politics

Some products likely to get exempted from U.S. tariffs, says Japan's trade minister

14 Comments
By Ami Miyazaki

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2018.

©2019 GPlusMedia Inc.

14 Comments
Login to comment

Separately, Japan is seeking a country exemption. ... That is only about 5 percent of Japan’s total steel exports....

The problem is that Japan is approaching this logically. As Trump sees it, Japan has a huge surplus with the US and therefore must be punished. The fact that that's not true (Japan bounces back and forth between deficits and surpluses with the US) does not matter. It's all symbolic.

Best would be to grovel and praise Trump's genius and exaggerate that some empty concessions are all due to Trump's brilliant negotiating acumen. That's the best way to continue business as usual.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Message to Japan:

If the US wants to impose trade tarrifs on specific products, then do the same with specific products (just like you already do with rice). Particularly with different states' signature products.

Example: bourbon (KY), brocolli (CA), soy beans (the entire Mid-West), etc

Very quickly, those states' senators and congressmen will listen.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

"Some products likely to get exempted from U.S. tariffs, says Japan's trade minister" = "be exempt from".

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

what exemptions will you make for US products, Japan?

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

what exemptions will you make for US products, Japan?

I think Japan already allows a disproportionate number of American idiots. Certainly, there's a serious trade imbalance there.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Wonderful news, but expected. Canada,Australia and even Mexico get exemptions,then it is only fair and just Japan - USAs Number One Ally,and USAs co-enforcer in East Asia - gets the exemption too.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

what exemptions will you make for US products, Japan?

Japan can cancel the import quota of US rice, which US prohibits Japan from giving or throwing away.

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

tinawatanabe

Japan can cancel the import quota of US rice, which US prohibits Japan from giving or throwing away.

The WTO imposed that not America and Japan is free to sell the rice to Japanese but instead stores it in silos for two years and unfit for human consumption then sells it on for animal feed.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

Interesting...

Now we know that "tariffs" perse imposed does not mean that they can be made specific and "allow" changes such as exemptions. The rates can be changed and items can be exempted.

As again, Trump stimulated "awareness" of the need to change perspective on "fairness" in trade and forced "discussion" to take place. The results are that tariffs can be "adjusted" or even be "removed" to make it "fair" between the parties involved. But that does not mean that there will be "equal" benefits or consequences for the countries, because each country has different needs and wants. (That is why "group" mentality such as EU or TPP sometimes becomes unfair for some of the members.)

2 ( +2 / -0 )

exempting one country and enforcing tariff on the other is a bad idea to begin with.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

The WTO imposed that not America and Japan is free to sell the rice to Japanese but instead stores it in silos for two years and unfit for human consumption then sells it on for animal feed.

WTO has nothing to do.  It was decided during TPP negotiations.  Japan stores it in silos because not many Japanese want to buy non-Japanese rice except cheap snack makers.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

tinawatanabe

WTO has nothing to do. It was decided during TPP negotiations. Japan stores it in silos because not many Japanese want to buy non-Japanese rice except cheap snack makers.

You are incorrect on all accounts. The quality of the California short grain is equal in taste and standard to the Japanese grains. People would buy the rice if it was made available especially at the lower prices. Japan had been practicing protectionism in the rice sector for a really long time, allowing rice prices in Japan to remain four times higher than the world average. . The cost of storing imported rice in warehouses at an annual cost to the government of $144 million, according to the United States Department of Agriculture.

WTO: Japan Adopts Rice Tariff Scheme 18 January 1999

https://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/wto-japan-adopts-rice-tariff-scheme

2 ( +3 / -1 )

"Some products likely to get exempted from U.S. tariffs, says Japan's trade minister" = "be exempt from".

Grammatically, "get exempted" is perfectly acceptable. As you don't write the headlines and as the headline isn't wrong, you're expressing a preference, not making a correction.

Your own version differs in emphasis in that "be exempt" can be taken to imply a status that already applies now, or that could in future be decided to apply based on current circumstances or laws. On the other hand, in the original headline, the intended meaning is unmistakeable.

If you substitute "be exempt" into the original headline, thanks to "likely", the tense becomes ambiguous, and the meaning is either that some products are exempt now, or that some products will become exempt in the future. Using "exempted" instead of "exempt" is clearer, and "get", which may be considered too colloquial by some (what isn't?) also does the job: "be" could be used instead but isn't necessary.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Zichi is right Short grain ae cultivate in Northern California by Japanese farmers in Calif. Botan bra, Koshihiiikarii. and seveeral more brands. Tastier than rice from northen Jaan's poor. farm. Product

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites