Shigeto Nagai, an economist at Oxford Economics. He says that the Japanese government offering shot-term tax breaks likely will not convince firms to raise wages, calling instead for reforms in areas such as Japan's rigid labor system.
© Thomson ReutersVoices
in
Japan
quote of the day
First and foremost, politicians must abandon the unrealistic and optimistic premise of Abenomics that Japan can cure all ills just by reflating nominal growth.
©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.
15 Comments
Login to comment
JeffLee
Japan was stuck in deflation and recession when Abenomics started. Many things improved. The exception is personal income, but that is a problem created by private-sector employers, not the govt. The corporations are consciously choosing to hoard their growing cash piles rather than give raises in line with their profit growth.
Corporate tax breaks (!) won't work because shareholder capitalism rewards greed. They'll just hoard more. Tax hikes are the solution, using the extra revenue for enhanced benefits for low-income workers and creating a proper social safety net.
kibousha
Just look at the policies of parties in this coming election, no one present a long-term investment policies. 10K-yen one-time money, 3 months no-tax, 5% tax reduction for a limited time. All are just patches policies, none that creates hope the country can look forward to.
ShinkansenCaboose
I am so glad the article went into depth on Japan’s rigid labor system. Quite informative.
Cricky
Before I make a comment on this, I have to get a stack of A4 paper and get ink for my Hanko and prime my fax machine using the landline. It might help if I don my toupee and put on adult diapers. Now I’m ready.
zurcronium
Abe three arrows:
(i) aggressive monetary policy
did carry out resulting in J government owning 40% of the Nikkei winners, stock owners, losers everyone else. Japan still experiencing deflation.(ii) fiscal consolidation
Bah hah hah, nothing done here at all. Zero. Total failure.(iii) growth strategy
Bah hah hah, Japan still striking economically.And Womanomics, another failure. Japan gender ratings worse now than ten years ago. 30% goal of women managers by 2020 huge failure. More women in poverty now than ten years ago.
So yes Abe failed and more Abenomics will result in more failure.
englisc aspyrgend
He is right, a radical reform of the archaic Japanese labour market is required, with greater workers rights and statutory protection and support for those exercising them.
As long as politicians are so closely linked with industry and tied by financial apron strings there will always be a conflict of interest that they will inevitably resolve in favour of what best serves their own pockets.
Japan is a very unbalanced society with a very long standing focus on supporting business and thereby more covertly the wealthy elites who run business and the government. In any other democracy this could not continue for long but Japanese culture facilitates it.
Cricky
I’m going to pull my really expensive small Abe San mask over my eyes and cry.
happyhere
@JeffLee
It was not just personal income that did not improve under Abenomics, it was all aspects of wealth for 90% of the population.
Nagai's blog:
https://blog.oxfordeconomics.com/content/japan-why-abenomics-failed-to-reflate-household-wealth
JeffLee
@happyhere
Well, salary/income determines household wealth for most households far more than any other factor.
Huh? Japan's household financial assets rose to record highs during the Abenomics years. Some households did better than others, that was because they invested more of their savings instead of traditionally holding cash or buying govt bonds and life insurance. The Abe administration did actively promote non-taxable retirement schemes like NISA, but if people choose not to join them, that's their problem, not the govt's. They're very accessible and user-friendly.
Aly Rustom
Shigeto Nagai should run for PM
happyhere
@JeffLee
Please learn the difference between average household assets and median household assets and report back. I recommend Piketty.
If the top 20% double their assets and the bottom 80%'s wealth declines a bit because they don't have any assets to invest, the average still goes up. The 80%' s wealth goes down.