Japan stuck between hawkish U.S., provocative N Korea

"Japan stuck between hawkish U.S., provocative N Korea"

hawkish = advocating an aggressive or warlike policy, especially in foreign affairs.

US ain't hawkish, your distant primordial relations- kim dung ill is... and these days of white supremacy under Trump, the US which is a white man's country always has been, ask your women,, will annihilate as old former president L. B. Johnson alluded to any asian boys who get in the way now policy. Japan should know this more than any Asian country. What did Theodore "Dutch" Van Kirk say "the question is not how many did we kill, but did we kill enough" The White man rules the world that includes you too Japan, you just never read the fine print.

How is the USA being hawkish? The USA is the only thing keeping North Korea from attacking South Korea and Japan. China would sit by idly if that were to happen.

Just say thank you JT press.

I think Japan should focus on ballistic missile defense. Although the defenses deployed now are world-class, NK could still launch hundreds at a time so these need to be strengthened. If there is a military conflict, Japan will most definitely become a target so this should be the highest priority

"Japan stuck between hawkish U.S., provocative N Korea"

But

"Japan supports U.S. missile strike in Syria"

such casuist

For Japan, which lies within the range of missiles North Korea has already deployed

...and easily shot down.

Seoul is the problem being only 30 kilometers away or so with all those conventional hidden canon aimed at them. 30 million will be set aflame and Fatboy does not care.

Probably Japan think N Korean target is S Korea, Alaska, Washington State or Hawaii State. All Japan has to do is empty US military force from Japan

Toshiko, your lack of intelligence baffles me.

@Toshiko, my last comment was deleted by the almighty free speech hating JT so you can assume my guess on your intelligence.

Moderator: Please do not be impolite to other readers.