 billions worth of weapons in Ukraine and Israel, provided by US, and few dozens more to Japan, South Korea, Taiwan. And look where we are now. We need dialogue and diplomacy, not warmongering by Washington
MilesTeg
If top speed was still a priority for all combat jets, you can bet the designers would've made all of them capable of +Mach2. It simply isn't as much of a critical factor as it used to be. In many studies, most pilots never actually needed to go over +Mach2. With improving long range BVR air to air missiles whose range continues to expand, you don't need to use speed to get so close to targets. The missiles do more work now and are faster.
The F-35 is multipurpose fighter designed for many roles including interdiction and intercept if need be but if high speed is deemed a mission priority, then the F-22 and F-15EX are both capable of +Mach2. Many current fighter planes aren't capable of +Mach2 but that doesn't reduce their effectiveness. Where the F-35 is unique is sheer computing power, stealth, data management, and communication. And it still looks sexy as hell.
BeerDeliveryGuy
Indeed, top speed is not a requirement for ALL fighter jets. However, the USAF especially is still chasing the white elephant of “multi-role fighters” while essentially making a Jack of all trades but a master of none.
In Japan’s case, the simple distance to their bad neighbors and vastness of airspace, considering it’s landmass, requires a fast, low maintenance, long range, heavily armed fighter/interceptor; in lieu of a strong naval air corps.
Stealth takes second priority in this case, as the radar blip of an F-15 approaching at Mach 2.2 is a deterrent in itself.
Sanjinosebleed
Get the cheque books ready for that peice of junk!
MilesTeg
@BeerDeliveryGuy
i keep hearing this axiom about multipurpose combat jets weaknesses and I think it applies to earlier attempts. Correct me if I’m wrong but the F-16 and F-18 are both multipurpose jets that have been very successful and also relatively cost efficient. They’re still in service today almost 40yrs since entering service. This is one Navy pilot I talked to said he thinks the F-16 is the best for all it’s capabilities, design, and low/cheap maintenance.
BeerDeliveryGuy
Yes, the F-18, 16, and 15 are longseller unicorns because they are (relatively) low cost, low maintenance, and combat effective as multi-role fighters.
However, correct me if I’m wrong, but the multi-role aspect and variations came after the initial development as an air superiority platform. (Other than the F-18, the Navy wanted something to replace the F-14, E-6)
kaimycahl
@Fos Wow I see the the company that I work for listed before
The definition of US mercenaries, gloating on the death and violence they caused in Middle East and Ukraine as we speak.
The top 5 weapons manufacturers in the world, all American :
Lockheed Martin Corp
Raytheon Technologies
Northrop Grumman Corp
Boeing
General Dynamics Corp
TaiwanIsNotChina
The only diplomacy that solves the Taiwan situation is the PRC acknowledging they will never control Taiwan.