Japan Today
politics

U.S. needs Japan's help to boost military production, ambassador says

97 Comments
By Tim Kelly

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Thomson Reuters 2024.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

97 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Everybody should be making 155 mm shells and Patriot interceptor missiles to counter the state that is still fighting WW2. These are not escalatory things.

1 ( +14 / -13 )

All well and good but Japan currently is having a hard time finding people to do many jobs throughout the country.

7 ( +13 / -6 )

The red line is if Japan agrees to produce offensive weapons like artillery shells for the USA war machine. There's no way to claim such types of weapons are "defensive" in nature.

-6 ( +8 / -14 )

deanzaZZRToday 06:15 am JST

The red line is if Japan agrees to produce offensive weapons like artillery shells for the USA war machine. There's no way to claim such types of weapons are "defensive" in nature.

And the consequences for that will be.... Defensive weapons are a contradiction in terms.

-4 ( +10 / -14 )

In other words, Rahm Emanuel is suggesting that Japan start expanding industries to allow more people to be maimed and killed?

-6 ( +9 / -15 )

Does Costa Rica have to start a military build up ?

Some countries make their own way in world affairs.

The USA is not a model citizen.

Can we have another way forward ?

-3 ( +9 / -12 )

Don't do it Japan!

Already Japan's SDF is not the biggest or strongest but if they follow the USA and others like Canada they will end up cannibalizing their own military to supply Ukraine and Israel!

-6 ( +9 / -15 )

Sadly, it's a win-win for the U.S. and Japanese economy. Things are heating up all over the world. Not only Ukraine and Israel, but also Africa and Myanmar as well. I don't see Japan saying "no" to the business.

5 ( +11 / -6 )

The red line is if Japan agrees to produce offensive weapons like artillery shells for the USA war machine. There's no way to claim such types of weapons are "defensive" in nature.

Artillery rounds can be used in a defensive manner. In fact any weapon can

6 ( +12 / -6 )

GuruMickToday 06:36 am JST

Can we have another way forward ?

Not if it is a Russian or Chinese way, that is for darn sure.

1 ( +13 / -12 )

AntiquesavingToday 06:50 am JST

Don't do it Japan!

Already Japan's SDF is not the biggest or strongest but if they follow the USA and others like Canada they will end up cannibalizing their own military to supply Ukraine and Israel!

Do you believe JMSDF ships will be sent to Ukraine and Israel?

-1 ( +10 / -11 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 07:27 am JST

AntiquesavingToday 06:50 am JST

> Don't do it Japan!

> Already Japan's SDF is not the biggest or strongest but if they follow the USA and others like Canada they will end up cannibalizing their own military to supply Ukraine and Israel!

> Do you believe JMSDF ships will be sent to Ukraine and Israel?

What are you going on about again?

Who said anything about ships?

Why do you bring up something no one is talking about?

The facts are very clear and in the news!

Canada, Europe even the USA have admitted they have depleted their own military stocks of ammunition, vehicles missiles etc... no one said anything about ships or their own military being sent!

The facts are out there, the USA has even said production of shells and missiles now are priority to replace depleted stock first and this is why they are trying to push other countries to give their stock.

The UK has said the same as have many others.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Whose money will be used? Japan Tax Payer money? No Thanks!

-8 ( +5 / -13 )

NATO and all partner nations should be coordinating production on many levels, not just US and Japan.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

AntiquesavingToday 07:47 am JST

Japan's primary defense is of the naval variety. That is why it is nonsensical to say the Ukraine war is harming Japan's defense.

0 ( +5 / -5 )

What “deeper defence industry collaboration” actually means is buying more US-made weapons at marked-up prices. But of course, Japan cannot say no to the viceroy sent here from the master country.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

@JboneInTheZone Did you not notice the nuance I was showing the use of ""? Current policy in Japan is to use this facade to green light weapon sales.

The USA also (in)famously named a missile capable of destroying multiple cities Peacekeeper.

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

The US always stated its military was capable of fighting two wars. It is not even fighting a single war.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

You Japanese are on your own,no matter what government of the US says ,the majority of American do not care about your survival, because they have say and your protection is not important too them

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 07:49 am JST

AntiquesavingToday 07:47 am JST

> Japan's primary defense is of the naval variety. That is why it is nonsensical to say the Ukraine war is harming Japan's defense.

Well if 50,000 JMSDF and 13,000 coastguard personnel

GSDF has 150,000 personnel airSDF 50,000

So not sure about your claim but either way, nothing in the article about JMSDF or going anywhere.

It is about equipment!

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Why doesn't the US outsource production to China, like Apple and many others? It would be interesting to see "Made in China" on a Patriot Missile and 50% of them don't work.

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

I find it amusing that around half of those opposed to US support of Ukraine/East Asia complain that it just makes the US richer, and the other half complain that it makes the US poorer.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

deanzaZZRToday 08:03 am JST

The USA also (in)famously named a missile capable of destroying multiple cities Peacekeeper.

Was it ever fired in combat? Well there you go...

1 ( +4 / -3 )

wallaceToday 08:06 am JST

The US always stated its military was capable of fighting two wars. It is not even fighting a single war.

Only from a manufacturing perspective. We were too busy enjoying the peace dividend while Russia was preparing for war since 1945. In any event, it can be solved so you can get your two wars and be impressed again.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Ramsey's KitchenToday 08:30 am JST

Everybody should be making 155 mm shells and Patriot interceptor missiles to counter the state that is still fighting WW2. These are not escalatory things.

Everybody should be making more efforts to talk and bring peace not making more ammunition to prolong the neocon conflicts. Those who wish to see more fighting instead are free to volunteer to the frontline in the meantime.

Ukraine's independence is on the line and ammunition helps them, not bleats for peace from the Putinist.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

It's okay when daddy USA tells us to do it!

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

deanzaZZRToday  06:15 am JST

The red line is if Japan agrees to produce offensive weapons like artillery shells for the USA war machine. There's no way to claim such types of weapons are "defensive" in nature.

No such "redline" exists. Japan has already produced ammunition for the US in time of shortage. They have also supplied ammunition to the South Koreans during UN peace keeping operations.

There is nothing in the J-constitution that prohibits weapons production or exports, and any limitations are self-imposed and can be overturned. All weapons can be offensve or defensive based on why, when and how they are used. Only those objecting to anything military in Japan perpetuate this "defensive only" myth.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 09:02 am JST

We were too busy enjoying the peace dividend while Russia was preparing for war since 1945. In any event, it can be solved so you can get your two wars and be impressed again.

Peace?

America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776“, i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.

So much for a peaceful country!

Yep the USA has been great at avoiding any battles on its soil but it sure invaded, bombed, lead coups d'etats, sent it's military into other countries always under the false claims if protecting democracy and protecting USA interests often putting a dictator in place in the countries it claimed to be defending democracy!

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

One of the few, if not the only time, I have agreed with P45 is his making an issue out of our allies in Europe and Asia not putting in their fair and agreed share to defend the freedom we enjoy from autocracies. Putin has corrected the situation in Europe, and Xi is doing the same in Asia. The United States can not continue as the world's policeman by itself. Increasing their own military capabilities and advancing closer cooperation among like minded allied nations, both strategically and economically is necessary to preserve the present world order.

Japan and South Korea have tremendous shipbuilding experience, technology and capacity. It makes perfect sense to tap this potential with our allies.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Sadly these are the time where major countries around the world are rearming and using a good amount of their founds in military spendings.

Japan in the end if following the trend,one can only hope that the change in leadership in several nations like Russia,China and other regimes could bring a normalization but so far it might be just a wish.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Whose money will be used? Japan Tax Payer money? No Thanks!

American taxpayer money.

Japan produces the arms, the US DoD buys them.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

Ossan, American do not need the assistance of weak insecure Japanese leaders, American do like cowards, who cannot and will not defend themselves

-10 ( +0 / -10 )

deanzaZZRToday 06:15 am JST

The red line is if Japan agrees to produce offensive weapons like artillery shells for the USA war machine.

Per OssanAmerica's comment, this statement is untrue.

There is nothing in Japan's constitution that would prohibit this. Japan does have export rules preventing the supply of weapons to countries at war, but the US is not at war, despite what the pro-CCP/Kremlin hordes assert.

kurisupisuToday 06:25 am JST

In other words, Rahm Emanuel is suggesting that Japan start expanding industries to allow more people to be maimed and killed?

No, to stop those people that are maiming and killing/would maim and kill others.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of bad people in the world, and only a fool leaves themself unprepared for such people.

Ramsey's KitchenToday 08:30 am JST

Everybody should be making more efforts to talk and bring peace

Unfortunately, talks with dictators don't work. Didn't work with Hitler, didn't work with Mussolini, and won't work with Putin, Xi and the like.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

What “deeper defence industry collaboration” actually means is buying more US-made weapons at marked-up prices. But of course, Japan cannot say no to the viceroy sent here from the master country.

Completely wrong, this is about the US needing to buy from Japanese industry to cover its shortfall. The flow of money is from the US to Japan in this instance. We are talking billions of US defence dollars being spent on Japanese defence industry goods and services. Cha-ching$$$.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

It's time to turn Japan into a porcupine.

It's sad to say but with aggressive neighbors like these, who needs enemies?

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Welcome to the military-industrial complex!

0 ( +3 / -3 )

isabelle

Today 10:08 am JST

Yes the USA has a nack at being at war without being at war!

Police action, etc...are the words and way the USA avoids saying it is at war!

But in reality the USA has been at war in one form or another 222 Out of 239 Years of it's existence.

No, to stop those people that are maiming and killing/would maim and kill others.

Yes like all the dictators and authoritarian governments the USA has put in place and supported for decades!

Democracy, right? I guess Vietnam and Korea coups d'etats organiser by the USA, the removal of the elected government in Iran placing the shaw in power leading to the Islamic revolution, the support for Batista in Cuba leading to Castro, the coup in Chile putting Pinochet in power, the coup in Argentina and the list goes on!

Unfortunately, talks with dictators don't work. Didn't work

Funny, the USA had no problem with pro USA dictators in all the above and more!

The hypocrisy is deafening but not surprising as most Americans are clueless about the role their government has played in putting dictators in power.

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

AntiquesavingToday 09:36 am JST

America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776“, i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.

So much for a peaceful country!

But not the kind of barbarism Russia has going on right now. No use for massed 155 mm artillery in the wars you are talking about post-WW2.

Yep the USA has been great at avoiding any battles on its soil but it sure invaded, bombed, lead coups d'etats, sent it's military into other countries always under the false claims if protecting democracy and protecting USA interests often putting a dictator in place in the countries it claimed to be defending democracy!

The attempt at worldwide revolution was real. Thankfully we largely kept our hemisphere clean among other successes.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

What would help Ukraine most is ceasefire and peace

That's correct. Unfortunately, the only party that can stop this war now, is the same party that started it, and continues to drag it out; Russia.

Unfortunately Putin has zero interest in peace, as it doesn't work into his desire to provoke NATO into a war.

So the war continues, and all Russian soldiers in Ukraine must die. Or go home.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

Links needed. Are you suggesting that Japan supplied ammunition to the USA military in direct support of fighting in Vietnam, Iraq or the like?

No such "redline" exists. Japan has already produced ammunition for the US in time of shortage. They have also supplied ammunition to the South Koreans during UN peace keeping operations.

And what has Japan supplied to Ukraine? Japan has supplied bulletproof vests, helmets and I believe some Toyota 4 wheelers.

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 10:22 am JST

But not the kind of barbarism Russia has going on right now. No use for massed 155 mm artillery in the wars you are talking about post-WW2

You should look up USA history!

Let me know what you find!

You should just start with the Philippines, that's a good one then check out Vietnam, agent orange is a fun gift that keeps on giving to this day!

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

You do not have any say in America election,you do not have a vote

Or maybe I'm American, and I do.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Truth be told as it's bin clear for quite some time the iron clad protection that the USA promises is too difficult to maintain without the use of weapons of mass destruction

Japan makes great stuff however Japan as a major weapons manufacturer puts itself national security at risk.

Japanese people want peace not war.

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

Recent story. The US military ships to be repaired in Japanese shipyards.

"Navy warships to be repaired at Japanese shipyards, ambassador says. YOKOSUKA NAVAL BASE, Japan — The U.S. Navy plans to send some of its vessels to Japanese shipyards for maintenance to reduce the time it takes them to return to service, the U.S. ambassador to Japan announced Friday."

https://www.stripes.com/branches/navy/2024-01-19/navy-ship-repair-japanese-shipyards-12724715.html#:~:text=Navy%20warships%20to%20be%20repaired%20at%20Japanese%20shipyards%2C%20ambassador%20says,-By&text=YOKOSUKA%20NAVAL%20BASE%2C%20Japan%20%E2%80%94%20The,ambassador%20to%20Japan%20announced%20Friday.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

No wars ended during Trump's term.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Anything that upsets the CCP and CCP supporters has to be good for the world.

Don't pretend there's redlines and pseudo cold wars etc. China has already crossed all the redlines and started preparation for war. It would be foolish for the free democractic nations like Japan to still debate who are its friends and allies.

https://www.businessinsider.com/china-built-mock-up-taiwans-presidential-office-area-desert-images-2024-3

3 ( +4 / -1 )

That's correct. Unfortunately, the only party that can stop this war now, is the same party that started it, and continues to drag it out; Russia.

That's not entirely correct though is it.

Ukraine could stop fighting and cede territory or sign an agreement would also stop the war

Not saying Ukraine should

Just correcting false narrative !

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Only from a manufacturing perspective. We were too busy enjoying the peace dividend while Russia was preparing for war since 1945.

The then Soviet Union had a massive state operated arms industry, focused on quantity, resilience to isolation, and survivability of the industry.

In the start of WW2, the US didn’t even have enough rifles to arm all its soldiers, but wartime economy kicked in, and shortages were soon resolved as companies with capable machinery and production lines were given manufacturing quotas of arms components.

I remember a 1943 M2 .50cal that was stamped with the Singer sewing machine company seal in the armory.

In the event of another full scale war against a peer power, the US may not have the industrial base to manufacture arms on that scale anymore.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

Ukraine could stop fighting and cede territory or sign an agreement would also stop the war

That’s stupid. They’re fighting for the freedom of their nation.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

The US supports genocide, mayhem and destruction. The US is the largest weapons producer in the world and the last thing the world needs is more weaponry. The US is still supplying weapons to Israel.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

That’s stupid. They’re fighting for the freedom of their nation.

Fighting a war impossible to win isn't intelligent

Does it somehow appear that Ukraine has achieved freedom or will win ?

Bravo to the tenacity and bravery to keep Fighting however in the end will it have bin worth it.

Better to negotiate a deal and establish a demilitarized zone.

Fighting isn't the only solution to the war.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

In other words, Rahm Emanuel is suggesting that Japan start expanding industries to allow more people to be maimed and killed?

Pretty much.

No wars ended during Trump's term.

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

-6 ( +2 / -8 )

Fighting a war impossible to win isn't intelligent

Do you think this supposed inevitable loss will come in more or less than 72-hours?

In case it's not clear, I'm making fun of your assertion that Ukraine is fated to lose. Ukraine was supposed to lose in 72-hours, remember?

Or was this hellhole Putin has got himself into, with the entire planet that matters hating Russia and quarantining them all part of his plan? Is he playing 4D chess like Trump?

3 ( +5 / -2 )

The US is the largest weapons producer in the world

Are you completely sure that's an accurate assessment ?

Americans also think America is the greatest nation on earth.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

Better to negotiate a deal and establish a demilitarized zone.

Yes, 20-30km of Russian territory ceded as a DMZ seems like a good first step. What else is Russia willing to give up?

4 ( +6 / -2 )

The USA is the largest exporter of arms and holds 40% of the market.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

"China has a major capacity we already know that will surpass us on new shipbuilding," Emanuel said.

Is it an overcapacity?

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

bass4funk

No wars ended during Trump's term.

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

No American wars have started since Biden took office.

7 ( +7 / -0 )

deanzaZZRToday  10:28 am JST

Links needed. Are you suggesting that Japan supplied ammunition to the USA military in direct support of fighting in Vietnam, Iraq or the like?

Look it up yourself.

Japan provided the United States with small arms ammunition during the Iraq War in December 2004. This transfer occurred amidst the Battle of Fallujah and was part of Japan's support for the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. The decision was significant as it marked one of the first times Japan had supplied military materials to a country involved in an ongoing conflict, reflecting Japan's evolving security policies post-World War II.

And what has Japan supplied to Ukraine? Japan has supplied bulletproof vests, helmets and I believe some Toyota 4 wheelers.

Japan says it will send Patriot air defence missiles to the US after changing its arms export rules, in a shift away from its pacifist policies. The White House has welcomed the move, which could free up the US to send its own stockpile to Ukraine.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67798740

In December 2023, Japan revised the implementation guidelines for its three principles on the transfer of defense equipment to allow finished defense products manufactured under license from foreign companies to be exported to the companies’ countries. It also announced a plan to sell the Self-Defense Forces’ Patriot surface-to-air guided missiles to the United States.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 10:22 am JST

The attempt at worldwide revolution was real. Thankfully we largely kept our hemisphere clean among other successes.

Let me remind you about post WW2 USA!

Support for dictator Batista resulting in Castro.

Orchestrating the coup d'etat in Iran putting dictator the Shaw, resulting in the ayatollah's !

Vietnam, resulting in millions dead and agent orange still causing serious illness to millions!

Destabilizing both Laos and Cambodia resulting in the Khmer rouge!

Coups d'etats in Chile and Argentina putting Pinochet and military junta in power and supplying them with weapons to remain in power.

Backing Saddam Hussein in a war against Iran resulting in hundreds of thousands killed and the eventual invasion of Iraq and continued hostilities with Iran!

All the while supplying other pro USA dictators and "opposition warlords" around the world resulting in millions of deaths.

Drop the USA good Russia/USSR bad scenario! They both did what was advantageous for themselves and never for anyone else!

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

No wars ended during Trump's term.

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

No American wars have started since Biden took office.

Yes, Russia and Ukraine

-9 ( +1 / -10 )

Yes, Russia and Ukraine

Started by Russia. Not an American war... yet. But if Putin invades NATO...

2 ( +5 / -3 )

AntiquesavingToday 10:22 am JST

Yes the USA has a nack at being at war without being at war!

As I say, "despite what the pro-CCP/Kremlin hordes assert."

Yes like all the dictators and authoritarian governments the USA has put in place and supported for decades!

The US' past actions have absolutely no bearing on current aggression by China and Russia.

The threat must be dealt with, and that is exactly what the US, Japan, and the rest of the free world are doing.

Funny, the USA had no problem with pro USA dictators in all the above and more!

Again, past actions have no bearing on the current situation. The US has made some terrible missteps in its foreign policy -- I'd certainly agree with that -- but it's irrelevant to the points that Emanuel is making here.

Mr GoodmanToday 11:18 am JST

Japan makes great stuff however Japan as a major weapons manufacturer puts itself national security at risk.

Japan not being a major weapons manufacturer puts national security at risk.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Let me remind you about post WW2 USA!

"Let me whaddabout my hatred for USA again!"

The USA didn't invade Ukraine. You can whaddabout all day long again but it won't change the fact that Russia has repeatedly invaded Ukraine and annexed its territory.

These are FACTS etc.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

Japan needs to do its part and chip in more. Can't just enjoy the U.S. protection without contributing.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

bass4funk

No wars ended during Trump's term.

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

No American wars have started since Biden took office.

Yes, Russia and Ukraine

Supplying aid to Ukraine does not mean America is at war with Russia. The EU is also supplying aid and they too are not at war.

No American troops have been killed in Ukraine.

8 ( +9 / -1 )

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

No American wars have started since Biden took office.

Yes, Russia and Ukraine

If you are counting wars started by other countries then its also incorrect to say that no wars started under Trump's presidency.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

isabelle

Today 12:42 pm JST

ClippetyClop

Today 12:44 pm JST

It is amazing how so many are so willing to ignore and forget what they don't like!

If you both think the USA has changed and isn't still doing what it has done for the past 80 years fine live in your little world!

whaddabout

As I say, "despite what the pro-CCP/Kremlin hordes assert."

All just attempts at not accepting facts and reality.

Just because someone doesn't agree with the USA government on interference in other countries, it's pro USA interests regardless of the effects on local populations it's history of proxy wars, doesn't mean they are pro CCP or Russia but are stating facts.

But go ahead lable others whatever you want because you cannot defend or admit USA policy or actions!

-7 ( +2 / -9 )

Surprising. Surprising. Before anyone knew about it, Japan has become a big weapons producer. Japan seems to have remilitarized itself fully despite the post-war pacifist constitution and its repeated vows not to commit the same mistake. 

Probably, Japan’s possession of nuclear arsenal may be near at hand. All this with the sanction by Washington, I’m afraid.

As far as these weapons are not used against the U.S., it’s all right for Japan to remilitarize and build up arms, Washington may think, I'm afraid.

.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

Started by Russia. Not an American war... yet.

With Americans involved though.

But if Putin invades NATO...

Congress will have a difficult time authorizing America to engage in any military conflict considering that most Americans don’t want to get involved in this conflict.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

No wars ended during Trump's term.

No wars were started either, that’s the main thing

No American wars have started since Biden took office.

Yes, Russia and Ukraine

Supplying aid to Ukraine does not mean America is at war with Russia.

You are involved

The EU is also supplying aid and they too are not at war.

I don’t care either way.

No American troops have been killed in Ukraine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/29/memorial-day-americans-killed-ukraine-russia-war/

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

isabelle

Today 12:42 pm JST

As I say, "despite what the pro-CCP/Kremlin hordes assert."

Every time I see this type of comment and lables being tossed around, I think mccarthyism and the red scare!

but it's irrelevant to the points that Emanuel is making here.

What point would that be? Oh right, it is good for USA interests!

Funny how the USA is asking Japan to make weapons to sell and for the USA and friends but then blocks Japanese non military businesses!

Ah but what are friends for, right?

-5 ( +2 / -7 )

Washington Post is a paywall.

5 ( +5 / -0 )

The US is a member of NATO and obliged under Article 5 to protect other member countries. Just like NATO did for the US on 9/11.

6 ( +7 / -1 )

voiceofokinawaToday  01:08 pm JST

Surprising. Surprising. Before anyone knew about it, Japan has become a big weapons producer. Japan seems to have remilitarized itself fully despite the post-war pacifist constitution and its repeated vows not to commit the same mistake. 

The "mistake" is to advocate imperialism and fascism, and use military force to invade, dominate, and occupy other nations. Something that Russia is doing right now, and China is threatening to do.

Japan could produce all the weapons in the world and it still would not be comitting "the same mistake".

Japan did not mass produce weapons for other countries in all of it's history including WWII.

Hope you recover from your 平和ボケ. Global circumstances, none of which is Japan's doing, behooves Japan to do so.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

bass4funkToday 01:16 pm JST

No American troops have been killed in Ukraine.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/05/29/memorial-day-americans-killed-ukraine-russia-war/

You see the word "veteran" there? That means the US is not at war.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

The US is a member of NATO and obliged under Article 5 to protect other member countries. Just like NATO did for the US on 9/11.

The bigger question is, do you really need NATO these days, wouldn’t it be better if we could try to come to some understanding with Russia have some sit downs and some talks? I mean, Russia dissolved the Warshaw pact, why not do the same and dissolve NATO? We don’t have to be the best of friends, but maybe we can come to an understanding, I think we should be able to have relations with Russia, good diplomatic, but as long as we make Putin, the enemy or Russia and make them seem antagonistic, we will never have political peace.

-8 ( +1 / -9 )

AntiquesavingToday 12:37 pm JST

Let me remind you about post WW2 USA!

Support for dictator Batista resulting in Castro.

The lights would be on in Havana right now if Batista hadn't been overthrown.

Orchestrating the coup d'etat in Iran putting dictator the Shaw, resulting in the ayatollah's !

Ok. Now why do they have nothing to do with their free time but support terrorism for 50 years?

Vietnam, resulting in millions dead and agent orange still causing serious illness to millions!

Great power struggles are not good for the locals. I assume you know that Soviet Union and China were happy contributors to that.

Destabilizing both Laos and Cambodia resulting in the Khmer rouge!

Yup, the local population bears no responsibility for their country.

Coups d'etats in Chile and Argentina putting Pinochet and military junta in power and supplying them with weapons to remain in power.

Backing Saddam Hussein in a war against Iran resulting in hundreds of thousands killed and the eventual invasion of Iraq and continued hostilities with Iran!

Chile, Argentina, and Iraq are doing just fine.

All the while supplying other pro USA dictators and "opposition warlords" around the world resulting in millions of deaths.

Millions and millions, huh? I suggest you find more accurate sources.

Drop the USA good Russia/USSR bad scenario! They both did what was advantageous for themselves and never for anyone else!

Then it is time for you to acknowledge that Russia is clearly in the wrong in 2024.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

I wonder if the pro war pro USA NATO etc.. actually hear themselves?

On one hand they go on and on about Russia not being able to beat Ukraine but then fear monger that Russia will attack NATO countries!

Get real! If as you all say Russia is able to defeat Ukraine how on earth is it going to attack and think it can beat the full force of NATO?

Either you have to admit that Russia is powerful and will defeat Ukraine and capable of attacking NATO countries or that it is not strong enough to beat Ukraine and therefore not a threat to NATO countries, you cannot have it both ways?

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

You take this to the street in Tokyo and ask the average Nakyayma on the Tokyo street, "should Japan build weapons for the USA military" and I would be shocked if even 2 out of 10 give a definite 'yes'.

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

bass4funkToday 02:03 pm JST

The US is a member of NATO and obliged under Article 5 to protect other member countries. Just like NATO did for the US on 9/11.

The bigger question is, do you really need NATO these days, wouldn’t it be better if we could try to come to some understanding with Russia have some sit downs and some talks? I mean, Russia dissolved the Warshaw pact, why not do the same and dissolve NATO? We don’t have to be the best of friends, but maybe we can come to an understanding, I think we should be able to have relations with Russia, good diplomatic, but as long as we make Putin, the enemy or Russia and make them seem antagonistic, we will never have political peace.

You see: Russia has been preparing the materials of war for 80 years and Putin has been plotting it for 20. They aren't happy with Poland being in NATO, let alone countries to the east. You don't just sit down with a genocidal maniac with a penchant for military deception without having him on the ropes first. Also your proposal would have more impact if it weren't coming straight from felons and people that never served a day in their lives.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

AntiquesavingToday 02:12 pm JST

Either you have to admit that Russia is powerful and will defeat Ukraine and capable of attacking NATO countries or that it is not strong enough to beat Ukraine and therefore not a threat to NATO countries, you cannot have it both ways?

The problem is Russia's entire method of operating is maskirovka and hybrid warfare. In the past two years, Russia has brought Hamas and Iran into the fold as dear allies. Such a country can not be negotiated with until it abandons those principles at least for a time again.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

You see: Russia has been preparing the materials of war for 80 years and Putin has been plotting it for 20. They aren't happy with Poland being in NATO,

I don’t think Poland should be in NATO tbh.

let alone countries to the east. You don't just sit down with a genocidal maniac with a penchant for military deception without having him on the ropes first.

Well, when the war fanatics take that approach we can never have Detonte, and we can never come to an agreement, do you constantly pointing fingers at Russia, but give Ukraine a pass, I think neither country should be given a pass, but I do think that we should have some reasonable relations, and as long as United States and the rest of the world treats, Russia, just as an enemy, then Russia can do the same, for the war industry. It’s great business, so I can see them not wanting to work out anything with Russia.

Also your proposal would have more impact if it weren't coming straight from felons and people that never served a day in their lives.

Not sure what that senseless rent meant, but so far this administration, and particularly the Democrats in the swamp machine will not undermine Putin, just not going to happen

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

6 ( +6 / -0 )

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

I think our governments pose a more existential threat towards humanity than a one Russia

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

The United States turned Russia into an enemy since the time of the Russian Revolution and the rise of communism. The US fought in many wars in foreign countries to try and stop the spread of communism and also conducted a domestic campaign to root out communist influences in Hollywood. Communism is what many Americans were taught to fear. Also becoming part of the American DNA.

Russia has invaded many countries. 20 in total.

The Russian Bear became the enemy many decades ago.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 02:10 pm JST

The lights would be on in Havana right now if Batista hadn't been overthrown.

So you support pro USA dictators! Nice to know!

Millions and millions, huh? I suggest you find more accurate sources.

Vietnam over one million not counting the victims of agent orange estimated between 1 and 2 million death not counting the 150,000 to 500,00 stillborn it caused.

Iraq Iran war, 500,000 dead.

Chile and Argentina 30,000

Congo under Mobutu backed by the USA and supplied by the USA 100,000 to 300,000 died during his rule and as many as 3 million more in the mess after and USA supplied weapons fuelled the killing.

Somoza regime of Nicaragua, 50,000 to 100,000 not including the 30,000 to 50,000 during the revolution at the end!

Would you like more?

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

bass4funk

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

I think our governments pose a more existential threat towards humanity than a one Russia

It is not only Russia.

The US required the help of NATO on 9/11. Again in Iraq and Afghanistan. Russia is not the only enemy. The US also used NATO in Serbia under Clinton.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

TaiwanIsNotChina

Today 02:20 pm JST

The problem is Russia's entire method of operating is maskirovka and hybrid warfare. In the past two years, Russia has brought Hamas and Iran into the fold as dear allies. Such a country can not be negotiated with until it abandons those principles at least for a time again.

And how is that any different than the USA?

The USA has partnered with terrorists groups, oppressive regimes like Saddam Hussein, the taliban, and many many more!

You act as if Russia/USSR were the only ones doing this!

Honestly do you even know USA history?

Sorry to burst your bubble but the USA is as good if not better at "maskirovka and hybrid warfare" as any other countries to be exact it wrote the book on it long before the Soviet union existed.

-4 ( +2 / -6 )

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

I think our governments pose a more existential threat towards humanity than a one Russia

It is not only Russia.

But mainly Russia as the largest nuclear power nation.

The US required the help of NATO on 9/11. Again in Iraq and Afghanistan. Russia is not the only enemy. The US also used NATO in Serbia under Clinton.

Again, I think the U.S. and European governments are more concerning at this point and time

-7 ( +0 / -7 )

bass4funk

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

I think our governments pose a more existential threat towards humanity than a one Russia

Since Russia is not the enemy.

Should the US consider closing down its 800 overseas bases, reducing its military size to just what is necessary for defending the country, decommissioning unnecessary aircraft carriers, and cutting the defense budget by two-thirds?

5 ( +5 / -0 )

The US required the help of NATO on 9/11. Again in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And how did Iraq and Afghanistan become a threat?

Oh right, because the USA backed groups in Afghanistan including the taliban and backed Saddam Hussein in a war with Iran, leading to both becoming bigger threats!

So the USA created the problem in the first place!

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

NATO exists for mutual protection against an external enemy.

I think our governments pose a more existential threat towards humanity than a one Russia

Since Russia is not the enemy.

Should the US consider closing down its 800 overseas bases, reducing its military size to just what is necessary for defending the country, decommissioning unnecessary aircraft carriers, and cutting the defense budget by two-thirds?

No, and the reason for that is because of the Islamic and Chinese threat that remains. I was specifically talking about Russia as a largest nuclear European nation.

-6 ( +0 / -6 )

Russia is also an Asian country. From Europe to the Japan Sea.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites